The document summarizes the outcomes of several Miller planning grants aimed at establishing an integrative leadership network for sustainable development. It discusses the development of a public leadership framework incorporating sustainability leadership tools and competencies. It also proposes leveraging the grant outcomes through online degree programs, leadership convenings, and a virtual research network coordinated by the Hatfield School of Government to further theory and practice in sustainable development policy.
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Integrative Leadership and Governance for Sustainable Development
1. ISS Miller Planning Grant Workshop Presentation: "Establishing an Integrative Leadership and Governance Research and Practice Network for Sustainable Development -- Outcomes and Leveraging Opportunities” Prof. Douglas Morgan, Principal Investigator Prof. Marcus Ingle, Co-PI December 2, 2010
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. Place-based Relationships Proposition: Public leadership is relational, requiring leaders to take into account the global consequences of acting within a place-bound institutional context. Visionary Proposition: Public leadership requires the creation of visions that successfully link past, present and future realities and transforms them into possibilities. Multidisciplinary Competence & Continuous Learning Proposition: Public leadership requires the competence to use and integrate multiple disciplines in a continuous learning process. Public Good Proposition: Pubic leadership requires selfless service for the sake of a larger public good. Continuous & Recursive Balancing Proposition: Public leadership requires continuous balancing of conflicting values in the midst of complex changing realities. Public Leadership: Working Framework Public Leadership Propositions: Executive Leadership Institute, Portland State University, 2009 Photo Illustration : Jennifer McFarland and Kristen Magis Political Decision-makers
7. The Public Leadership Framework and Corresponding Leadership Tools – Before Miller Public Leadership Framework Features Corresponding Leadership Tools for Educators and Practitioners 1. Context: Understanding of Place 1.1 Environmental Scanning 1.2 SWOT Analysis 1.3 Asset Mapping 2. Vision: Inspiring Others to Follow 2.1 Future Visioning 2.2 Policy Impacts Analysis 2.3 Policy Logical Frameworks 3. Competence: Knowing and Building Capacity 3.1 Leading One’s-self, Teams, Organizations and Societies 3.2 Empowering Followers 4. Integrity: Serving the Public Good 4.1 Public Values Assessment 4.2 Emotional Intelligence 5. Alignment: Balancing the Policy Interests 5.1 Stakeholder Analysis 5.2 Policy Convening Teams 5.3 Policy Monitoring and Evaluation
8.
9. The Public Leadership Framework and Corresponding Leadership Tools – Post Miller Public Leadership Framework Features “ Leadership for Sustainable Development” Tools for Educators and Practitioners 1. Context: Understanding of Place 1.1 Leadership Role Profile Tool 1.2 Contextual Intelligence and Foresight Tool 2. Vision: Inspiring Others to Follow 2.1 Leadership Problem and Opportunity Tool 2.2 Vision and Values Inspiration and Norming Tool 3. Competence: Knowing and Building Capacity 3.1 Developing Learning Sensibilities Tool 3.2 Diagnosing Wicked Challenges Tool 4. Integrity: Serving the Public Good 4.1 Leading with History in Mind Tool 4.2 Smart Power Tool 5. Alignment: Balancing the Values and Interests 5.1 Convening Coalitions Tool 5.2 Strategic Navigation Tool
Rationale for Emerge Sustainable development presents public sector officials with increasingly complex and wicked political and policy issues. Public officials, both politicians and public servants, need a leadership framework construct solutions for wicked issues. The EMERGE framework mirrors the complex and uncertain nature of wicked problems with its embodiment of a “dynamic systems approach” to leadership as recursive emergence is firmly grounded in the unique public sector characteristics of the USA and Oregon has a strong “theory to practice” orientation which relies heavily on PSU’s “co-production leadership development” approach