Destiny Review Rebuttal Doomsday: The Rebuttal Essay Rebuttal Outline Essay Essay on Objections and Rebuttals Essay about Article Rebuttal Article Rebuttal Affirmative Rebuttal

1. Destiny Review Rebuttal
Jacob Gornall GS 1001 Dr. Ferrell 01/12/2016 Destiny Review Rebuttal Destiny was one of the
most anticipated games of 2014 and it was hyped up to be Bungie's next masterpiece. This was
Bungie's take on borderlands, which I mean let's be real, Borderlands 2 was a knock out,
especially compared to Destiny. "Graphically, Destiny is truly a beautiful and diverse looking
game, especially when you explore the planets opposed to the downtrodden atmosphere of Earth.
Whether it's the lush forests of Venus or the red deserts of Mars"(Impulse Gamer Admin, 2014).
The graphics are amazing and the worlds are beautiful, but you are really given little reason to
explore at all once you get the 5 chests on each planet you're done, there's really no reason
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Doomsday: The Rebuttal Essay
The world has to end because it began. How the world will end has been the center of heated
discussions. The topic of Doomsday has produced conferences, meetings, movies and books
attempting to prophesy the end of age. With the emergence of Doomsday prophets have also
emerged fallacies that preach propaganda to audiences of those seeking immunity from one sole
apocalyptic day. One author in particular is Ronald Bailey. According to Forbes.com, Ronald
Bailey has been a science writer for Forbes magazine and wrote an essay called Seven Doomsday
Myths About The Environment. Bailey wrote this essay in response to fallacies concerning
Doomsday. In his essay he attempts to identify fallacies that are present in seven of the most common
...show more content...
Bailey does this by, illustrating the Ad Hominem fallacy tactic. The Ad Hominem fallacy is
committed when the "arguer ignores the merits of his/her opponent's argument, and rather makes
some reference to the arguer himself/herself, and assumes that this somehow discredits the
argument" (qtd. in Hurley 119) this is a way to discredit the opponent. Bailey debunks Doomsday
Myths by repeatedly ignoring the merits of his opponent. For illustration Bailey stated, "the gloomy
prognostications by the likes of Paul Ehrlich, Lester Brown, Al Gore, Stephen Schneider, andCarl
Sagan. There is no scientific evidence to support the often heard claim that there is a global
ecological crisis threatening humanity and life on the entire Planet Earth." (Bailey). He then follows
up with more discredit by stating repeatedly in his rebuttal to his opponents claims by stating "False
Doomsday Prediction" and "what really happened" (Bailey), as part of his oppositional statement.
This tactic debunks the data that was presented by the Doomsday claimant as false, incorrect, and
unfounded. Statements such as this are an attempt to insinuate to the reader that the claims that were
made by the Doomsdayer's are false and Bailey's claims are true. In addition, Bailey himself circums
to the use of Appeal to Unqualified Authority fallacy in his arguments to Doomsday fallacies.
According to The Appeal To Unqualified Authority
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Rebuttal Outline Essay
REBUTTAL FORM OF PERSUASION The purpose of this paper is to argue against those
perpetrators who are committing human rights violations against an oppressed group of people
who are unable to defend themselves against the abuses. To defend the victims, you must know
why and how the perpetrators are oppressing the group of victims and why these abuses are
wrong. Your paper will be organized according to the rebuttal format for persuasion. This paper is
organized the same way your persuasive paper last year was organized. Make sure you follow the
form below for this paper. This format is required; it is not an option. Even though there are many
forms of persuasion, we are learning the rebuttal format. I.Introduction a.Tell...show more content...
They support your position. This is where you make your strongest case. i.Present an argument in
support of your position. Prove it by using 1.facts to show proof by induction 2.syllogisms for
deduction 3.examples 4.reasons 5.quotes ii. Present an argument in support of your position.
Prove it by using the above. iii. Present an argument in support of your position. Prove it by using
the above. III.Conclusion a.Restate your position on the issue. b.Conclude with an emotional
appeal for your position. What will happen if we don't listen to your suggestions? Predict the
future for your victims. c.AND/OR give your readers a call to action. What should they be doing
to resolve this issue? IV.Works cited a.Evidence should be cited in your text. See the MLA
Stylebook for help. b.Follow MLA style for creating your works cited page. c.Don't forget to cite all
Internet sources. V.Essay Parameters a.Essay Length: 1200–1600 words (not including work cited)
b.Number of arguments: At least three rebuttal arguments and one defense. c.Number of CITED
sources: At least three different kinds of credible sources (Example: a website, a magazine, a
newspaper) d.Due Dates: See Angel Reminders Use the vocabulary of your topic. Choose words that
have emotional connotation to help your cause. Create an interesting and original introduction and
conclusion. Try to use rhetorical
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Essay on Objections and Rebuttals
Objections and Rebuttals Whenever a customer has an objection to the offer or price, the problem
is not that offer or the price it is actually that we as advocates have failed to build enough value in
the product to justify the price. So in actuality the reason for the objection more often than not is that
the customer is telling us that they are not willing to pay $19.95/$24.99 at this moment. The best
way to combat this is to use an intelligent and informed rebuttal, do this by keeping the conversation
going don't get flustered or aggravated Listen Think & Respond. Show empathy with the customer
let them know you are here to solve their problem, remember we have to make the customers
objections seem miniscule and offer a reasonable...show more content...
It's a win win situation you can't loose with this offer." If the customer still says they don't have a
card we have to give them every option available such as "Is there someone there that understands
what your going through that could let you use their card and you could give them the cash?" or
"Is there someone that you can call to help you out with this I don't mind holding while we figure
this out?" This particular objection can seem tough at first again DONT GET FRUSTRATED
display your dedication in finding a solution for the customer. Objection: "I'm going to think about
it" this particular objection should make our blood boil. What's to think about after talking to a
knowledgeable advocate such as yourself, Right? Rebuttal: " I totally understand but don't you agree
that the best way to think about this product is to actually use it in your home and get real time
results, because that is exactly what this Risk–Free promotion is about" or "I totally understand but
let's be honest with ourselves are you really going to go home and think about having clear skin?
We all know life is hectic and putting this off will only make that clear and healthy skin be further
out of your reach we are halfway there its time to take control" remember some of these customers
are very indecisive we need to be the deciding factor in the phone call and we do this by displaying
confidence in our rebuttals. Objection: "I need to talk to" this is usually just the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Essay about Article Rebuttal
APA Format:
Article Rebuttal
Lori M. Slack
BCOM/275
February 17, 2014
Rod Klein
Article Rebuttal
Marriage is not about a piece of paper, a ring, or sexual preference. It has never been about any of
these matters, and should not be considered so. Marriage is the commitment between two people
who love each other unconditionally. According to Psychology Today, "marriage is the process
by which two people who love each other make their relationship public, official, and permanent"
(Psychology Today, 2002) . Anyone can get married, but it takes dedication and work to make a
marriage last and be successful. This paper will specifically discuss an article written by Jan LaRue,
Why Homosexual "Marriage" Is Wrong and what...show more content...
In saying this she is being selective to support her argument, and in doing so is being confirmation
biased. Who is to say that homosexuality is more unholy, or wrong, than divorce, adultery, and lying?
Logical Fallacies
The fallacy that was used in this article is false attribution because of the biased attributes in the
argument. For example, saying that marriage has to be limited to only a man and a woman is not
discriminating, yet it clearly is because of the biased feelings of homosexual relationships.
Another type of fallacy that was used is the fallacy of ambiguity; when an abstract belief is treated
as if it were concrete evidence. Religion is not based on scientific concrete evidence, but merely a
belief in something. The Bible has been written and rewritten by man, and has lack of evidence
supporting that there is a God.
Conclusion
Many base their idea of right and wrong on biased conclusions and/or religion. This makes the
issue hard to decipher between who is right and wrong. Biased conclusions do not make the idea
correct. The idea that only a man and a woman can fall in love with each other, and not a man and a
man or a woman and a woman, is based on favoritisms in how someone feels about the issue.
Articles, such as the one above, have the intentions of sharing their beliefs in the hope of others
adopting that particular belief. The question that should be presented is,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Article Rebuttal
Article Rebuttal Maybelline Torres University of Phoenix BCOM/275 April 17, 2012 Prof. Lourdes
LebrГіn BayrГіn Article Rebuttal In this article rebuttal an analysis will take place on the authors,
reliability, credibility, and validity on the account of Noah's flood. The rebuttal will give emphasis
on the claims young earth creationist have on the earth's existence period. Additionally, address old
earth and young earth theories. Finally identify any fallacies in the argument. For centuries creation
theorists have given emphasis to Noah's flood as enough evidence to a universal deluge.
Nevertheless, it is understood the ark presented in the Bible had a higher credibility to a local flood.
According...show more content...
The following claim states that it can give evidence that all animals and humans originated from
occupants of the ark. The people could have descended from the ark inhabitants, but scientist lack
evidence on the animals descending from the ark. Finding the ark does not give evidence of the
ancestry of all creatures. One way to refute this is consider the Koala in Australia. How did this
earthly animal travel to Australia once the ark settled? Traveling this distance would be impossible
nevertheless because the flood was local Koalas did not need to be on the ark. Furthermore, the
author asserts that locating ark remains forces paleontologists to re–decipher fossils as an effect of
the flood, not of many years buildup. Old–earth creationists relates fully with the geological proof of
the arks old age existence. There are no findings of the ark, although several informants alleged to
have seen it. In reality the ark will never be located, most likely it no longer exists. Noah maybe
used the ark wood for rebuilding the society. God declared to Noah never again would He destroy
the world with water. Noah was clear he had no use for the ark maybe he dismantled it for
constructing material. Moreover, creation theorists Baumgardner, and Barnett claim after the flood
the land would have resembled a lifeless wilderness deprived of trees and plants. If the plant and tree
seeds floated after the flood it would still take many years
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

7. Affirmative Rebuttal
I was part of the rebuttal for the Negative Team. My part of the argument was to rebut the
Affirmative Team's point that the First Amendment rendered the school rule unconstitutional.
However, I argued that the school rule was not unconstitutional, as it had not broken any part of the
First Amendment by only asking the students to be quiet while the anthem played. Additionally, I
turned the argument on them during the rebuttal, by proving why Philip was being a disturbance,
and the First Amendment's freedom of speech could not protect him, as freedom of speech is
defined as the legal right to express one's opinion freely. The three main points introduced by the
other team included that Narwin was unjust and biased, Philip has the right to freedom...show more
content...
I projected by voice to be louder, and I believe that I spoke at a fairly moderate pace and emphasized
when necessary. In my rebuttal, I also used the book and also used a dictionary to help support the
arguments that I made. I also used a real–world example in our classroom, when I discussed how
Ms. Breault was not violating our rights to the First Amendment when she tells us to quiet down.
However, I could have improved on certain aspects of my argument. I feel like my argument did
not completely address their argument, and there were still aspects of their argument that were
left unrebutted. The Supreme Court case was a point I did not specifically address, but it was
still a very powerful part of that argument. Additionally, I believe that I could have used some
more analysis in my rebuttal. I was very brief about commentary on why the rule did not violate
the First Amendment, and I could have directed the rebuttal more on Philip and blamed him even
more, making our case stronger and their case weaker. Overall, I felt that this debate was quite
interesting, as the Affirmative Team still put up a fight and introduced some very excellent points
and evidence I would have never thought of, although I am certain most, if not all, of us agreed
with the Negative side before this debate started. By this debate, I learned several aspects of a
debate and how a debate is structured overall. I also learned what makes a strong argument in a
debate: powerful evidence, convincing evidence, and no holes. I had a great experience doing this
debate, and I find it unfortunate we will not have time to do another one this school
Get more content on HelpWriting.net