Más contenido relacionado La actualidad más candente (16) Similar a Comparative study on e government (20) Comparative study on e government1. TWINNING LIGHT BA06-IB-JH-03-TL
IDDEA EU Cards Twinning Programme
Š™ŠŒ’¢ ž’•’— ˜ ‘Ž ’›ŽŒ˜›ŠŽ ˜›
’’£Ž— Ž—’’ŒŠ’˜— ›˜ŽŒ’˜—
¢œŽ– ˜œ—’Š Š—
Ž›£Ž˜Ÿ’—Š
Œ’Ÿ’¢ ›Š—’œŠ’˜—Š• ›Š–Ž ˜›”
˜ ˜–™Š›Š’ŸŽ œž¢ Š—
Œ˜––ž—’ŒŠ’˜— Š–™Š’—
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
1
2. Œ˜™Ž ˜ ‘Ž ˜Œž–Ž—
Š‹•Ž ˜ Š‹‹›ŽŸ’Š’˜—œ
Ž—Ž›Š• ˜ŸŽ›Ÿ’Ž ˜— ‘Ž ŠŽ—Œ¢ ’—›˜žŒ’˜—
œ›žŒž›Ž
4.1 CIPS centre of Sarajevo.......................................................................................................................14
4.2 CIPS centre of Banja Luka...................................................................................................................14
4.3 Cooperation mechanisms with other institutional bodies....................................................................15
4.4 CIPS information system......................................................................................................................15
4.5 CIPS information system......................................................................................................................15
Š ˜›Š—’£Š’˜—
5.1 Organisation and management............................................................................................................17
ŽŒž›’¢ Š››Š—Ž–Ž—œ ™˜•’Œ’Žœ
6.1 (Risks and mitigation measures)..........................................................................................................20
˜–™Š›Š’ŸŽ ŠŠ ‹Ž ŽŽ— ˜œ—’Š Š—
Ž›£Ž˜Ÿ’—Š œ˜—’Š Š— Š•¢
7.1 National Progress Report on e-Government in the EU27+.................................................................27
7.2 EU Benchmark Survey of 2007............................................................................................................27
7.3 New e-Government user satisfaction and user impact project in the European Union.....................31
‘Ž Ž¡™Ž›’Ž—ŒŽ ’— Š•¢
8.1 Political Structure..................................................................................................................................32
8.2 Information Society Indicators..............................................................................................................32
8.3 State of e-government implementation in Italy....................................................................................33
8.3.1 E-democracy.....................................................................................................................................34
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
2
3. 8.3.2 M-Government..................................................................................................................................34
8.4 The Ministry for Public Administration and Innovation........................................................................34
8.5 CNIPA Presentation..............................................................................................................................35
8.6 CNIPA Activities....................................................................................................................................36
8.7 The role of Regional Centres for e-Government and Information Society (CRC)..............................37
8.8 The main Italian e-government databases ..........................................................................................38
8.8.1 Connection to the databank of the Tax Register through Siatel.....................................................38
8.8.2 Connection to the databank of the territorial agency through SISTer............................................39
8.8.3 Connection to the databank of the Chambers of Commerce with InfoCamere and Registro
Imprese (Telemaco).......................................................................................................................................39
8.8.4 Online Consip purchase service......................................................................................................40
8.9 E-government between Central Public Administration (PAC) and Small Enterprises.......................40
8.10 Future trends of E-Government in Italy................................................................................................41
8.10.1 2007 Report Submitted to the Parliament on the Progress of the Public Administration.........41
8.10.2 Public Administration Digitalization and the Relationships with the Citizens............................42
8.10.3 The Guide-lines for Legislation....................................................................................................42
8.10.4 SPC – The System for Public Connectivity.................................................................................43
8.10.5 VoIP for Rapid Saving .................................................................................................................44
8.10.6 Beyond CAD.................................................................................................................................44
8.10.7 The First Initiatives at International Level ...................................................................................44
8.10.8 The Re-launch of Cooperation with Developing Countries and Emerging Countries...............45
8.10.9 Collaboration under the EU and OECD in PA Innovation and Modernization..........................45
8.11 CISIS – Inter-regional Centre for IT, Geographic and Statistical Systems .......................................45
‘Ž Ž¡™Ž›’Ž—ŒŽ ’— œ˜—’Š
9.1 Political structure...................................................................................................................................49
9.2 Information Society Indicators..............................................................................................................49
9.3 Introduction to E-governance in Estonia..............................................................................................50
9.4 Transforming Estonia into E-Stonia .....................................................................................................51
9.5 E-governance Legislation.....................................................................................................................52
9.6 E-governance Organizational Framework...........................................................................................54
9.7 E-Government Initiatives ......................................................................................................................55
9.8 E-services..............................................................................................................................................55
9.8.1 E-Government Portal........................................................................................................................56
9.8.2 Electronic Riigi Teataja.....................................................................................................................56
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
3
4. 9.8.3 Public Procurement..........................................................................................................................57
9.8.4 Customs eSystems...........................................................................................................................58
9.8.5 e-Tax Board......................................................................................................................................58
9.8.6 Land Information System.................................................................................................................59
9.9 Other e-Systems...................................................................................................................................61
9.9.1 Estonian Government of Ministers Session Infosystem.................................................................61
9.9.2 E-State Treasury...............................................................................................................................61
9.9.3 Centre of Registers of the Ministry of Justice..................................................................................62
9.9.4 Services of the Court Settlements Register ....................................................................................62
9.10 Target Programmes and Projects........................................................................................................62
9.10.1 Document Management ..............................................................................................................62
9.10.2 X-Road..........................................................................................................................................63
9.10.3 ID Card.........................................................................................................................................67
9.10.4 Digital Signature...........................................................................................................................68
9.10.5 Citizen’s IT Environment..............................................................................................................68
9.10.6 E-Justice Project..........................................................................................................................69
9.10.7 E-County Project..........................................................................................................................70
9.10.8 E-Voting........................................................................................................................................70
9.11 E-Governance Academy, a referent institution in Estonia..................................................................70
9.12 Key Success Factors and Future Plans...............................................................................................71
9.13 History of Data Protection in ESTONIA...............................................................................................73
9.14 Data Protection Inspectorate................................................................................................................73
9.14.1 Area of activity of the Inspectorate..............................................................................................74
9.14.2 Structure and Principal functions of structural units...................................................................75
9.15 European Projects:................................................................................................................................78
9.16 The AS Sertifitseerimiskeskus (SK Certificate Centre).......................................................................79
9.17 E-government: The Estonian Government examines the Italian Model.............................................80
—’’Š’ŸŽœ Š— ž—’— •’—Žœ
10.1 IDABC Programme...............................................................................................................................82
10.2 E-content Plus.......................................................................................................................................82
10.3 VII Framework Programme – Cooperation Programme (2007-2013) ................................................82
10.4 The Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP).................................................83
10.4.1 Information Communication Technologies Policy support Programme (ICT PSP) ..................83
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
4
5. 10.5 Looking for a European Standard for e-Government..........................................................................83
œŽž• ’—”œ ˜› œ˜—’Š
œŽž• ’—”œ ˜› Š•¢
œŽž• ’—”œ ˜›
’‹•’˜›Š™‘¢
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
5
6. Œ˜™Ž ˜ ‘Ž ˜Œž–Ž—
The first part of this document, drawn up within the Twinning Light Bosnia-Herzegovina project “Capacity
Building of the Directorate for CIPS (Citizen Identification Protection System)”, aims to provide an assessment
on the CIPS organization, structure and the functions performed by the agency.
The second part of the document has been structured as a comparative study concerning e-government
between Bosnia-Herzegovina, Estonia and Italy. The reason why Italy and Estonia were chosen is because
Italy was selected as Twinning partner in order to strengthen the Capacity Building of the Directorate for CIPS,
while Estonia because it represents a best practice in Europe and also hosted a study visit from the BiH
partners.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
6
7. Š‹•Ž ˜ Š‹‹›ŽŸ’Š’˜—œ
BiH
CIPS Citizen Identification Protection System
MIA Ministry of Internal Affairs
DGS National Boarder Police
SIPA State Investigation and Protection Agency
NOC / MOC Network Operation System / Mrezni operativni system
MUP Ministarstvo unutrasnjih poslova / Ministry of Interior
MIP Ministarstvo inostranih poslova / Ministry of External Affairs
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
7
8. Ž—Ž›Š• ˜ŸŽ›Ÿ’Ž ˜— ‘Ž ŠŽ—Œ¢ ’—›˜žŒ’˜—
As BiH has entered the process of European integrations, pursuant to European Regulations #2252/2004
dated December 2004, 6WDQGDUGV IRU 6HFXULW )HDWXUHV DQG %LRPHWULFV LQ 3DVVSRUWV DQG 7UDYHO 'RFXPHQWV
issued by EU Member States have been defined. The above-mentioned Regulation in its Article 3, paragraph
2 defines that any member state shall establish an institution that will deal with development and coordination
of the development of the system for passports and travel docs with other member states and while doing so,
follow the relevant standards. This role has been given to the Ministry for Civil Affairs but considering
capacities of the same, BiH Council of Ministers established the Directorate for Implementation of CIPS
Project (CIPS Directory) as an autonomous body within the Ministry for Civil Affairs.
Importantly, in 2001 BiH initiated the process for reform of issuance of personal documents, what made it
necessary for Directorate of Implementation of CIPS Project to evolve in an administrative organization in
accordance with the mentioned Regulations.
According to the provision IV, 4 a) of the Constitution of BiH, in July 2008, BiH Parliamentary Assembly
adopted the Law on Agency for Identification Documents, Register Data Exchange of Bosnia and
Herzegovina. This Law in entirety amends the Law on Central Register and Data Exchange of Bosnia and
Herzegovina («Official Gazette BiH» No. 32/01). Namely, the Chapter 2 of this Law defines the establishment
of the Central Centre for Data Processing as the sector of the Ministry of Civil Affairs.
The grounds for adoption of the mentioned Law are the scope and character of activities performed by the
existing Directorate for Implementation of CIPS Project as a body with the higher level of expertise and
dominant application of expert and scientifically methods of work and related administrative jobs.
Unfortunately, organisational problems of Directorate, reflected in the internal audit report for 2005, as well as
failed attempt to establish the Agency for Information Society, which would be linked to CIPS Directorate, has
caused this project to fail.
The CIPS Agency was established on basis of the following laws:
x Law on Personal Identification Number;
x Law on Domicile and Place of Residence of BiH citizens;
x Law on Personal Identification;
x Law on Protection of Personal Data;
x Law on Central Register and Data Exchange.
2QJRLQJ VLWXDWLRQ DQG IXWXUH GHYHORSPHQW
The recently adopted Law on Agency for Identification Documents, Registers and Data Exchange of Bosnia
and Herzegovina has initiated number of changes within CIPS Agency. Management of the CIPS Agency is
currently developing the new organizational structure that will reflect the mentioned changes.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
8
9. 7KH ,36 DJHQF PDQGDWH
The CIPS Agency is an autonomous administrative organisation within the Ministry of Civil Affairs of Bosnia
and Herzegovina responsible for the area of identification documents, storage, personalisation and transport of
documents, and central keeping of registers and exchange of data between the relevant organs in Bosnia and
Herzegovina.
As the newly adopted Law on Agency for Identification Documents, Registers and Data Exchange of BiH
states that the CIPS Agency is responsible for all activities related to identification documents, registers and
exchange of personal data. CIPS Agency cooperates with the relevant institutions that are the source of data
in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as with other institutions/agencies, which are the users of Agency’s
services.
For its mandate CIPS Agency must act solely on professional basis, without representing, protecting, or
subverting the interests of any political party, registered organisation or associations, nor any of the three
constitutive or other nationalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Altho ug h the Ag enc y w a s e sta b lished a s a tem p o ra ry b o d y w ho se ro le w a s to b e
term ina ted up o n im p le m enta tio n o f the CIPS Pro jec t, the Ag e nc y’ s a c tivitie s sinc e
2001 a s w ell a s va rio us la w s, m em o ra nd a a nd d ec isio ns o f the c o unc il o f Ministe r’ s
ha ve turne d w o rk o f this b o d y to p erm a nent sta tus.
)81',1*
The earlier mentioned Law on Agency for Identification Documents, Registers and Data Exchange of BiH
defines that the funds necessary to finance operation of the Agency will be provided from the Budget of the
Institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina and international obligations of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The income of the Agency, generated by collecting defined fees for issuing of the identification documents and
other realized fees for Agency’s services, will constitute the Budget revenues.
The Council of Ministers if Bosnia and Herzegovina, at the proposal of the Agency, will define the price of
identification documents, other documents and services.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
9
10. œ›žŒž›Ž
As mentioned above, the main Agency’s offices (NOC) are located in:
1. Sarajevo
2. Banja Luka
The recently adopted Law on Agency for Identification Documents, Registers and Data Exchange of BiH has
defined the main office of the Agency moving from Sarajevo in Banja Luka what will cause changes of the
current staffing structure.
The basic organisational units of the Agency will be located out of the seat. Organisational unit of the Agency
out of its seat is the Centre for Storage, Personalisation and Transport of Personal Documents with the seat in
Banja Luka.
6FKHPH RI WKH $JHQF¶V UHODWLRQVKLSV ZLWK H[WHUQDO XVHUV
x “P location” is the Center or Personalization of Documents.
x “D locations” are the main location for each canton/ District Brcko / RS regional office. These locations are
responsible for work of their “C locations”. There is one “D locations” in each of 10 Cantons, 9 locations of
Republika Srpska (following its geographical scope) as well as 1 location in District Brcko. These
locations serve as administrative offices of CIPS i.e. link between “C locations” and CIPS.
x “C locations” are the “grassroots” locations i.e. offices within municipalities where the final project
beneficiaries submit their requests and collect finalized documents. There are 100 “C locations” in 97
municipalities of BiH.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
10
11. 11
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
PRNJAVOR NEUM
LAKTASI MOSTAR
KOTOR VAROS KONJIC
KNEZEVO JABLANICA
GRADISKA CITLUK
CELINAC CAPLJINA 083 +1. 0267$5
/8.$
BANJA LUKA 083 56 -% %$1-$
GORAZDE 083 %3. *25$='(
6536.$ 5(38%/,.$ %L+ )('(5$,-$
The following table lists D and C locations that cooperate with CIPS Agency:
0DS ZLWK 1202 ORFDWLRQ DQG ³' ORFDWLRQV´
RQ D C R P
eV ``p •
P UFpsrd4q
T •
D ai Y C YQ
b¤G`e!W •
Fc T
`b!h •
!¦bbt
R Sv FP T •
MOC
T u RQ F P F
U`eU¦Uer
T V
Uu D`W •
!UI
RW F •
a U¦p
D V u FP
•
a GU`f
D V P T u • F D VR
`g !`f • S F P t DQ V T a P
U¦G!eGdBq •
!`¦!p
FWfY •
Q TC T
G`bUS • H F
GGE D!C
F DQ W R D
¦V e``eQ `C • •
T ac P
d¦U`C • F a Y W FQ V F
G`XUC
P T SR D P
GU!¤Q I •
RQ F P
e¤ib¦GT •
12. PROZOR/RAMA SRBAC
STOLAC BIJELJINA
083 56 -%
BOSANSKO GRAHOVO LOPARE
%,-(/-,1$
DRVAR UGLJEVIK
GLAMOC BROD
083 . /,912
KUPRES DERVENTA
LIVNO DOBOJ
TOMISLAVGRAD MODRICA
HADZICI 083 56 -% '2%2- PELAGICEVO
ILIDZA PETROVO
ILIJAS SAMAC
NOVO SARAJEVO TESLIC
083 .6 6$5$-(92 SARAJEVO CENTAR VUKOSAVLJE
SARAJEVO NOVI GRAD CAJNICE
SARAJEVO STARI GRAD FOCA
TRNOVO-FBIH KALINOVIK
083 56 6-% )2$
VOGOSCA NOVO GORAZDE
DOMALJEVAC RUDO
083 25$6-( ODZAK VISEGRAD
ORASJE HAN PIJESAK
BUGOJNO ISTOCNO SARAJEVO
BUSOVACA PS ISTOCNO SARAJEVO
083 56 -%
DOBRETICI ,67212 ROGATICA
6$5$-(92
DONJI VAKUF SOKOLAC
FOJNICA TRNOVO
GORNJI VAKUF/USKOPLJE CJB ISTOCNO SARAJEVO
083 6%. 75$91,.
JAJCE ISTOCNI DRVAR
KISELJAK JEZERO
KRESEVO KUPRES-RS
083 56 6-%
NOVI TRAVNIK MRKONJIC GRAD
05.21-, *5$'
TRAVNIK PETROVAC
VITEZ RIBNIK
083 7. 78=/$ BANOVICI SIPOVO
CELIC 083 56 6-% KOSTAJNICA
35,-('25
DOBOJ ISTOK KOZARSKA DUBICA
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
12
13. GRACANICA KRUPA NA UNI
GRADACAC NOVI GRAD
KALESIJA OSTRA LUKA
KLADANJ PRIJEDOR
LUKAVAC BERKOVICI
SAPNA BILECA
SREBRENIK 083 56 -%
GACKO
75(%,1-(
TEOCAK LJUBINJE
TUZLA NEVESINJE
ZIVINICE TREBINJE
BIHAC BRATUNAC
BOSANSKA KRUPA MILICI
BOSANSKI PETROVAC 083 56 6-%
SREBRENICA
=9251,.
BUZIM SEKOVICI
083 86. %,+$
CAZIN VLASENICA
KLJUC ZVORNIK
SANSKI MOST
VELIKA KLADUSA
BREZA
DOBOJ JUG ',675,.7 %5.2
KAKANJ
9/$'$ %5.2
MAGLAJ ',675,.7$ -$91, JAVNI REGISTAR
5(*,67$5 %5.2
OLOVO
TESANJ
083 ='. =(1,$
USORA
VARES
VISOKO
ZAVIDOVICI
ZENICA
ZEPCE
GRUDE
083 =+=.
LJUBUSKI
/-8%86.,
POSUSJE
SIROKI BRIJEG
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
13
14. ,36 FHQWUH RI 6DUDMHYR
Currently, the main office of the CIPS Agency is located in Sarajevo, inside of the BiH Parliamentary building.
Both the main functions of the Agency and the main Network Operation Center are located in the main office in
Sarajevo.
The main functions of the main office is to provide:
x Nomenclatures (naming specifications) ?
x Acquisition of data
x PIN
x Domicile-place of residence
x Personal Identification
x Driving licenses
x Registration of vehicles
x Travel documents
x Personalisation of documents
x Distribution of documents
x Development of projects
x Development of application software
x Purchase of IT equipment
x Installation
x Communications
x Testing
x Data security an protection
x Education of approx. 750 officers
x Organisation of SW and HW
x Provision of operating supplies
,36 FHQWUH RI %DQMD /XND
The second Network Operation Center (NOC), location where the data is replicated from the main site, is
located in Banja Luka. This is also where location of the “Centre for personalization of Documents”, location
where new documents are personalized following requests of BiH citizens.
The types of documents personalized in Banja Luka are:
x Personal identifications
x Driving licenses
x Travel documents
x Personal identifications for non-residents (foreign citizens)
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
14
15. RRSHUDWLRQ PHFKDQLVPV ZLWK RWKHU LQVWLWXWLRQDO ERGLHV
Roles and responsibilities for maintenance of network/databases
[…]
Regional and local institution roles:
x C locations
x D locations
According to the CIPS Agency’s report for 2007, during this year was initiated process for transfer of data
through web services meaning that access to data would be enabled to some legal bodies after those fulfill
certain conditions, mostly related to personal security of data and also to follow the procedures set by the
CIPS network team. External users that have fulfilled the mentioned conditions have received needed
instructions.
The “external users “of the CIPS system are:
x Education institutions
x Statistics offices
x Register offices
x Army
x Police
x Border Police
x Custom offices
x Judiciary system
x Insurance Bureau BiH
x Bank
x Tax administration
x Other offices as defined by the Law.
,36 LQIRUPDWLRQ VVWHP
The CIPS information system is composed of four modules or subsystems:
x Place of Residence, Personal Identification Number, and Personal Identification Documents
x Driving Licenses
x Travel Documents
x Vehicle Registration
,36 ,QWHUQDWLRQDO DFWLYLWLHV
Besides these responsibilities, Directorate CIPS was direct or indirect partner in the implementation of some
CARDS projects like the ones listed below:
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
15
17. $5'6
The goal of the project was to construct and implement a Migration Information System for the government of
Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH). At the Network Operational Centre (NOC) in Sarajevo, the central database is
stored and a mirror of this database is located in NOC Banja Luka. In all the other locations it’s possible to
connect to the central database and relevant information will be entered into the database and it is possible to
see the status of the procedures a foreigner is processing in BIH. The MIS provides information that assist the
parties involved to manage migration information, data collection, processing and dissemination by keeping
records of the stay and movement of aliens who have been admitted to BIH, including :
x All residence permits that have been issued by the MoS
x Foreign nationals that have been admitted to BIH with visas
x Foreign nationals who have been ordered to leave BIH and/or been put under supervision until
they are removed
x Foreign nationals who have entered BIH as a result of a readmission agreement
x A file tracking system for the administrative decisions related to aliens
x The MIS will be integrated with other national information systems
6QFKURQRXV 'LJLWDO +LHUDUFK 6'+ FRPPXQLFDWLRQ QHWZRUN $5'6
This telecommunication network system improved coordination between institutional units that are responsible
for the provision of security measures by using digital exchange of information, access to central databases
and access through integrated communications. This project removed organizational and operative problems
surrounding the use of confidential information and ensured that the use and exchange of information was
more secure.
6XSSRUW WR WKH 2IILFH RI WKH RRUGLQDWRU IRU 3XEOLF $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ 5HIRUP
(1.5 MEUR) - CARDS 2004
This project assisted the PAR Coordination Office with the drawing-up and implementation of a comprehensive
nation-wide PAR strategy. In addition, the project also built-up the capacity of the PARCO; particularly in the
area of PAR policy making and coordination and procurement of PAR projects through the newly established
PAR fund, which pools funds from DfID, Sida and the Dutch Government.
H *RYHUQPHQW 0 (852 18. $5'6
This project was aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the Council of Ministers BIH through the introduction and
utilization of a comprehensive and crosscutting set of ICT tools and solutions, as well as through necessary re-
engineering of Council of Ministries BiH-CoM business processes.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
16
19. Š ˜›Š—’£Š’˜—
The Law defines that internal affairs of the CIPS Agency will be defined by the Rulebook on Internal
Organisation and Systematisation of the Agency. The Rulebook will regulate internal organisation of the
Agency, including job descriptions, number, name and locations of the basic organizational units. The Agency
will hire “civil servants” whose employment will be governed by the Law on Civil Service in BiH Institutions and
“other employees” whose employment will be governed by the Labor Law in BiH Institutions. Structure of
employees will reflect national structure and take care of gender equality.
The Law on Agency for Identification Documents, Registers and Data Exchange of BiH has defined the roles
and responsibilities as well as other details related to the Managing Director and Deputy Managing Director of
CIPS Agency.
2UJDQLVDWLRQ DQG PDQDJHPHQW
The standards of the functioning of the Centre, as well as all other matters relevant for the functioning of the
Centre, are stipulated by by-laws enacted by the Council of Ministers, at the proposal of the Director of the
Agency, while internal organisation and systematisation of jobs in the Centre shall be stipulated by the
Rulebook on Internal Organisation and Systematisation of the Agency.
CIPS
The current organizational chart of the
CIPS Agency is composed by the Director
following roles:
x Managing director Director’s Office
x Deputy director
x Managers of the Technical Sector Sector for Finance, Center for Storage,
Legal, HR and Personalization and
Organisational units (Sectors) General Issues Transport of Docs
x Departments within the Dept for Administration Dept for Legal, Dept for Storage Dept for Standardization
Sectors and Development
Sarajevo
HR and
General Issues
and Personalization
of Docs
and Security of Docs
Dept for System Dept for Finance Dept for Distribution Dept for Administration
Protection and and Procurement and Transport and Development
Logistics of Docs Banja Luka
Dept for Maintenance
and Internal Security
or Premises
0DQDJLQJ 'LUHFWRU
The Managing Director manages the Agency’s operations and is responsible towards the Ministers of the
Council of Ministers for the performance of the Agency and his work.
Director of Agency have the following duties and responsibilities:
x To represent the Agency;
x To produce the annual plan of work in accordance with the guidelines of the Ministry and Council of
Ministers, and other plans concerning the competence of the Agency;
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
17
20. x To produce the Annual Budget Plan, in accordance with the Law of Financing of the Institutions of
Bosnia and Herzegovina;
x To manage and direct the performance of the tasks under the competence of the Agency;
x To contribute in drafting of national plan of activities that defines the issues in the area of identification
documents and resources for data transfer in Bosnia and Herzegovina;
x To propose to the Ministry the launching of negotiations related to conclusion of international
agreements on cooperation in relation to the issues of development of identification documents and
scope of work of the Agency as provided for in Article of this Law;
x Pursuant to the Law on Administration, to submit the Annual Report
x To control the performance of the Agency;
x To carry out the necessary analyses of the rational deployment of employees and technical resources
of the Agency;
x To ensure cooperation with the Ministry, relevant organs of Bosnia and Herzegovina to act in
accordance with this Law, and other relevant authorities and institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina;
x To ensure implementation of international agreements and conventions in domain of identification
documents, which Bosnia and Herzegovina has ratified.
In addition to the duties and responsibilities Director performs other tasks, like:
x In accordance with the Law on Administration, Director proposes the Rulebook on Internal
Organisation to the Council of Ministers, as well as other regulations necessary to perform tasks under
the competence of the Agency;
x To delegate duties to Deputy Director and managers of organisational units of the Agency, pursuant to
the Law, Rulebook on Internal Organisation and other regulations;
x To make final decisions on recruitment, deployment and termination of employment of civil servants
and employees in the Agency, according to the laws of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
x To prepare and implement the program of specific trainings and education of the employees in the
Agency;
x Director is accountable for legitimate functioning of the Agency and for legitimate spending of budget
and other resources dedicated for the financing of the Agency;
x To perform other duties stipulated by the laws and other regulations.
'HSXW 'LUHFWRU
The Deputy Director is responsible to Managing Director of the Agency for her/his work.
The Deputy Director is the acting Director in the period of Managing Director’s absence, and performs the
duties entrusted to her/him by the Director. If the Director is impeded to perform his duties and responsibilities,
the Deputy Director shall perform it, until the Director is able to assume it or until the appointment of the new
Director.
Director and Deputy Director are appointed by the Council of Ministers, in accordance with the Law on
Ministerial Appointments (’’Official Gazette of BiH’’, No.: 37/03).
Director and Deputy Director are in charge for five years, with the possibility of a reappointment in the next
mandate.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
18
21. 19
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
descriptions of all other employees of the Agency.
The Rulebook on Internal Organisation and Systematisation of Agency will define locations, number and job
2WKHU VWDIIUROHV
22. ŽŒž›’¢ Š››Š—Ž–Ž—œ ™˜•’Œ’Žœ
The purpose of “CIPS” data security and protection is to prevent potential hazard for data, information and
processes in data processing. Generally, we can divide these risks into the following:
x Natural disasters;
x Technical problems;
x Abuse of power;
x Human factor;
In the personalization centre of Banja Luka are considered the following security issues:
x Security of non-personalized documents
x Security of document production/personalisation process
x Central Vault -Daily vault
x Daily vault -Production
x Production - Control
x Control – Packing
x Security in storing personalized documents
x Security of distribution of the documents from the Personalisation Centre to the citizens
5LVNV DQG PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHV 23. CIPS provides the following risk mitigation measures:
x Protection measures adopted by CIPS:
x Protection through introduced physical measures;
x Protection via software solutions;
x Data back-up;
x Protection via programmed controls;
x Protection via control of data access;
x Protection in recruitment process;
x Description of the activities in case of system crash;
x Development of data security and protection plan;
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
20
24. ˜–™Š›Š’ŸŽ ŠŠ ‹Ž ŽŽ— ˜œ—’Š Š—
Ž›£Ž˜Ÿ’—Š œ˜—’Š Š— Š•¢
The second part document is based on the examination of a series of studies implemented by different
organisations on the level of implementation of e-government and e-governance in Europe and in the World. In
particular it examined a Report carried out by the United Nations, “UN E-Government Survey 2008”, which
looks at the state of art of e-government and e-participation processes which have been implemented in 192
Countries.
The United Nations claim that even if some progresses have been made, there is still a lot to do. The United
Nation Report’s sub-title this year is “From e-Government to Connected Governance” to underline the need to
always think more about e-government in an articulated and integrated way which can both simplify the
relationships between the Institutions and the citizens and at the same time be a tool to guarantee a stronger
administrative efficacy and efficiency. The report also provides an overview on the most significant
experiences that exist at different national levels and also makes a classification of e-government and e-
participation in the world’s countries.
For what concerns HJRYHUQPHQW UHDGLQHVV UDQNLQJV, ltaly ranks 27th in a list where Sweden has overtaken
the United States and confirmed its supremacy among the Scandinavian countries with Denmark and Norway
ranking respectively second and third. Estonia ranks 13th and Bosnia is 94th. According to this report, the
progresses in the e-government sector have been very slow and only few governments have made the
necessary investments to shift from single e-government initiatives to a more integrated e-governance
strategy. In this year’s e-government readiness rankings, European countries account for 70 per cent of the
top 35 countries. Asian countries account for 20 per cent of the top 35 and countries in North America and
Oceania for 5 per cent. European countries as a group have invested heavily in deploying broadband
infrastructure, coupled with an increase in the implementation of e-government applications for their citizens.
Yet, according to the ITU, European countries account for nine of the top ten countries in broadband
subscribers per hundred citizens, with Denmark, the Netherlands and Iceland heading the chart.
5HJLRQDO $YHUDJH RI H*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV IURP WKH 8QLWHG 1DWLRQ 5HSRUW
The Figure above clearly shows the difference between the five regions, with Europe (0.6490) having an
obvious lead over the other regions, followed by the Americas (0.4936), Asia (0.4470), Oceania (0.4338) and
Africa (0.2739). Asia and Oceania are slightly below the world average (0.4514), while Africa lags far behind.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
21
25. The 5HJLRQDO H*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV 5DQNLQJV table pictured below shows a further breakdown by sub-
regions for Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe and Oceania. In the African region, there is a big gap between
the West African region and the Northern and Southern African regions. The Central and Eastern Africa
regions are close in rankings, with Eastern Africa ranking slightly higher. In the Americas, North America is
dominated by the United States, yet Canada is far ahead of the Caribbean, and of the Central and South
American regions. The regions of the Caribbean and of Central America are close to the world average, with
the South American region ranking slightly above.
5HJLRQDO (*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV 5DQNLQJV IURP WKH 8QLWHG 1DWLRQ 5HSRUW
In the Asian region, there is a major gap between Eastern Asia and the other regions. It should be noted that
the regions of Central and Southern Asia are far below the world average. In the European region, there is a
significant gap between Northern and Western Europe and Eastern and Southern Europe. Europe is the only
region that has all of its sub-regions above the world average.
In (*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV in Europe, The Czech Republic (0.6696) has taken the lead in the Eastern
European region, followed by Hungary (0.6494) and Poland (0.6134). The overall rankings in 2008 do not
differ too much from those in 2005. The notable exception is Ukraine, which moved up seven positions to
number 41.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
22
26. (*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV LQ (XURSH IURP WKH 8QLWHG 1DWLRQ 5HSRUW
(*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV IRU (DVWHUQ (XURSH
The Ministry of Finance of Poland http://www.mf.gov.pl/ provides citizens with information on its World Bank
Grant in an effort to strengthen its auditing functions and on its public debt. It also has a feature that allows
citizens to calculate its treasury bonds accrued interest over time. The Czech Republic’s national website
http://www.vlada.cz/ was rated the highest in this group. This site provides links to all of its advisory bodies
and working councils. The site also has Really Simple Syndication, which allows it to be frequently updated to
handle blogs and other feeds.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
23
27. (*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV IRU 1RUWKHUQ (XURSH
Over the past year, the United Kingdom has revamped its government online system, through an initiative to
pare down the numerous (hundreds) government websites available to the public. The UK’s main government
portal, http://www.directgov.uk/, was redesigned in 2008 and this appears to have resulted in a drop in the web
measure rankings for the UK. Yet, the Directgov.uk website (‘Public service all in one place’) does one of the
best jobs in bringing together information and services from the central government as well as from local
authorities. The main site is filled with information, and has a consolidated directory and services listing for the
central government with local authorities, as well as excellent additional linkages to local government services
and resources. Furthermore, the main site has new citizen communications features, such as a mobile
government portal and a separate business gateway http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/. While the UK national
site may have slipped in the rankings, the site thanks to its comprehensive information and services, covering
different levels of government, still provides good value to the citizen users. It should be noted that all
countries in Northern Europe are in the top 20 per cent of the infrastructure, education and web measurement
indices, as well as the e-government readiness index.
The Social Security and Labour Ministry of Lithuania http://www.socmin.lt/ provides an online English-
Lithuanian dictionary of social terms, employment and health topics. It also gives advice on how to find work,
with the option of consulting a government official via the Internet.
(*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV IRU 6RXWKHUQ (XURSH
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
24
28. Spain (0.7228) has improved tremendously since 2005 and has taken the lead in this region by moving up 19
positions to the 20th spot. Spain has improved immensely on the web measure index, as well as on the
infrastructure index. On the infrastructure side, the deployment of broadband increased the number of PCs per
100 inhabitants from 19 to 28 and Internet users per 100 inhabitants went from 24 to 43. On the web measure
side, it had a separate e-government portal that strongly encourages e-participation, provides online
transactions on a secure link, and communication via mobile phones with citizens, providing alerts. Spain has
also enhanced its national sites through better multimedia tools (video and audio clips). Spain’s Ministry of
Finance allows to sign-up via e-mail, to create online personal accounts on secure links, while the Ministry of
Education has established a one-stop shop. All these improvements increased Spain’s total web measure
index. Spain’s national website http://www.la-moncloa.es has a separate portal dedicated to e-government.
The website also has a strong business focus thanks to the ‘Spain Business’ section, which is aimed at
attracting foreign investment in Spain. The site appears in several languages including: Japanese, Chinese,
Russian, German, Portuguese and English. Spain was followed by Slovenia (0.6681) and Italy (0.6680). Malta
(0.6582), the leader in the 2005 survey of this region, is fourth in the 2008 Survey. The national website of
Slovenia http://e-uprava.gov.si/e-uprava/en/portal.euprava is to be commended for having a user-friendly one-
stop shop. It also has a section that allows visually impaired citizens to navigate through the website. The
Government of Slovenia is planning further enhancements to the portal to assist the blind and visually
impaired. An external visitor site http://www.slovenia.si/ also provides a wealth of information and resources
for visitors to Slovenia and for businesses that are potentially seeking opportunities in the emerging economy
of the nation. The system also includes a separate portal for Slovenia' participation in the European Union,
s
http://evropa.gov.si/ , ‘Slovenia, at Home in Europe’.
(*RYHUQPHQW 5HDGLQHVV IRU :HVWHUQ (XURSH
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
25
29. The Netherlands (0.8631), France (0.8038) and Luxembourg (0.7512) have made tremendous progress since
2005, moving up the e-government readiness survey to rank 5th, 9th and 14th respectively. Germany as result
of a lower web measure score dropped from 11th to 22nd this year. France’s national website www.premier-
ministre.gouv.fr scored the highest in the region. The site has a strong e-participation presence and has
features for online consultation, has a separate e-government portal and has instituted a time frame to
respond to citizen’s queries and e-mails. The site also contains a number of news feeds and RSS to
continuously update citizens with information from the media and blogs. Malta’s Health Ministry is an excellent
example of providing customer services online. The portal allows citizens to apply for the European Health
Insurance Card online. It has an electronic patient library that runs thanks to a partnership with a private firm,
which provides citizens with a medical encyclopaedia, information on surgeries and procedures, and has
animated lessons. The portal also provides its citizens with a list of local pharmacies.
http://www.ehealth.gov.mt/article.aspx?art=90. Aware of major policy proposals and priorities of the
government, The Netherlands’s national website http://www.overheid.nl provides its citizens with a robust
portal that contains all of its available information on the front page. One of the interesting features is the
history of the Netherlands, which offers an historic background of the country. Another interesting feature
which does not appear in other national sites is the feature on driver licences in the country. This section, on
the front page of the site, provides citizens and foreigners with a quick and simple way of obtaining information
on driver licences.
With regards to HSDUWLFLSDWLRQ, which is considered as the use of New Technologies that enable governments
to dialogue with their citizens, the report’s top five spots are taken by the United States, South Korea,
Denmark, France and Australia. Estonia ranks 8th, Italy ranks 56th and Bosnia 99th. The report highlights that
it examined only the use of New Technologies by Central Public Administrations to increase the participation in
public life, while it does not examine what happens in the e-democracy field at local level.
(3DUWLFLSDWLRQ ,QGH[ 7RS RXQWULHV
If we make a comparison with a similar report which was carried out in 2005, a general improvement by
Governments in the HGHPRFUDF sector can be noticed, even if, the researchers underline, the most
significant progresses have been made in the provision of information of public interest which are propaedeutic
to citizens’ participation in public life (HLQIRUPDWLRQ). Fewer progresses have been made in the provision of
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
26
30. listening and dialogue tools (HFRQVXOWDWLRQ), in terms of concrete effects of such processes on the government
actions (HGHFLVLRQ PDNLQJ).
1DWLRQDO 3URJUHVV 5HSRUW RQ H*RYHUQPHQW LQ WKH (8
The National Progress Report reveals impressive achievements in e-Government across the EU. A National
Progress Report on e-Government in the EU27+, was presented at the Ministerial e-Government Conference
on 19 September 2007 in Lisbon. This meeting was attended by 22 e-Government Ministers, who reviewed
progress made in the implementation of e-Government Services since the launch of the European
Commission’s i2010 initiative for Growth and Jobs (2005), the Manchester Ministerial Declaration (2005) and
the i2010 e-Government Action Plan agreed by the Council in June 2006. Most Member States policies and
implementation actions are now in place and aligned with the goals of the Action Plan. Services are becoming
more effective nationally and more interoperable at European level, delivering higher quality, saving billions of
euros through efficiency gains, and increasing the transparency and accountability of administrations.
The National Progress Report also registers impressive progress in transforming public administrations,
thereby boosting economic growth by placing citizens and businesses at the centre of government services.
Member States have developed and agreed roadmaps for mutual recognition and authentication of electronic
identities, for cross-border e-Procurement and for inclusive e-Government. Equally important is the effort to
reduce administrative burdens for both citizens and businesses, the increasing level of e-Participation activity,
and the willingness of public administrations to share good practices.
The achievements of Member States has been further confirmed by the independent survey The user
challenge: Benchmarking the supply of online public services undertaken for the Commission by Capgemini
and published in September 2007. While progress has been impressive, work needs to continue. Stock will be
taken again at the next Ministerial e-Government Conference in Stockholm in 2009, during the Swedish
Presidency.
(8 %HQFKPDUN 6XUYH RI
The EU Benchmark Survey of 2007 “Full report”: The user challenge - Benchmarking the supply of online
public services - 7th measurement confirms that Member States are making significant progress in e-
Government. Europe continues to make sound progress on the supply of on-line public services. The maturity
of online public services in the EU keeps improving. They have now reached an overall level of sophistication
that full two-way interaction between citizens and Governments is the norm. In fact they are moving rapidly
towards the stage where a whole process can be conducted on-line: 58% of services now allow the citizen to
receive a public service conducted fully on-line, 8% more than in 2006. This means better, more efficient and
effective public service provision for both citizens and businesses. For the first time, the survey assessed the
national portals and found that Governments have invested in delivering these as a high quality, convenient,
trusted and branded route for the provision of public services. The survey has also looked at the users
experience when accessing on-line public services, recognizing the growing importance of this topic.
Once again, Austria leads the online public service league with a nearly perfect score, followed by Malta,
Portugal and Slovenia. Businesses are still being better served than citizens, although the gap between the
two is closing. Since 2001, this survey has measured the share of public services fully available on line in the
EU, plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and for the first time this year, Turkey.
The different degrees of sophistication of online public services range from ‘basic’ information provision to ‘full’
electronic case handling (fully available online) and proactive, personalised service delivery. This proactive
stage was introduced this year for the first time as an indication of the emergence of intelligent service
delivery we are now seeing in the EU. Services for business still score well above those for citizens on both
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
27
31. counts. Sophistication for businesses lies at 84%, whereas for citizens it is at 70%. The difference is greater in
terms of full availability, with 70% of services for businesses fully available on line against 50% for citizens.
Austria, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Malta have achieved 100% fully-online availability for businesses.
However, in the past year the gap has reduced considerably, and services for citizens saw a marked growth
compared to previous surveys. In the UK, Finland, Norway and Slovenia citizens are now served just as well
as businesses. For the first time in this edition the survey examined three elements which are important to the
user experience: the provision of a legally recognised, secure electronic identity; whether the service could be
accessed via alternative channels such as call centres, kiosks, mobile phones and TV; and compliance of the
websites with the International Accessibility Guidelines. The overall result for this indicator is more mixed and
averages at 19%, with Austria, Bulgaria and Norway scoring above 30%. The most striking finding was that
only 5% of websites make a specific reference to their compliance with international accessibility guidelines
(WAI). National portals fared much better. The report looked at the number of basic public services which can
be accessed from the portal, the existence of customized options, ease of navigation and whether its
presentation is targeted at different kinds of users (businesses vs. citizens, focussing on events or the
structure of the administration). The overall score of 75% demonstrates that national governments consider
their national portal as one of the cornerstones of their e-Government plans.
With regards to Estonia, it scores well in the 2007 survey, with a level of fully-online availability of 70% and a
sophistication level of 87%. The poor result of online sophistication is due to a different appreciation of the fully
online availability of certain service providers. Estonia has dropped from 2nd overall position in 2006 to the
upper end of the 3rd quartile. The levels of sophistication for businesses as well as for citizens are above
EU27+ averages.
Six out of the nine relevant services achieved the pro-active sophistication level (= 67%; EU27+ average score
being 36%). With regards to user centricity, Estonia, with 29%, is above the EU27+ average of 19%.
The assessment of the National Portal (http://www.riik.ee/en/) shows a high score equal to 88% (compared to
the average of 75%). The majority of the public services (17 out of 24 relevant services) are accessible
through the portal.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
28
32. The Estonian health insurance system is based on the principle of solidarity. All medical costs incurred are
reimbursed by the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. Each patient pays a reduced personal contribution, which
is non-refundable. This system is only applicable for those health service providers that have a contract with
the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. Where a health service provider doesn’t have this kind of contract, a
patient must pay for the service himself. Citizens which have access internet banking or are in possession of
an eID card can use eServices through the national portal to check the validity of their health insurance, their
personal data, the name of the family physician and the payment of sickness benefits.
With regards to Italy, it has made sound progress: it scores a high overall sophistication equal to 79% and a
progression in fully-online availability equal to 70%, up from 58% - a substantial improvement to 11th position.
Pro-active sophistication scores above the EU27+ average, with four out of nine relevant services reaching the
fifth level of sophistication. Concerning user centricity, Italy scored 20%, just above the EU27+ average of
19%.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
29
33. The National Portal offers (http://www.italia.gov.it/) access to all of the 24 basic public services: navigation
possibilities could still be improved, however all information needed to find one’s way round the site is there.
The scoring in this survey for the National Portal is at 82% against an average for the EU27+ of 75%.
- The crime reporting service Denuncia vi@ Web (‘Report a crime vi@ the web’) enables the public to report
lost or stolen property online. The aim of the service is to simplify procedures for filing crime reports, making
reporting a crime possible at any given time and place.
- The National Portal provides a comprehensive starting point for searches related to the citizen’s services,
with different search modes such as life events and themes, with a shortcut to the online services.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
30
34. 1HZ H*RYHUQPHQW XVHU VDWLVIDFWLRQ DQG XVHU LPSDFW SURMHFW LQ WKH (XURSHDQ
8QLRQ
The Information Society and Media Directorate-General of the European Commission recently launched a new
study which will contribute to the EU policy agenda on e-Government measurement and on the Efficiency and
Effectiveness objectives. The project will develop a multilayer user satisfaction and impact measurement
toolkit for inclusive public eServices. Based on existing experiences and in close collaboration with the
European e-Government agencies, a measurement framework will be developed that will include a toolkit and
context-based methodology: creating the new standard for inclusive e-Government user measurement. The e-
Government Progress in the EU27+ report reveals that twelve countries, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, The Netherlands, and the UK have put in place
measures of user satisfaction. The approaches vary in scope and sophistication. The present EU study will
establish best practice and facilitate benchmarking across agencies, regions and countries. The measurement
toolkit will be piloted in different member states. Towards the end of 2008, the results of the pilot will be
discussed during an interactive workshop (on 14 November 2008). In the near future a discussion forum to
collect experiences and share ideas on user satisfaction assessment will be launched on the e-Practice portal.
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
31
35. ‘Ž Ž¡™Ž›’Ž—ŒŽ ’— Š•¢
Basic data and indicators
Data from Eurostat updated to June 2008
Population (1 000): 59 131.3 inhabitants (2007)
GDP at market prices: 1 535 540.4 million Euros (2007)
GDP per inhabitant in PPS (Purchasing Power Standards, EU-27 = 100): 101.4 (2007)
GDP growth rate: 1.5 % (2007)
Inflation rate: 2.0 % (2007)
Unemployment rate: 6.1 % (2007)
Government debt/GDP: 104.0 % (2007)
Public balance (government deficit or surplus/GDP): -1.9 % (2007)
Source: Europa Website
3ROLWLFDO 6WUXFWXUH
Italy has been a Parliamentary Republic since 2 June 1946 (following a referendum that abolished the
Monarchy). The legislative power is held by a bicameral Parliament made up of a Chamber of Deputies (630
elected members) and a Senate (315 elected members). The members of the two Chambers are elected for a
period of five years. The Head of State is the President of the Republic, who is elected by the Parliament (joint
session) and by 3 delegates from each of the 20 Italian regions for a seven-year term. Executive power is
exercised by the Government, consisting of the Prime Minister (referred to in Italy as the President of the
Council of Ministers) and the Ministers jointly constituting the Council of Ministers. The President appoints the
Prime Minister and, on his advice, the Ministers. The Government has to enjoy the confidence of both
chambers and is answerable to Parliament. The Prime Minister conducts and is responsible for the general
policy of the Government. Italy is made up of 20 regions, five of which are governed according to a special
autonomous statute; it includes 103 provinces and 8 101 municipalities. The regions have legislative power
together with the state in matters of concurrent legislation, except for fundamental principles that are reserved
to state law. The regions have exclusive legislative power with respect to any matters not expressly reserved
to state law. Municipalities and provinces have regulatory power with respect to the organisation and fulfilment
of the functions assigned to them. A constitutional reform promoted by the Government and adopted by
Parliament in October 2005 was intended to significantly extend the powers of the regions (devolution). Italians
rejected this reform via referendum on 25 and 26 June 2006. The Constitution of the Italian Republic was
adopted on 22 December 1947 and entered into force on 1 January 1948. Italy was one of the founding
members of the European Economic Community in 1957.
,QIRUPDWLRQ 6RFLHW ,QGLFDWRUV
x Percentage of households with Internet access: 43 % (2007)
x Percentage of enterprises with Internet access: 94 % (2007)
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
32
36. x Percentage of individuals using the Internet at least once a week: 34 % (2007)
x Percentage of households with a broadband connection: 25 % (2007)
x Percentage of enterprises with a broadband connection: 76 % (2007)
x Percentage of individuals that have purchased/ordered online in the last three months: 7% (2007)
x Percentage of enterprises having received orders online within the previous year: 2 % (2007)
x Percentage of individuals using the Internet for interacting with public authorities: obtaining information
15.2 %, downloading forms 10.6 %, returning filled forms 4.6 % (2007)
x Percentage of enterprises using the Internet for interacting with public authorities: obtaining
information 74 %, downloading forms 70 %, returning filled forms 35 % (2007)
6WDWH RI HJRYHUQPHQW LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ LQ ,WDO
Thanks to the advent of new technological tools which are better and faster when implementing the different
operations, a big change was registered in the modality of informing the citizens/users and to make them more
involved in Public Administration activities. This evolution takes the name of e-government and e-democracy.
(JRYHUQPHQW, as reported by the Italian Government document “Government Guidelines for the development
of the Information Society”, means that public administrations must fulfil some conditions if they wish to be
completely in line with new way of informing and communicating , such as:
x All the priority services have to be available on-line
x All the internal mail of a Public Administration must circulate via e-mail
x Computer literacy has to be ensured among all eligible public employees
x 2/3 of the Public Administration’s offices have to make available on-line access to the record
processing by citizens
x All the offices which provide services have to include a customer satisfaction system.
Following the i2010 strategy, the national “Action Plan for Information Society”, which includes, among other
sectors, the “E-government”, was launched in 2000.
The plan implementation featured a strong collaboration, which allowed in a first stage the on-line services
implementation - aimed both at citizens and enterprises - and then infrastructural services implementation. The
second stage of the Plan included the strengthening and the territorial extension of the experiences already
tested and some new initiatives for e-Democracy development.
Since January 2006 The Code of the Digital Administration (Codice dell’amministrazione digitale - CAD) has
been in force, laying down the rules on how to implement a more efficient Public Administration, with less
waste and fewer costs. CAD offers, to both enterprises and citizens, the right to interact always and
everywhere with the Administrations through the network and, at the same time, it obliges all the
Administrations to make all information available on-line.
At the beginning of 2007 the Minister for Innovation and Reforms in the Public Administration, Luigi Nicolais,
presented the e-government strategy guidelines, which can be summarised as follows:
x To improve the efficiency of the Public Administration;
x To implement interoperability and the full cooperation among administrations;
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
33
37. x To improve the transparency of public expenditure;
x To build-up the digital citizenship;
x To adopt a systemic approach for efficiency and quality
x To favour competitiveness among enterprises and the development of the ICT industry.
(GHPRFUDF
The project foresees a constant involvement of citizens in public decisions, in all possible sectors, for example
in political life, environment, planning department, transport. Many web sites of local public administrations
have opened forums to interact with citizens, involving people and the civil society in environmental and life
quality projects in the cities. These new communication models have improved the relationship between the
citizen-user without subordination but, on the contrary, through a relationship that favours integration and co-
operation, where the citizen becomes the main responsible of his/her future.
0*RYHUQPHQW
Mobile government is the new frontier of services provided by the Public Administration and uses as a
technological platform the infrastructure of mobile operators. Through these new services citizens can
implement a series of operations using, for example, their mobile phone to pay for parking, to be informed
about unemployment lists and about many other opportunities.
Among the different services available through mobile phones there are:
x Access to clinical records
x Communication about late arrivals of public services
x Payments of public parking places and of services for the elderly and disabled
x Road map services on GPRS.
7KH 0LQLVWU IRU 3XEOLF $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ DQG ,QQRYDWLRQ
The Ministry for Public Administration and Innovation has two Departments:
1. Public Administration Department
2. Innovation and Technologies Department
The Innovation and Technologies Department is the structure used by the Minister for the Public
Administration and Innovation to design and implement development policies of the Information Society, and
also for the interrelated technological innovations for Public Administrations, citizens and enterprises.
Its activities are:
3XEOLF $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ PRGHUQLVDWLRQ
* e-Government – improvement of the P.A. efficiency
* e-Government – high impact initiatives
,QQRYDWLRQ LQ SULRULW DUHDV
* e-Platform for tourism
¨¦B¨A) ¥ ! 9 @%$¤9 ¨ 86 ©¨ ! 5 !¤¨¦4¨1) 12 1) # ¥ ¤'¤%¨¤# ¨¥ ! ¦¨¥ ¥ ¨¦¤¢
£ $ © 6 $ ¥ 7 7 ¡ ©§ £ $¥ 3 0 (§¥ ¡ $§ © § ©§¥ £¡
34
38. * ICT and digital contents for schools
* ICT @ University
* National Platform for Health (eHealth)
* Initiatives for infomobility
* Technological innovation promotion
,QQRYDWLRQ RI WKH SURGXFWLYH VVWHP
* Actions to facilitate innovative processes and products (SMEs)
* Regional Plans to strengthen the competitiveness of the local industry
'LJLWDO 'LYLGH 5HGXFWLRQ
* ICT use dissemination
*to improve access to education and training
H*RYHUQPHQW DQG ,7 IRU WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI
* planning activities and technical cooperation
* promotional activities of international partnerships
* support activities to governance policies of Information Society
1,3$ 3UHVHQWDWLRQ
CNIPA (Centro Nazionale per l’Informatica nella Pubblica Amministrazione – National Centre for ICT in the
Public Administrations) works at the Council Presidency for the implementation of policies of the Ministry of
Reform and Innovation in Public Administrations. It was created thanks to the unification of two pre-existing
bodies: the Autorità per l’informatica nella pubblica amministrazione (the Authority for ICT in public
administration) and the Centro Tecnico per la R.U.P.A. (Technical Centre for the Single Network of Public
Administrations). CNIPA was created with the objective of providing support to public administrations for the
efficient use of ICT, so they can improve the quality of services and keep a lid on expenditures.
CNIPA is headed by a collective body composed of a President and three other components that are
appointed by Italy’s Prime Minister.
… ¨¦B¨A“ € † !„ e @%¤e ƒ¨„ d˜ ‚¨‡ ! †— !¤¨¦4¨1“ 1• 1“ ‰ € ¤'¤%¨¤‰ ¨€ † !„ ‡ ¦¨€ „ € ¨¦¤¢w
ƒ †„y „ ƒ ‚ † ƒ ˜ € ™ ™ x ‚„„ y € – ” ’€ ‘x „ ˆ„ ƒ ‚ † ƒ„ … ƒ ƒ ‚€ yx
35
39. 1,3$ $FWLYLWLHV
CNIPA:
x contributes to defining the Government and Ministry’s policies for reform and innovation for public
administration and provides consultancies for the assessment of law proposals in the ICT sector;
x coordinates the planning process and the main development interventions; it sets standards and criteria
for the planning, implementation and management of ICT systems of administrations, of their quality and
of related organizational aspects; defines criteria and technical rules for safety, inter-operability and
performance;
x ensures that targets and results of innovation projects in the public administration are coherent with the
Government’s strategy; for this purpose it provides secondment to public administrations in the planning
phase and it issues technical-economic suitability assessment;
x it takes care of the enforcement of important projects for technical innovation in the public
administration, of diffusing e-government and of the development of major infrastructure networks in the
country to allow public offices to communicate with one another and to provide citizens and companies
with the public administrations’ services;
x it takes care of the training of state employees in the ICT sector, using new technologies to favour
continuous learning.
In the past the centre has worked on:
x creating software for the mentally and physically impaired;
x collecting best practices in ICT;
x working on the introduction of electronic signatures in Public Administrations;
x listing all open formats accessible to Public Administrations;
x providing ICT training to Public Administrations;
… ¨¦B¨A“ € † !„ e @%¤e ƒ¨„ d˜ ‚¨‡ ! †— !¤¨¦4¨1“ 1• 1“ ‰ € ¤'¤%¨¤‰ ¨€ † !„ ‡ ¦¨€ „ € ¨¦¤¢w
ƒ †„y „ ƒ ‚ † ƒ ˜ € ™ ™ x ‚„„ y € – ” ’€ ‘x „ ˆ„ ƒ ‚ † ƒ„ … ƒ ƒ ‚€ yx
36