Article appeared on Kashmirwatch.com on August 2, 2010.
http://www.kashmirwatch.com/showexclusives.php?subaction=showfull&id=1278360628&archive&start_from&ucat=15&var1news=value1news
1. Welcome To KashmirWatch.Com - In-depth Coverage on Kashmir Conflict Monday, August 02, 2010
Navigation Exclusives
.: Home
.: About Us
.: Contact Us
.: Advertise
Ads by Google :. Kashmir Held to Ransom
Kashmir Jammu
Pakistan Kashmir
Kashmir India
Indian Navy
Kashmir Watch, July 5
Watch India
Nyla Ali Khan
News & Views
.: KW Exclusive Holding people to ransom; criminalizing political space; causing psychosomatic ills;
.: Daily News forcing people to develop apathetic attitudes toward the demands of life by
.: Kashmir Global immobilizing them; disabling the younger generation from finding healthy ways to
.: Articles channelize their energy; curbing the vitality of Srinagar by reducing it to a garrison in
.: World Watch
which movement is violently restricted by ugly coils of razor wire; appalling traffic in
.: Biz Watch
.: KW Study volatile areas which remains uncontrolled by slumberous policemen; life revolving
.: AJ&K around the diktats issued by gun-toting men; fleeing tourists with anxiety writ large on
.: Pakistan their faces; lay people being made to dance to the tunes of a martyrdom seeking
.: India
.: Letters
octogenarian; a fledgling government that finds it difficult to wade through the murky
.: Photos waters of coalition politics; the culpability of mainstream politicians and separatists
.: Charity who all live with the indulgence of proverbial lotus-eaters.
.: Sports
Gloom is writ large on the faces of young professionals, students, and lay people. A
Ads by Google lack of purposefulness; a paralyzing atmosphere of fear and paranoia; a suffering
India Photos populace whose voice is stifled by those who claim to be ideologically motivated and
India Time
fighting for a “just” cause; the complicity of state-sponsored agencies with
Government News
Kashmir Watch self-proclaimed guardians of religious freedom; the ineptitude of the coalition
India History government which decides its next move according to Syed Ali Shah Geelani's sudden
and unaccountable change of mood; the passionate nature of violence in conflict-ridden
Focus
Kashmir where politicians need a couple of mercenaries at their beck and call to execute
.: Kashmir their lop-sided decrees, while turning a deaf ear to popular consent; the debasement of
.: Human Rights Watch the languages of both nationalism and political Islam; the trammeling of Kashmir by a www.KeralaTourism.org/DreamSeason
.: Interviews
.: Conferences
militarized culture; the benightedness of the territory by reprehensible misgovernance. Ads by Google
.: Tributes We, as a people, have been mourning the loss of lives, erosion of democratic institutions
.: Society & Culture and aspirations, destruction of our socio-cultural fabric, deliberate marginalization of
our people, all of which have occurred over the past two decades with an unparalleled
intensity. In the Afterword to my book, Islam, Women, and the Violence in Kashmir,
Select Language political psychologist Ashis Nandy correctly observes, “Everyone [in Kashmir] is
English bereaved and everyone is a mourner. The casualties include not merely the official and
unofficial dead and the incapacitated, but also those who have disappeared without a
trace. . . . There is in Kashmir a miasma of depression that touches everyone except the
Ads by Google ubiquitous tourist determined to consume Kashmir's unearthly beauty.” Torture
Kashmir Mix
India Government
machines have certainly accomplished the task of creating indelible scars, fears, panic,
Greater Kashmir which will not fade with the passage of time. But will this trauma leave us incapacitated
Gujarat Pakistan to envision a viable political and socioeconomic future for ourselves that would enable
Kashmir Post
Kashmir to become integrated into South Asia as a democratic state? If Kashmir were
simply a “political problem” as some mainstream politicians have been reiterating for a
while now, the elected civilian government would have no role to play. It is quite
possible that the coalition government doesn't envision a role for itself in the Kashmir
imbroglio. Aren't there more complex aspects to this problem for which the electorate
has voted its representatives into office, expecting them to voice people's hopes in the
hallowed halls of their overlords in New Delhi?
2. The Kashmir conflict is driven by nationalistic and religious fervor, each side
pointing to the violence and injustice of the other, each side pointing to its own
suffering and sorrow. The distrust, paranoia, and neurosis permeating the relationship
between a large number of people of Indian administered J & K and the Indian Union
has intensified the conflict. The guerilla war in the state has gone through a series of
phases since 1990 but repressive military and political force remains the brutal reality in
the State, which cannot be superseded by seemingly abstract democratic aspirations.
This conscious policy of the Indian State to erode autonomy, populist measures, and
democratic institutions in Indian administered J & K has further alienated the people of
the State from the Indian Union. The systemic erosion of political opposition in J & K
has delegitimized the voice of dissent and radicalized antagonism toward state-
sponsored institutions and organizations. The exposure of Indian democracy as a brutal
fa�ade has instigated unmitigated disgruntlement and antipathy toward Indian
democratic procedures and institutions in the State.
Although the insurgency in J & K, which has extracted an enormous price from the
people of the state, was generated by the systemic erosion of democratic and human
rights, socioeconomic marginalization, relegation of the people's democratic aspirations
to the background, we cannot indulge in lamentation for eternity. While the rebellion
may have been incited by India's political, social, and economic tactlessness, it has been
sustained by not just by the belligerence of the Indian army or by the garb of militant
Islam donned by some separatists, but by the territorial ambitions of Pakistan and the
inability of an elected government to function to its full potential in J & K. During the
ongoing insurgency, the Indian military has been granted a carte blanche without an iota
of accountability. Paramilitary forces in J & K, as witnessed over the past couple of
weeks, are a loose cannon, which even those in positions of political power can question
only to their detriment. Paramilitary forces in the state exercise their power with an
impassioned fury, a vindictive hatred, the brutality of an occupation force, at odds with
the dispassionate nature of modern warfare.
New Delhi's strategy in J & K was validated by US military operations in
Afghanistan, and the deployment of US forces in and around Pakistan to restrain
Pakistani aggression. India was assured by the US that it would stall any attempt by
Pakistan to extend the Kashmir dispute beyond local borders, which might disrupt its
operations against the Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Also, deployment of the US military in
Pakistani air bases strengthened New Delhi's confidence that Islamabad would hesitate
to initiate nuclear weapons use. Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has given its military the
prowess it
requires to exploit the disgruntlement of the Muslim population of the Kashmir Valley.
Pakistan's military leaders are privately convinced that its daunting nuclear arsenal has
dissuaded India from embarking upon a large-scale war. India's cautious stance is
however dictated by multiple factors. Its primary concern is that a limited war will not
enable it to accomplish substantive political or military objectives; that such a war
might spin out of control and would be impossible to cease according
to the wishes of the administration and the military; that India might find itself in
disfavour with and spurned by the international community, and that a war might beef
up nuclear armament. The impending menace of precipitative nuclearization has been
one of the many factors underlining the necessity to maintain a quasi-stable regime in
the South Asian region. In effect, one of the ramifications of India and Pakistan
climbing the ladder of nuclear proliferation has been a tottering stability,
maintained amidst the continuing conflict in Kashmir. The insurgency in Kashmir, India
and Pakistan's ideological differences and their political intransigence has resulted in the
eruption of a crisis.
Ironically, mainstream politicians and separatists in J & K haven't found niches in
the upper echelons of decision-making bodies, political, religious, or social. New Delhi
is letting them flail their arms and flex their muscles within carefully contained spaces,
but, for all intents and purposes, they have no place within India and Pakistan's bilateral
talks. The significant process of nation building and the construction of Kashmiri
nationalism isn't being facilitated by either party. Kashmiri society needs to recognize
the terror caused by such predatory discourses that swoop down on the vulnerable,
devouring their ideological and experiential strengths. How long will those unfamiliar
with the rich history and nuanced culture of Kashmir seek to describe the state of mind
of traumatized Kashmiris? How long will those ignorant of the rich heritage of Kashmir
seek to write narratives about the political future of Kashmir? A reconstruction of the
political space in Kashmir is the need of the day.
Despite the political mobilization of Kashmiris during the upheaval in 1931 and the