1. S I P
Synoptic IP’s knowledge repository and news section
The US Supreme Court decided across the world on Monday that when farmers
use licensed seed for more than one planting in violation of their license
agreements, they are liable for harms.
Charged as David vs. Goliath, this case set an Indiana farmer against the
behemoth Monsanto who is related to agro- business.
Very nearly all the soybean farmers in the U.S. use seed that is hereditarily modified to be impervious to weed
killers like Roundup. That permits agriculturists to spray for weeds without executing the soybeans. In any case
the seed is three times more exorbitant than general unpatented seed, so several farmers have attempted to
utilize recovered seed to spare cash.
For example, 75-year-old farmer Hugh Bowman, who customarily purchased Monsanto's Roundup-safe soybean
seed for his first development and consented to an authorizing arrangement guaranteeing to utilize all the seed
and not to utilize any recovered seed for future utilization. Anyhow Bowman likewise had other less secure,
more level yield plantings, and for those, he needed "a shabby wellspring of seed."
So he went to the nearby grain elevator where agriculturists drop off their
gathered soybeans, and he purchased and planted some of those, realizing
that those beans would likely additionally be Roundup-safe.
He in the end processed eight separate yields utilizing the second and third
eras of the grain elevator seed, and he was very open about what he was
doing.
The organization sued Bowman, as it has sued different farmers. Bowman lost
in the lower courts and was strictly ordered to pay $84,000 in harms to
Monsanto. In US Supreme court, there the investigation before the judges set
two lawful precepts against one another. One precept, referred to in fact as
patent depletion, says that once you purchase an item — say, a cell phone —
you can do with it whatever you need. You can utilize it, offer it, and also offer
it to your children, whatever. Anyhow a second patent principle says you are
prohibited to duplicate it.
So which govern will be associated for Bowman's situation? The Supreme
Court said unanimously that Bowman's activities added up to illicit replicating
of a licensed item, a kind of cultivating theft.
Synoptic IPSimplified Solutions
US Supreme court ruling:
“Patent exhaustion does not
permit a farmer to reproduce
patented seeds through
planting and harvesting
without the patent holder's
permission.”
© 2013 – 2014 Synoptic Intellectual Patents Private Limited. All Rights Reserved.
ART004 – 30th April, 2014
Synoptic IP News updates and articles
A epic decision by US Supreme Court in the case of Monsanto
Company v Bowman

2. For a free trial of our services, please write us at
info@synopticip.com OR
Synoptic Intellectual Patents Pvt. Ltd.
G1 Ideal House 69
Nehru Place, New Delhi
Delhi-110019
+91-120-454-1298 (India), +44 2032873323 (UK)
Patentability/Novelty Search
InvaliditySearch
Patent Drafting
State-of-the-Art/Landscape Analysis
Infringer identification
Technology Trend Analysis
Freedom-to-OperateSearch
Claim Charting/EoU IdentificationPatent Docketing
Synoptic IP Simplified searching solution to your IP
www.synopticip.com
Synoptic IP
SimplifiedSolutions
Patent Prosecution Support
• Patentability/ Novelty search
• Patent drafting
• Illustrations/ Drawing
Preparation
• Office Action Response
• Infringement Search
• Claim charting/ EoU Identification
• Freedom-to-Operate Search
• Infringers/ Licensee identification
• State-of-the-Art/ Landscape
Analysis
• Technology Trend Analysis
• White space/ spot analysis
• Patent Filing in India
• Patent Docketing
• Proof Reading
• Alerts and Watches
Synoptic IP, is an Intellectual Property Research firm based in India, providing efficacious patent research services to their clients across the globe. We bring a
team of dedicated technical experts hailing from meritorious academic backgrounds, committed to provide a diverse range of patent research services.
We provide the highest standards of quality assurance to clients with our in-depth understanding of the subject matter in hand and suitably customized services
pertaining to varied domains of science and technology. Our state-of-the-art methodologies help us maintain and appraise the quality of a project at every break
point and consign precise, glitch-free reports to our clients.
About Synoptic IP
Research and Analytics Patent Litigation and Licensing support Other service
Read more
For more details, please contact:
Ankit Saxena, Director – Research
ankit.saxena@synopticip.com
+91-9560266647
Compiling for the high court, Justice Elena Kagan said that Bowman is splendidly allowed to buy grain
elevator beans to consume or food to animals, or even to exchange, however he couldn't do what he, truth
be told, plant the beans from the grain elevators in his own particular fields, test them for weed safety, and
afterward gather, re-harvest and re-harvest numerous times, without paying Monsanto for utilization of its
licensed item.
Kagan said, without this assurance for Monsanto, company will enjoy "not enough profit" from its creation,
and Bowman and different agriculturists might harvest extraordinary rewards from the weed-safe seed
without paying for it.
Kagan likewise rejected Bowman's contention that since soybeans commonly self-recreate by growing, it
was the soybean, not Bowman himself, which made replications of the Monsanto's protected development.
Monsanto and different agribusiness ventures were typically satisfied by the decisions.