This document discusses the evolution of knowledge management from traditional approaches to more modern social software approaches. It notes that traditional knowledge management failed because it treated knowledge as a transferable good provided centrally without ensuring an audience for sharing. Modern approaches using social software like wikis and blogs have improved knowledge sharing but alone do not solve the problems, as most users only consume information rather than create it. True knowledge management requires voluntary and motivated knowledge sharing when the right audience and context are provided.
17. More than 80 % of all web users
who create content say that the they
do it because they like to
communicate and exchange
information with other people.
IBM/ZEM Study „Innovation in den Medien 2008“
21. …and we don‘t know the
context in which our
knowledge is used.
We only know what we
know when we need to
know it.
We always know more
than we can tell and we
always tell more than we
can write.
David Snowden, ComplexActs of Knowing - Paradox and
Descriptive Self Awareness
22. The old knowledge management
didn‘t care.
1. Write your knowledge into a database.
2. Find an adequate level of detail.
3. Maybe somebody will use your knowledge
some day. And… maybe not.
4. Don‘t spend too much of your time on this!
23. It‘s no surprise
that Lisa has to
set priorities.
I don‘t know if anybody
will ever need my
knowledge.
I don‘t know how
somebody will use my
knowledge.
I‘d rather take care of really
important things.
24. The old knowledge management doesn‘t work,
because it...
• …defines knowledge as a transferable good, which
is centrally provided.
• …demands knowledge-sharing without providing
an audience.
• …wants to manage knowledge.
25. Nach: Wilson, T.D. (2002) "The nonsense of 'knowledge management'" Information Research, 8(1), paper no. 144 [Available at
http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html] Bild: http://www.cgu.edu/images/Drucker/Peter_Drucker/images/PeterDrucker016_jpg.jpg
„You can't manage
knowledge.
Knowledge is
between two ears,
and only between
two ears.“
Peter Drucker
38. Sure it is easier, more intuitive,
and looks better – but it won‘t
guarantee an audience either.
39. Social Software in your business…
1. Write your knowledge into a database, into
the wiki, a blog, [or other Social Software
tool]….
2. Find an adequate level of detail.
3. Maybe somebody will use your knowledge
some day. And… maybe not.
4. Don‘t spend too much of your time on this!
41. Sure, but just 1 % of all web users create
the majority of content.
Quelle:http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia/
Nielsen,2006
The
90-9-1
Rule
1 % of web users
create the majority of
content.
9 % of web users
comment and tag
information.
90 % of web users
only consume
information.
46. Social Media vs. Knowledge Management: A Generational War.
http://enterprise2blog.com/2008/09/social-media-vs-knowledge-management-a-generational-war/
“Knowledge Management and Social
Media look very similar on the surface, but
are actually radically different at multiple
levels, both cultural and technical, and are
locked in an undeclared cultural war
for the soul of Enterprise 2.0.“
47. 1. Sharing knowledge is always
voluntary, no one can ever be
forced.
2. We share knowledge when we
have the right audience, that
motivates us and creates the right
context.
3. Social Software alone is not the
solution to the old problems of
knowledge management.
50. Frank Wolf, Christoph Rauhut, Simone Happ,
Christopher Buschow, Katja Dräger, Christin Büttner
Thanks to: Anne Glas, Holger Günzler, Dada Lin, Jana Frommhold, Ricarda Köckler