![Отказ от ответственности ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Destacado
Similar a Как выбрать оптимальную серверную архитектуру для создания высокоэффективных ЦОД
Similar a Как выбрать оптимальную серверную архитектуру для создания высокоэффективных ЦОД (20)
Más de Nick Turunov
Más de Nick Turunov (20)
Último
Último (20)
Как выбрать оптимальную серверную архитектуру для создания высокоэффективных ЦОД
- 1. Как выбрать оптимальную серверную архитектуру для создания высокоэффективных ЦОД Дмитрий Грязнов Директор по развитию корпоративных проектов в Украине Intel Corporation
- 3. Что дает бизнесу обновление ИТ-инфраструктуры?
- 4. ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛЬНЫЙ ПРОЦЕССОР. НОВАЯ ЭРА ВЫЧИСЛЕНИЙ .
- 5. Типовой ИТ-бюджет Source: Gartner IT Key Metrics Data 2008. 13% Инновации и новые возможности 20% Раскрытие возможностей установленного оборудования и ПО 67% Текущая эксплуатация Большинство компаний тратит слишком много на поддержку и слишком мало на инновации А как будет потрачен ваш ИТ-бюджет ?
- 6. « Регулярные инвестиции в новую инфраструктуру , такие как обновление серверов , критически важны . В службе Intel IT, мы установили, что постоянное улучшение существующей у нас инфраструктуры действительно сокращает суммы, необходимые для поддержки наших систем и поэтому является для нас высокоприоритетной инвестицией . » — Diane Bryant, CIO, Intel Corporation
- 7. Типовой цикл обновления – 3-4 года “ Разработайте программу регулярных изменений для перехода на более энергоэффективное оборудование — в среднем с интервалом в три-пять лет — для управления растущими затратами [ энергии ].” — Gartner, Ноябрь 2007 2 “ Детальный анализ возврата инвестиций (ROI) показал, что мы можем сократить затраты, обновляя все сервера старше четырех лет . Ранее мы использовали сервера значительно дольше с целью максимизации полезной отдачи от них .” — Intel IT Whitepaper, Июнь 2008 1 1 Source: Intel IT Server Refresh whitepaper, June 2008 http://communities.intel.com/docs/DOC-1693 2 Source: Data Center Conference: Day 4 Highlights the ‘Greening’ of Data Centers, by John R. Phelps and Mike Chuba, November 30, 2007, Gartner, Inc., ID Number: G00153658.
- 8. Преимущества обновления серверов ( одноядерные ЦПУ) Source: Intel estimates as of Nov 2008. Performance comparison using SPECjbb2005 bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. 2005 184 Intel ® Xeon ® Single Core Servers 2009 Цель: производительность 1:1 9x рост производительности 184 Intel ® Xeon ® 5500 Based Servers 18% сокращение расходов на электроэнергию в год или Цель: эффективность 9:1 21 Intel ® Xeon ® 5500 Based Servers Окупается за 8 Месяцев 90% сокращение расходов на электроэнергию в год
- 9. Преимущества обновления серверов ( двухъядерные ЦПУ) 2009 21 Servers 2006 63 Servers 1 Source: Intel internal measurements as of Feb 2009. Performance comparison using SPECjbb2005 bops (business operations per second). Use this slide in conjunction with backup data. 3:1 3:1 5100 Series 5500 Series Intel ® Xeon ® 5500 может снизить затраты на расширение дата-центра, , сократить занимаемое место и другие издержки Требуемое место 66% СОКРАЩЕНИЕ Оценка затрат на энергию 74% СОКРАЩЕНИЕ Оценка за год ЭКОНОМИЯ $61K Энергия + Лицензии ОС
- 10. Представляем новое семейство ЦПУ Intel ® Xeon ® 5500 и Intel ® Xeon ® 7 500 На базе микроархитектуры Intel ® нового поколения Новое поколение интеллектуальных серверов
- 14. Производительность процессоров Intel® Xeon™ класса 2 S Single Core Multi-core Relative Performance Intel ® Xeon ® 5100 Intel ® Xeon ® 5300 Intel ® Xeon ® 5400 Intel ® Xeon ® 5500 Performance gains represent a blend (GEO mean) of five common 2-socket workload types across a range of typical usages (see details) Dual Core Source: Published/submitted/measured results March 30, 2009. Each bar represents the geo mean of published results on five industry standard benchmarks – SPECint_rate, SPECfp_rate, SPECjbb2005, TPC-C and SAP-SD. Relative Performance Higher is better Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
- 15. Производительность серверов Xeon 5500 в сравнении с Xeon 5400 ERP Floating point Database Web Database Virtualization Server Side Java Java Apps Energy Efficiency Integer App Server Xeon 5400 series Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Source: Published/submitted/approved results March 30, 2009. See backup for additional details Relative Performance Higher is better Закрепляет лидерство в серверных тестах
- 17. Intel ® Xeon ® Processor 7500 Series An Intelligent Choice Energy Efficient Refresh Use up to 20:1 server replacement and achieve an estimated < 1 year payback with up to 90% lower operating costs † Performance Refresh Use 1:1 server replacement to deliver over 20x performance gains within an existing data center design † Intel Xeon Processor 7500 Series † Comparisons with single core Intel Xeon based on pre-production measurements of Intel Xeon 7500 compared to single core Xeon from 2005. For notes and disclaimers, see performance and legal information slides at end of this presentation. The Right Investment – Right Now Data Demanding Enterprise, Virtualization or HPC
- 18. Expanding Platform Capabilities CPU Sockets Max Memory Slots Max I/O Lanes Max Memory Capacity Xeon ® 7400 Xeon ® 7500 * Higher scaling accomplished through use of 3 rd party OEM chipsets. Platform capabilities of node controller systems vary by OEM Xeon ® 7500’s design modularity brings new meaning to "Expandable Platform" 4S >4* 32 OEM dependent 256GB OEM dependent 28 (Gen1) OEM dependent 2 4 8 >8* 32 64 128 OEM dependent 512GB 1TB 2TB OEM dependent 72 (gen2) 72 (gen2) 288 (gen2) OEM dependent
- 19. Intel “Glueless” & 3 rd Party Node Controller Platforms (examples) Intel “Glueless” (use only Intel chips) Node Controller (use 3 rd Party OEM node controller chips) 4 Socket Intel “glueless” platforms scale up to 8 sockets Higher socket scaling avail via 3 rd Party Node Controllers Node controller configurations are OEM specific 2-socket nodes 4-socket nodes EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX Node Controller Node Controller OEM specific design Node Controller Node Controller EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX OEM specific design EX EX EX EX EX EX EX EX 8 Socket
- 20. Intel ® Xeon ® Processor NEW 6500 Series ^ Sockets supported with Intel platforms only. Higher socket support available via use of 3 rd party OEM node controller * The higher NHM-EX memory capacity can be used to populate for highest capacity/performance or enable use of lower cost lower-density DIMMS. 128 DIMM slots supported on 8 socket systems; 4 sockets systems support 64 DIMMs. New Xeon ® 6500 (2 Socket EX) More processing threads, cache, memory capacity & RAS than Xeon ® 5000 Ideal for highly threaded, big memory databases & virtualization workloads Xeon ® 5500 Xeon ® 5600 Xeon ® 6500 Xeon ® 7500 uArchitecture Nehalem Westmere Nehalem Nehalem Platform Xeon 5500 series Xeon 5500 series Xeon 7500 series Xeon 7500 series Max Sockets Supported 2 2 2^ 8^ Cores/Threads (per socket) 4/8 6/12 8/16 8/16 Cache (level 3) 8 12 18 24 Memory DIMM Slots* 18 18 32 128* RAS Basic Basic Advanced Advanced Target Usage High perf 2S High perf 2S Premium 2S 4S & higher
- 21. Nehalem-based Server Performance The Greatest Intel® Xeon® Performance Leap In History! Expecting larger gains from Nehalem Architecture in MP 1 Based on May’09 internal measurement using Intel internal workload 2 Based on Sept’09 internal measurement using OLTP workload. NHM-EX vs Dunnington-Caneland. Xeon ® 5500 vs. Xeon ® 5400 Up to 3.5x Memory Bandwidth Up to 2.5x Database Performance Up to 1.7x Integer Throughput Up to 2.2x Floating Point Throughput Nehalem-EX vs. Xeon ® 7400 Up to 9x Memory Bandwidth 1 Up to 3.0x Database Performance 2 > 1.7x Integer Throughput > 2.2x Floating Point Throughput
- 23. Линейка процессоров Intel® Xeon™ 5500 † Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz). Дополнительные возможности – в старших моделях
- 27. Процессоры Intel ® Xeon ® серии 5500 Спасибо за внимание! Вопросы? Новое поколение интеллектуальных серверов
- 28. Linked Foils
- 32. Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details For backup, but not required as part of disclaimer 2005 2009 Delta / Notes Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz with 2M cache Intel® Xeon® X5570 (2.93GHz) Performance per Server 1 8.7x increase Intel internal SPECjbb2005* measurements as of Feb 2009 Server Power Idle / Active Power 228W idle / 382W active 174W idle / 312W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 184 21 ~ 9:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 9 racks 1 rack 9:1 Rack Consolidation Annual Server kWhr 451,474 42,515 90% lower energy costs Total Annual Energy Costs $90,294 $8,502 $81,792 electricity costs per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor Operating System Licensing Costs $165,600 $18,900 $146,700 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Annual Cost Savings of $228,854 Cost of new HW n/a $147,000 Assume $6,900 per server Payback Period of 8 months
- 33. Single Core Performance Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2009 Delta / Notes Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz with 2M cache Intel® Xeon® X5570 (2.93GHz) Performance per Server 1 8.7x increase Intel internal SPECjbb2005* measurements as of Feb 2009 Power Consumption per Server 382W active 312W active Server active 24hr per day Data Center Capability = 1 MW DC Cooling Factor 1.6 PUE 1.6 PUE Same Design PUE = Power Usage Effectiveness. # of Servers 1,636 1,636 Same Footprint Data Center Performance 1 8.7x increase Intel internal SPECjbb2005* measurements as of Feb 2009 Data Center Power 1,000 KW 825 kW 18% Lower Power # of Servers * Svr Power * PUE
- 42. Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details For backup, but not required as part of disclaimer 2005 2009 Delta / Notes Product Intel Xeon 5100 series (3.00GHz) Intel Xeon 5500 series (2.93GHz) Performance per Server 1 3x increase Intel internal SPECjbb2005* measurements as of Feb 2009 Server Power Idle / Active Power 252W idle / 354W active 151W idle / 312W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 63 21 3:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 6 racks 1 rack 3:1 Rack Consolidation Annual kWhr 158,270 40,582 74% lower energy costs Annual Energy Costs $31,654 $8,116 $23,537 electricity costs per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor OS Licensing Costs $56,700 $18,900 $37,800 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Annual Cost Savings of $ Cost of new HW n/a $144,900 Payback Period of 2yrs 5months (< 3 years)
Notas del editor
- Slide Purpose: To discuss where and why IT is spending their limited budget. Get the customer to reflect on their “big picture” IT strategy (how do they utilize their budget) (illustrate on the next 2 slides .. What are the alternatives) IT is increasingly under pressure to innovate!!! Different parts of your organization are clamoring for different needs Internal Users: More performance and Faster Applications CEO – calling for Growth .. Driven by new services, new customers, new markets CFO – calling for lower costs .. Customers .. Calling for new services, faster However, the majority of IT’s annual budget spend is focused on maintaining the capabilities already in place . (talk to the gartner findings on where/how IT is spending their money. (relfect) Where Are You? … Managing Data Center Health is about balancing investment issues in light of your business goals (delivering performance and capability) new technology deployment vs (managing resources – budget, space, power, people) resource management The real benefits of refresh can be gained when you develop an IT strategy that encompasses business needs, available resources, technology roadmap and then optimizes the benefit/cost equation with refresh as an central element Prioritize What’s Most Critical Evolve a Strategy to Maximize Value & Capability over time In many ways … dc refresh is like maintaining your personal health, there are many considerations to balance and regular check-ups and education are constantly required. … And like individuals, each DataCenter and business is unique and prioritizes requirements differently and available assets There is a common approach that every IT department uses … technology refresh of their hardware and software environment … the constant questions are when, how and why
- Key Message: Highlight Intel IT’s investment strategy in we are being extremely proactive. We’re not just talking about it, but doing it.
- Key Message: provide a starting point for the dicscussion on how fast. Intel IT recently conducted a detailed analysis to evaluate how fast was right for them They looked at a variety of aspects of TCO and determined hat 4yrs was maximize ROI taking into account all aspects. This is consistent to other 3 rd party studies about typical refresh Recently I heard the industry average (before) dual-core was 4.5yrs .. Many analysts have stated that with virtualization, the transition to multi-core, and the increasing importance of energy efficiency, the average refresh rate has increased
- Slide Purpose: Communicate the End Benefit and Alternative approaches to Refresh of Older Servers (Build slide) The culmination of the opportunity highlighted in the previous slides are the benefits and approaches you can take in refresh Let’s take the base case of 184 servers (could be any number of servers) .. If you replace each server 1:1 .. You can see a dramatic boost in infrastructure performance due to the per server performance gains available.. However, because the power is lower per server, you can do this with the same data center design and footprint that you have today (no retro-fit of expansion) .. And you can capture a moderate savings in your power bill or about 18% annually Another approach (used by many) is to replace your aging servers with fewer new. If you kept performance of your infrastructure constant (before / after), 9:1 consolidation is possible and a dramatic cost reduction can be gained in areas that depend on server count (like energy costs, software licensing and maintenance fees – among others) .. We estimate that just looking at OS and energy savings, the cost of the new servers could be paid back within 8 months from these savings.
- So Powerful that Even a Dual core refresh makes financial sense with the new Intel microarchitecture Ideal For Space Constrained Businesses or Replacing Servers Coming Off 3-year Lease Terms or due for extended warranty protection. In this situation the payback is not as fast but for servers coming off lease and for businesses looking to be more competitive, address space constraints and reduce operating costs .. A dual core refresh after only 3 years makes good financial and business sense. Extended warranty protection can range from 800-1200 per server for another 2 years. That cost can be up to 20% the value of a new server
- Key Message: Innovation continues, and our next step will be a new platform complete with several new innovations, which extends the leadership IT value prop we have delivered the past few years. Main features: Processor: 4-wide arch (just like Intel Core uarch), 33% more efficient than AMD Opteron (more instruction per clock), more parallelism (33% more micro-ops over 45nm Penryn), enhanced algorithms and branch prediction capabilities Hyper-threading – good for highly threaded apps such as databases, multi-media, search engines Turbo Boost – raises core clock speed when needed above rated speed (performance on demand) Integrated Memory Controller: 3 ch DDR3 memory per socket, up to 144GB (8 GB DIMMs) and 32 GB/s High Bandwidth QuickPath Interconnect: Up to 25.6GB/s per link Performance: Up to 3.5x the bandwidth for technical computing† Up to 2.25x the performance for enterprise computing† 2x software threads and performance boost on demand Energy Efficiency: Highest system level performance/watt† Lower system idle power reduces IT costs Dynamically turns cores on/off to meet performance needs Virtualization: Expand existing pools with Intel VT FlexMigration Unique capabilities for live VM migration over network Highest 2S virtualization scores mean more VMs per server†
- Intel Turbo Boost Technology increases performance of both multi-threaded and single threaded workloads. Intel Turbo Boost Technology is activated when the Operating System (OS) requests the highest processor performance state (P0). The maximum frequency of Intel® Turbo Boost Technology is dependent on the number of active cores. The amount of time the processor spends in the Intel Turbo Boost Technology state depends on the workload and operating environment, providing the performance you need, when and where you need it. Any of the following can set the upper limit of Intel Turbo Boost Technology on a given workload: Number of active cores Estimated current consumption Estimated power consumption Processor temperature When the processor is operating below these limits and the user's workload demands additional performance, the processor frequency will dynamically increase by 133 MHz on short and regular intervals until the upper limit is met or the maximum possible upside for the number of active cores is reached. Conversely, when any of the limits are reached or exceeded, the processor frequency will automatically decrease by 133 MHz until the processor is again operating within its limits. Example for 4C Turbo operation: A database query, which doesn't use any of the processor’s floating point silicon, so it can take advantage of that thermal headroom and increase the frequency of all 4 cores.
- Slide objective: Because of constant advancements in server technology over time as we (Intel) pursue the promise and reality of Moore’s law. The key point to make is that older 2S servers installed in your infrastructure are consuming too much power, space and requires too much maintenance / patching. Gains across a range of industry standard workloads Up to 3.5x the bandwidth for technical computing Up to 2.25x performance for enterprise computing
- New Intel Xeon Processor 7500 (Nehalem-EX) – launching in Q1’10 is best enabler of IT business value we’ve seen in years up to 3x performance gains over existing up to 9x the bandwidth of up to 18x the performance of the most powerful single core servers installed today. 2 ways to use this performance Energy Efficient Refresh: Use 18:1 server replacement or virtualization and achieve a rapid 10 month payback with up to 90% lower operating costs Performance Refresh Use 1:1 server replacement to deliver nearly 18x performance gains within an existing data center design Or Deploy Virtualization: Boost utilization and flexibility of your infrastructure by capitalizing on these performance and energy efficiency gains
- Xeon 5500 brought tremendous generation-to-generation performance jump NHM-EX will bring even higher performance leaps…biggest in Xeon product history Memory bandwidth measured as 9X (made public at May ‘09 NHM-EX press event) Database measured perf is up to 3X (to be made public at Sept ‘09 IDF) Integer and floating point perf #s for NHM-EX are not yet public. But we expect better than EP gen-to gen perf jump Database perf increase is vs standard Dunnington-Caneland platform (comparison vs a Dunnington system using other 3 rd party chipset [ie not Clarksboro IOH] would be different)
- The following assumes your customer is open to purchase, so what to buy? There’s a range of different Xeon® 5500 SKUs available, segmented into three main usage bands – basic, standard, and advanced. Historically, we’ve typically differentiated SKUs primarily by frequency, but the advanced capabilities in the Xeon® 5500 platforms have enabled us to go beyond just frequency to include CPU L3 cache, QPI speed, memory speed, HT, and Turbo. As you spend more, you get more capabilities such as access to higher platform bandwidth, faster memory speeds, and advanced features like HT and Turbo Boost. Most people buy in the standard range as these SKUs offer a great balance of price, performance, and advanced features. If you’re focused on price, you still outstanding performance with the basic SKUs relative to existing products.
- Here’s the performance stacks up with the different segments. As you can see, the “performance shelves” between segments provide a tremendous boost in performance for a relatively small price adder. Additionally, the top-to-bottom performance gains are significantly more than the Xeon® 5400 series - over 80% for Xeon® 5500 vs 30% for Xeon® 5400. Let’s talk about how these performance gains with high-end SKUs can actually LOWER your TCO.
- NHM-EP Server cost assumed $6,900 (assumes OEMs charge a premium at launch) Payback = 21*6900/61,337 = 2year 5month ROI