Royal society of chemistry activities to develop a data repository for chemistry specific data final
•Descargar como PPT, PDF•
2 recomendaciones•649 vistas
The Royal Society of Chemistry publishes many thousands of articles per year, the majority of these containing rich chemistry data that, in general, in limited in its value when isolated only to the HTML or PDF form of the articles commonly consumed by readers. RSC also has an archive of over 300,000 articles containing rich chemistry data especially in the form of chemicals, reactions, property data and analytical spectra. RSC is developing a platform integrating these various forms of chemistry data. The data will be aggregated both during the manuscript deposition process as well as the result of text-mining and extraction of data from across the RSC archive. This presentation will report on the development of the platform including our success in extracting compounds, reactions and spectral data from articles. We will also discuss our developing process for handling data at manuscript deposition and the integration and support of eLab Notebooks (ELNS) in terms of facilitating data deposition and sourcing data. Each of these processes is intended to ensure long-term access to research data with the intention of facilitating improved discovery.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (19)
Destacado
Destacado (7)
Similar a Royal society of chemistry activities to develop a data repository for chemistry specific data final
Similar a Royal society of chemistry activities to develop a data repository for chemistry specific data final (20)
Más de Ken Karapetyan
Más de Ken Karapetyan (10)
Último
Último (20)
Royal society of chemistry activities to develop a data repository for chemistry specific data final
- 1. Royal Society of Chemistry activities to develop a data repository for chemistry-specific data Aileen Day, Alexey Pshenichnov, Ken Karapetyan, Colin Batchelor, Peter Corbett, Jon Steele, Valery Tkachenko and Antony Williams, ACS Dallas March 2014
- 2. Data in a Scientific Publication • This is not new, you known the story… • So much data of value contained within a publication and delivered in a PDF form • PDF files, and especially unclear licensing, don’t allow me at the data so I can rework, reuse, repurpose, text mine etc. • I specialize in XXXX. I want a database of YYYY extracted from publications and made available, for free, with capabilities I need, and the publishers should just do it
- 5. And over the years, progress… • There is much progress with open access, data access, licensing, enhanced articles, open data, free online tools, open source codes, publishers waking up, scientists contributing • We should be excited at what is available now, what the future holds, what opportunities exist in front of us
- 6. But it’s NOT easy..technology
- 7. But it’s not easy…US • Not everything we would like around data handling is there for sure • Many systems, tools, platforms are already available but we don’t know about them or even if we did contributing us “more work” • “What’s in it for me?”, “It’s my data”, “It’s too much work”, “What credit do I get?”
- 8. An Initial “Vague” Vision Set • Manage “all” of the chemistry data associated with chemical substances • Data to be downloadable, reusable, interactive • Build a platform that enables the scientist • Data storage, validation, standardization and curation • Collaborative data sharing • Provide data platform that can enable and enhance publishing of scientific papers
- 9. Data Repository • Registration of chemical compounds • Deposition of chemical syntheses • Addition of analytical data • Integration to electronic notebooks • Rewards and recognition for data sharing • Document processing • Hosting of data as private, embargoed or public
- 11. I hate text mining data • DERA: Developing pipelining tools for text- mining so we will be able to process documents for mark-up • Compound extraction/markup • Reaction extraction/conversion • Convert “text spectra” to generate spectral libraries… AGGHHHHH!
- 12. “Where is the real data please?” FIGURE DATA
- 13. Data Preferences - total bias • Views of a spectroscopist • Give me the data – interactive, downloadable spectrum is way more valuable to me (processed spectrum and FID available) • Spectral header in JCAMP standard is very incomplete (and most spectral standards) • I want ASSIGNED/ANNOTATED spectra if possible – don’t “textify” a spectrum!
- 14. Solving the problem here.. • Binary file formats are problematic – think of the variations in instrumentation and software • Standards can be defined – are they correctly implemented? CIF and its Checking, Spectral standards - JCAMP versions, Structure formats, etc… • Metadata is crucial
- 15. …and what does it solve? • “Fixing the data” – data can’t be faked as easily • Reprocessing of analytical data can be done…weighting functions, baseline correction, deconvolution etc. • I can convert and store it locally
- 16. But solve it for many things • I want molecules as structure formats not images • Please don’t make us hack tables of data • Tell us how you generated your files – software version, software libraries, etc.
- 17. Input data pipeline Deposition Gateway Staging databases Compounds Reactions Spectra Materials Articles / CSSP Compounds Module Spectra Module Reactions Module Materials Module Textmining Module ͙ Module Web UI for unified depositions DropBox, Google Drive, SkyDrive, etc LabTroveand other templated data Documents API, FTP, etc Raw data Validated data Staging databases Alldatabases are sliced by data sources/data collections and havesimple security model where each data slice/sourceis private, public or embargoed
- 27. Input data pipeline Deposition Gateway Staging databases Compounds Reactions Spectra Materials Articles / CSSP Compounds Module Spectra Module Reactions Module Materials Module Textmining Module ͙ Module Web UI for unified depositions DropBox, Google Drive, SkyDrive, etc LabTroveand other templated data Documents API, FTP, etc Raw data Validated data Staging databases Alldatabases are sliced by data sources/data collections and havesimple security model where each data slice/sourceis private, public or embargoed
- 29. User Interface Approach Compounds Reactions Spectra Materials Documents Compounds API Reactions API Spectra API Materials API Documents API Compounds Widgets Reactions Widgets Spectra Widgets Materials Widgets Documents Widgets Data tier Data access tier User interface components tier Analytical Laboratory application User interface tier (examples) Electronic Laboratory Notebook Paid 3rd party integrations (various platforms – SharePoint, Google, etc) Chemical Inventory application
- 33. User Interface Approach Compounds Reactions Spectra Materials Documents Compounds API Reactions API Spectra API Materials API Documents API Compounds Widgets Reactions Widgets Spectra Widgets Materials Widgets Documents Widgets Data tier Data access tier User interface components tier Analytical Laboratory application User interface tier (examples) Electronic Laboratory Notebook Paid 3rd party integrations (various platforms – SharePoint, Google, etc) Chemical Inventory application
- 35. User Interface Approach Compounds Reactions Spectra Materials Documents Compounds API Reactions API Spectra API Materials API Documents API Compounds Widgets Reactions Widgets Spectra Widgets Materials Widgets Documents Widgets Data tier Data access tier User interface components tier Analytical Laboratory application User interface tier (examples) Electronic Laboratory Notebook Paid 3rd party integrations (various platforms – SharePoint, Google, etc) Chemical Inventory application
- 38. User Interface Approach Compounds Reactions Spectra Materials Documents Compounds API Reactions API Spectra API Materials API Documents API Compounds Widgets Reactions Widgets Spectra Widgets Materials Widgets Documents Widgets Data tier Data access tier User interface components tier Analytical Laboratory application User interface tier (examples) Electronic Laboratory Notebook Paid 3rd party integrations (various platforms – SharePoint, Google, etc) Chemical Inventory application
- 39. Analytical Chemist Characterize Measure Search Store <<include>> <<include>> <<include>> Synthetic Chemist Search (synthetic procedure) Document (publish synthetic procedure) Retrosynthetic analysis
- 40. Medicinal Chemist Search (against database of properties) Source (find vendor) Analyse (cluster, dock, screen) Computational Chemist Search or Develop algorithm Store results Run calculations Synthesize Measure activity
- 41. Addition of Analytical Data • Spectral Container is in development using componentized widgets for display • NIST spectra converted into standardized JCAMP format for deposition - 296,103 spectra deposited • 10% of remaining NIST spectra need to be curated as there are obvious structure issues
- 42. Electronic Notebook Data • Development work integrating chemistry into the Southampton Labtrove notebook • Stoichiometry table development • Analytical data integration • “ChemTrove” rolled out to a small test group in January
- 46. Present activities – ACS Fall • Deposition process development of compounds, reactions and spectral data by Spring • FTP, DropBox, Web-upload, ELN integration • Compounds, Reactions, Spectral data search, display, download • Data sharing – private, public, collaborative • Metadata, metadata, metadata standards! • Open Sourcing CRD and CVSP
- 47. Acknowledgments • Jeremy Frey and Simon Coles, University of Southampton • Will Dichtel and Leah McEwan, Cornell University • Stuart Chalk, University of North Florida • Bob Hanson and Bob Lancashire, Jmol and JSpecView
- 48. Thank you Email: williamsa@rsc.org ORCID: 0000-0002-2668-4821 Twitter: @ChemConnector Personal Blog: www.chemconnector.com SLIDES: www.slideshare.net/AntonyWilliams