Second Midterm Linguistics

1. Second Midterm
Linguistics
Evaluation based on the application of
linguistics concepts on pedagogical practice.

2. Girls’ Team
• Teaching: 5 points
• Lesson Planning: 4 points
• Materials:5
• Linguistic Application:5
• Defense: 5
Most of the class was successful; however, the transitions in the activities were no the best. There were
activities in the lesson plan that were not applied during the class. I have to add that the use of
games were a really good idea.
In case of Landy, Maricarmen, Yazuri and Sabrina, I have to say that being this your first teaching in front
of the class, you did it really good and the improvement is noticeable in your tone of voice and
guidance.
The defense team should be proud of themselves due to the fact that you were excellent at pointing out
the concepts of Linguistics and because you were involved in lesson planning when it was not
necessarily your obligation
I hope that all of you ladies have learnt something from this activity. And that all the inconvenient
situations won’t be repeated in the future.
Final Grade: 95
Note: (this grade goes in order to benefit everyone who worked hard; if I were totally fair I would have
failed you all. I am trying to be positive about this)

3. Boys’ Team
• Teaching: 5
• Lesson Planning:5
• Materials:5
• Linguistic Application:5
• Defense: 5
Your class was really good and it was fun. I liked the introduction to the class, and the
fact of making it real by using Daniel’s character together with the inmates.
I liked the speaking production activities including the inmates. I would have liked to
see another one of you teaching (maybe another policeman). Marzoa’s activity
was good but quite fast. However the teaching process went well.
Jacob’s defense, with his own personality and touch, was good and fulfilled what I
wanted for this lesson.
Good Job!
Final Grade: 100