Socially Influencing UX - Design Workshop
•
2 recomendaciones•766 vistas
Does your UX design persuade people to act differently and perpetually influence their thoughts? UX/UI designers, innovators, influencers, strategists, web developers, marketers, advertisers, system architects, product developers, data analysts, disruptors, digital rebels, now-ists, scientists, game changers - let's use the strategies for designing UX aimed at driving people to change their minds and acquire new behaviors. Let's apply an extensive body of knowledge from social psychology, focusing on social influence, behavioral change, persuasion, to design socially influential UX.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Destacado
Destacado (19)
Similar a Socially Influencing UX - Design Workshop
Similar a Socially Influencing UX - Design Workshop (20)
Más de Agnis Stibe
Más de Agnis Stibe (20)
Último
Último (20)
Socially Influencing UX - Design Workshop
- 2. SOCIALLY INFLUENCING UX 09:00 OPEN 10:45 – 11:00 COFFEE 12:45 – 13:30 LUNCH 15:15 – 15:30 COFFEE 17:00 CLOSE INTRO HOMEWORKS BEHAVIOR CHANGE SOCIALLY INFLUENCING UX COMPUTER–SUPPORTED INFLUENCE BACKFIRES DESIGNING PRESENTING TAKEAWAYS NEXT STEPS
- 3. MIT Media Lab School of Architecture and Planning
- 6. SOCIALLY INFLUENCING UX DEMO OR DIE
- 10. SOCIALLY INFLUENCING UX DEPLOY OR DIE
- 11. Persuasive Urban Mobility Dr. Agnis Stibe 12
- 14. FUTURE BEHAVIOR PRESENT BEHAVIOR TARGET GROUP
- 15. DO HOMEWORK 2-3 DAYS EARLIER DOING HOMEWORK LAST MINUTE UX WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS
- 16. STOP LITTERING / PICK UPTRASH DO NOT ACT UPON LITTERING MY NEIGHBOURS
- 17. READ IT DO NOT READTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DEVELOPERS
- 18. DO IT MORE OFTEN RARELY ATTEND HACKATHONS YOUNG / EXPERIENCED DESIGNERS
- 19. BROWSE SUPPORT CENTER INSTEAD PREFER CONTACTING SUPPORT NEW USERS
- 20. NARROW PARTICIPANTS DISCUSSIONS PARTICIPATE IN UX DISCUSSIONS VARIOUS EMPLOYEES
- 38. PERSUASION SOCIAL INFLUENCE ORIGIN Intention or agenda Presence of other people DRIVER Reasoning or argument Behavior of surrounding people IMPACT Controlled and guided Unpredictable and ambient DIRECTION Push Pull
- 51. FUTURE BEHAVIOR PRESENT BEHAVIOR TARGET GROUP
- 52. Persuasive Cities for Sustainable Wellbeing Dr. Agnis Stibe 53 h"p://inspira4on.goreapparel.com/cycling-to-work/
- 54. 120 2014 € 30 000 000 FROM/VON 2010 — TO/BIS 2014 Highlights Radwege-Bauprojekte Wichtige Radprojekte, in den Jahren 2010 bis 2014 umgesetzt: 1: Ottakringer Straße, 2: Ring-Rund-Radweg, 3: Radwege rund um den Hauptbahnhof, 4: Landstraßer Gürtel, 5: Zentrum Meidling, 6: Kagraner Platz, 7: fahrradfreundliche Hasnerstraße Generelle Radverkehrsplanung und Studien Auswahl aus Konzepten und Studien: Radlangstrecken und Lückenschlüsse, befahrbare Haltestellenkaps für RadfahrerInnen, Piktogramme und Pfeile zur Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit, Radfahren gegen die Einbahn 1 2 4 5 6 3 7 Radfahren gegen die Einbahn +16% StVO-Novelle umgesetzt Fahrradstraße: 1.650 m Benutzungspflicht bei Radwegen aufgehoben: 1.970 m Begegnungszonen: 1.200 m Detailplanung Mehr als 600 Einzelmaßnahmen für den (fließenden und ruhenden) Radverkehr pro Jahr, unter breiter interdisziplinärer Beteiligung am Planungs- und Umsetzungsprozess: Dienststellen, Bezirke, Wirtschaftskammer, Polizei etc. (bis zu 30 Beteiligte) Radfahrnetz Citybike-Stationen +96 km 2010 Budget für die Radinfrastruktur Millionen Euro (6 Mio. p.a.) 30 79 2010 Winterdienst 266 km prioritär geräumte Radwege Errichtete Radabstellplätze 2010 +9.588 27.329 Stück 2014 36.917 Stück 2014 1.270 km 1.174 km Radinfrastruktur 2010–2014 Tempo-30-Zonen in Wien Befahrbare Haltestellenkaps für RadfahrerInnen Radlangstrecken Piktogramme und Pfeile zur Erhöhung der Verkehrs- sicherheit Radfahren gegen die Einbahn Modal Split Radverkehr Anteil des Radverkehrs an den zurückgelegten Wegen der Wienerinnen und Wienern 2010: 1.472 km 2014: 1.657 km 4,6% 7,1% 2010 2014 EINBAHN ausgen. 2010 208.790 m ausgen. 242.420 m EINBAHN 2014 Impressum: Magistrat der Stadt Wien, Rathaus, A-1082 Wien, www.verkehr.wien.at
- 60. SOCIALLY INFLUENCING UX SOCIALLY INFLUENCING SYSTEMS / UX
- 79. CT COMPETITION SL LEARNING SC COMPARISON CR COOPERATION NI NORMATIVE SF FACILITATION RE RECOGNITION
- 80. Persuasive Cities for Sustainable Wellbeing Dr. Agnis Stibe 81 Thanks: Matthias Wunsch
- 82. SMART CLASSIFY UNDERSTAND BIG DATA SENSITIVE READ FEEL SENSORS
- 83. PERSUASIVE CHANGE CARE SOCIALLY D INFLUENCING UX SMART CLASSIFY UNDERSTAND BIG DATA SENSITIVE READ FEEL SENSORS UX
- 100. THE WHITE MIRROR TOLD THAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN. IT SAID THERE IS NO OTHER WAY. SOMETHING IS ABOUT TO LAND ON THIS PLANET. SOMETHING UNEXPECTEDLY STRONG AND RESILIENT. THE KINGS WONDERED AND COULD NOT BELIEVE THAT. THE KINGS ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF THE PLANET TRIED TO PULL THEIR HEADS TOGETHER AND FIND A WAY TO PREPARE FOR THE INEVITABLE OCCASION…
- 107. COMPUTER – MEDIATED (CME) FACE–TO–FACE (FTF) COMPUTER – HUMAN (CHU) COMPUTER – MODERATED (CMO) INTERPERSONAL INFLUENCE User behavior User content Dynamic design Dynamic content Persuasive design
- 115. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing INEXPERIENCE Superficializing LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MAJOR SEVERITY MINOR SEVERITY
- 117. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing INEXPERIENCE Superficializing LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MAJOR SEVERITY MINOR SEVERITY
- 119. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng INEXPERIENCE Superficializing LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MAJOR SEVERITY MINOR SEVERITY
- 121. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng Message Hijacking INEXPERIENCE Superficializing LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MAJOR SEVERITY MINOR SEVERITY
- 123. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng Message Hijacking INEXPERIENCE Superficializing POOR JUDGMENT Mistailoring LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MAJOR SEVERITY MINOR SEVERITY
- 125. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng Message Hijacking INEXPERIENCE Superficializing POOR JUDGMENT Mistailoring Mistarge4ng LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MINOR SEVERITY MAJOR SEVERITY
- 127. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng Message Hijacking INEXPERIENCE Superficializing POOR JUDGMENT Mistailoring Mistarge4ng Misdiagnosing LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MINOR SEVERITY MAJOR SEVERITY
- 129. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng Message Hijacking INEXPERIENCE Superficializing POOR JUDGMENT Mistailoring Mistarge4ng Misdiagnosing Misan4cipa4ng LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MINOR SEVERITY MAJOR SEVERITY
- 131. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng Message Hijacking INEXPERIENCE Superficializing POOR JUDGMENT Mistailoring Mistarge4ng Misdiagnosing Misan4cipa4ng SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY An4-Modeling LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MINOR SEVERITY MAJOR SEVERITY
- 133. FINEPRINT FALLACY Overemphasizing PERSONALITY RESPONSES Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing CREDIBILITY DAMAGE Self-Discredi4ng Message Hijacking INEXPERIENCE Superficializing POOR JUDGMENT Mistailoring Mistarge4ng Misdiagnosing Misan4cipa4ng SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY An4-Modeling Reverse Norming LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD MINOR SEVERITY MAJOR SEVERITY
- 135. MINOR SEVERITY MAJOR SEVERITY LOW LIKELIHOOD HIGH LIKELIHOOD Poor Judgment Mistailoring Mistargeting Misdiagnosing Misanticipating Social Psychology Anti-Modeling Reverse Norming Personality Responses Defiance Arousing Self-Licensing Fineprint Fallacy Overemphasizing Inexperience Superficializing Credibility Damage Self-Discrediting Message Hijacking
- 137. SOCIALLY INFLUENCING UX TITLE PROBLEM TARGET CHANGE ENVIRONMENT ATTITUDE BEHAVIOR SOCIALLY INFLUENCING FEATURES UX DESIGN PROPOSALS TECHNOLOGY CHANNELS ETHICS PRIVACY
- 140. SURVEY AND DATA UPLOAD CONFIRM COMMUTING MODE UNIVERSITY-WIDE LIVE DISPLAYS SOCIALLY INFLUENCING SYSTEM competition among schools: modal split per school participation rate per school Fernando Granados and Javier Leal CommuSng
- 141. You used 10 gallons of water while washing your dishes Your sister only used 6 gallons of water Liz Voller Water ConservaSon
- 148. TOP EVALUATORS INVOLVED SPECIALLISTS JĀNIS BĒRZIŅŠ 467 564 EUR Saved 456 Twitter responses Project: GAISMAS PILS
- 150. BEST TWITTER RESPONDERS#BIMSAVESMONEY BEST TWITTER RESPONDERS OF THE MONTH
- 151. Social influence ➢ social learning (good examples) ➢ social comparision (work effeciency) ➢ competition ➢ recognition
- 152. Social Comparison
- 153. Cooperation
- 154. Social Facilitation Project status on project team side. Lets the requester team know what is happening on “the other side”.
- 155. Recognition* ● can be excluded from board if employee wishes so ● facts taken from employee surveys to add a personal touch
- 156. A display in each class
- 157. mummy picture from: www.marthastewart.com Most visited places + dynamic rotating reviews
- 158. Social influence aspects SIS principles that we will incorporate: • Competition • Cooperation • Recognition • Social comparison
- 159. SL SC NI SF CR CT RE SUM Mentor 4 BIM 4 Engage 4 EV 4 Kids 4 1 5 0 1 4 4 5
- 162. AUTONOMOUS UX
- 163. 421 3 5 6 87 109 11 12 13 14
- 164. ARTIFICIAL UX
- 166. SOCIALLY INFLUENCING UX NEXT STEPS
- 167. FUTURE BEHAVIOR PRESENT BEHAVIOR TARGET GROUP