1. A White Paper
Computerized Physician Order Entry
Weighing the benefits and challenges of implementation
Rhonda Joyner
HMIA 5060
Final Examination
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Explore Purpose of Health Information
Technologies
Statement of Issue
Background/History
Benefits
Negative impacts
Strategies
Conclusion
References
3.
4. PURPOSE OF HITS
The national health care expenditure was
approximately $2.6 trillion with an anticipated
growth rate of 5.8% over the next 10 years.
Health care expenditures have grown at a faster
rate than the national gross domestic product rate. 1
Health Information Technologies can
increase efficiency and effectiveness
5. WHAT IS COMPUTERIZED PHYSICIAN ORDER
ENTRY (CPOE)?
A mechanism for physicians
and medical professionals to
order medications electronically
through computers or smart
phones.
This order is then recorded for
patient records and dispersal of
medication and may facilitate
the exchange of information
amongst other providers. 8
6.
7. The Government Has Stepped In To Ensure That The
Healthcare Industry Increase Its Utilization Of
Technology.
THE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
2009 AMERICAN RECOVERY AND
REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA) FOR ECONOMIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH
(HITECH) ACT
Provided $19 billion to
encourage healthcare Included a provision worth $560 million
to provide states with funding to increase
providers to adopt and
their Health Information Exchanges
use health information (HIEs).
technologies (HITs) and $17 billion to provide increased Medicare
electronic health payments to hospitals and physician in
records (EHR) within exchange for usage of certified EHR
their organizations. systems, known as “meaningful use”. 1
Key element is the implementation of
Computerized Physician Order Entry
(CPOE).
WHAT ACTS?
8. WHY IS CPOE IMPORTANT?
CPOE is considered to be Stage 1 of the
meaningful use criteria, and provides health
care providers with the qualification for the
HITECH incentives.
Providers that meet the meaningful use
guidelines by 2014 will qualify for incentive
payments. Others will be penalized if
implementation is not achieved by 2014. 8
9. MEANINGFUL USE DEFINED
Meaningful use (MU), as defined by
SearchHealthIT, is “the use of electronic
health records (EHR) and related technology
within a healthcare organization.” 7
Qualifies healthcare organizations for
financial incentives from Medicare and
Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. 6
10.
11. FEW TAKERS….
Study conducted in 2009 indicated:
1.5% of hospitals in the U.S. utilized an
electronic record system within all clinical units.
7.6% of the hospitals had at least one clinical
unit utilizing a system.1, 4
4% of physicians indicated having extensive
systems
13% only reporting a basic electronic system. 1,5
12. CHALLENGES
High Operating Costs
Interruption of work flow
May increase errors
Lack of technical capabilities
Physician Buy In and Trust
13.
14. BENEFITS
CPOE is an effort to reduce medication, and
paper errors and increase proficiency within
healthcare organizations and results in
overall cost savings if implemented correctly.
It is estimated that medication errors
results in a national cost of $2 billion
annually. 9
15. 2009 STUDY RESULTS RELEASED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY
COLLABORATIVE AND THE NEW ENGLAND HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE
Stated that cost of Indicated that CPOE
CPOE implementation could reduce the 770,000
could provide annual hospital deaths and
savings of $2.7 million injurers that are caused
for a hospital. 9 , by adverse drug events
Relative to the cost
(ADEs).
Preventable ADEs incidents
of approximately cost each hospital $5.6 million
$2.1 million and annually
$435,000 for yearly Considered the leading cause
of death (excluding death by
maintenance motor vehicle, Aids, and
breast cancer). 9
98,000 deaths occur annually
due to medical errors.10
16. ADDITIONAL BENEFITS
“Free of handwriting identification problems
Faster to reach the pharmacy
Less subject to error associated with similar drug names
More easily integrated into medical records and decision-support
systems
Less subject to errors caused by use of apothecary measures
Easily linked to drug-drug interaction warnings
More likely to identify the prescribing physician
Able to link to ADE reporting systems
Able to avoid specification errors, such as trailing zeros
Available and appropriate for training and education
Available for immediate data analysis, including post marketing reporting
Claimed to generate significant economic savings
With online prompts, CPOE systems can
Link to algorithms to emphasize cost-effective medications
Reduce under prescribing and overprescribing
Reduce incorrect drug choices” 12
19. ERRORS CAUSED BY CPOE
“Role of computerized physician order entry
systems in facilitating medication errors” article
by Koppel et al., discusses a study conducted at
“a major urban tertiary-care teaching hospital
with 750 beds, 39, 000 annual discharges, and
a widely used CPOE system (TDS) operational
there from 1997 to 2004.”
This study uncovered 22 types of medication
errors that occurred as a result of the CPOE
system.
20. CPOE ERRORS AS IDENTIFIED BY STUDY
Information Errors Human-Machine Interface
Flaws
Assumed Dose Information Patient Selection
Medication Discontinuation Wrong Medication Selection
Failures Unclear Log On/Log Off
Procedure-Linked Medication Failure to Provide Medications
Discontinuation Faults After Surgery
Immediate Orders and Give-as- Postsurgery “Suspended”
Needed Medication Medications
Discontinuation Faults
Loss of Data, Time, and Focus
Antibiotic Renewal Failure When CPOE Is Nonfunctional
Diluent Options and Errors Sending Medications to Wrong
Allergy Information Delay Rooms When the Computer
Conflicting or Duplicative System Has Shut Down
Medications Late-in-Day Orders Lost for 24
Hours
Role of Charting Difficulties in
Inaccurate and Delayed
Medication Administration
Inflexible Ordering
21. Study that compares two CPOE system implementation to determine the
pediatric mortality rate after implementation of this system in pediatric intensive
care units.
CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURG CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AND REGIONAL MEDICAL
(CHP) CENTER (CHRMC) IN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Involved 1942 children Involved 2533 pediatric
Conducted over a period of patients
18 months (13 pre- Conducted for a total of 26
implementation and 5 post- months, 13 pre/ 13 post-
Implementation). implementation.
Indicated an increased No significant increase in
morality of 6.6% from 2.8%. the mortality rate after
CPOE implementation.
DOES COPE INCREASE MORTALITY?
22. VARIANCE IN STUDY RESULTS
CHP study had a smaller population size due to the difference in
the period of study, 18 months (CHP) and 26 months (CHRMC).
Demographics of population were also younger, and study
included transferred patients.
Use and application of data mining and statistical analysis varied.
Different approaches to implementation in terms of time
frame, training, and availability and use of subject matter experts.
Procedural and logistical changes were implemented at the same
time as CPOE implementation at CHP which had a negative
impact on effectiveness and efficiency of care.
CHRMC personnel had an opportunity to review the results of
CHP and visit with the staff to improve implementation errors
which provided a second mover advantage.
23. CRITICAL FLAWS IN CHP STUDY
Short implementation period of only six days.
Order entry could not occur until a patient was
physically in the hospital. As a result, critical
patients in transit could not have their
medications processed and ordered until arrival
to the hospital.
ICU pharmacy moved to a centralized pharmacy
not near ICU unit.
This pharmacy could not dispense medication
until physician ordered through the CPOE
system.
Predetermined order sets were not established
in the CPOE system prior to implementation.
24. REASONS FOR CPOE ERRORS
The qualitative data was an important
element that impacted the CHP
implementation.2
Workflow changes
Lack of Order Sets
Lack of Sufficient Training
Technical Capabilities
27. JOAN S. ASH FROM THE OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY AT
PORTLAND
Presents the following recommendations for
implementation:
“now the CPOE implementation success depends primarily
on
1) Time considerations (response time and user time),
2) Meeting information needs (using order sets),
3) Multidimensional integration (especially with work flow),
4) The existence of essential people (leaders and support
staff, plus involved clinicians),
5) certain foundational underpinnings (e.g. trust between
administrators and clinicians), and
6) Improvement through evaluation and learning (paying
attentions to user feedback)” 2
28. FRANK FEAR WRITES IN “GOVERNANCE FIRST, TECHNOLOGY
SECOND, TO EFFECTIVE CPOE DEPLOYMENT”
Planning a CPOE around the actual workflow
of organization is the key to long-term
success.
Identifying and developing order sets in
advance to implementation may lead to long
term success.
Order steps should be broad and general,
instead of specific to allow for adjustment as
physicians learn more about their system
needs and requirements. 14
29. “A RASCH MODEL ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGY USAGE IN
MINNESOTA HOSPITALS” BY JOHN OLSON ET AL.
Indicates that prior Identifies the “human factor”
technological and as being a critical
organizational component of this process.
knowledge is a function Gradually integrate
of technical capabilities. HIT, allowing physicians the
opportunities to develop
Recommendation is to capabilities at a slower pace.
implement EHR prior to Identifying physician or nurse
CPOE implementation.1 “champions” of a system can
CPOE was identified as a also gain overall “credibility”
challenging system that of a project.
should be implemented Providing continuous training
as capabilities of hospitals may increase effectiveness
increase. 1,15 and reduce errors.1,15
30.
31. HITS ARE EFFECTIVE TOOLS
HITs can provide efficiency and effectiveness
in healthcare.1,2
CPOE meets the Stage 1 meaningful use
requirements and provides a financial
incentive for implementation.1
32. TO ENCOURAGE SUCCESSFUL INTEGRATION
Healthcare organization must understand the
difficulty of HIT systems and consider EHR
implementation prior to CPOE
Organizations must also analyze the workflow and
establish broad order sets that will enable change
and input from physicians.14
The “human factor” is a critical component of this
process.1,15
Slow implementation
Training and developing subject matter experts who can
serve as “champions” will increase the success rate of
integration. 1,15
33. REFERENCES
1. Kovner AR, Knickman JR. Health Policy and Health Reform. In Kovner AR, Knickman JR, eds. Health Care Delivery in the United States, 10th
ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing, 2011: 258;332-346 .
2. E. Ammenwerth, J. Talmon, J. S. Ash, D. W. Bates, M.-C. Beuscart-Zéphir, A. Duhamel, P. L. Elkin, R. M. Gardner, A. Geissbuhler . Impact of
CPOE on Mortality Rates - Contradictory Findings, Important Messages. Methods of Information in Medicine, Volume 45, Number 6 (2006), pp.
586-593, http://ejournals.ebsco.com.jproxy.lib.ecu.edu/direct.asp?ArticleID=4C5DB8ED74371FCADE14
3. Baker R. FOOD: McDonald's explores digital touchscreens. Marketing Week. 2011:4-4.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/867470901?accountid=10639.
4. Jha, Ashish K,Md, Mph, Desroches CM, Drph, Campbell EG, Phd, et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med.
2009;360(16):1628-38.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/223918199?accountid=10639. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0900592.
5. Desroches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care -- A national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med.
2008;359(1):50-60. http://search.proquest.com/docview/223924831?accountid=10639. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0802005.
6. Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) resource page. SearchHealthIT Website
http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/definition/computerized-physician-order-entry-CPOE . Accessed December 1, 2012.
7. Meaningful Use resource page. Search HealthIT Web site http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/definition/meaningful-use . Accessed
December 1, 2012.
8. Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 1 of 15. CMS.Gov Web site http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-
Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/1_CPOE_for_Medication_Orders.pdf . Accessed December 1, 2012.
9. Orient JM. Saving lives and saving money: Transforming health and healthcare. JAMA. 2004;291(2):251-251.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/211343632?accountid=10639.
10. Leapfrog Fact Sheet. Leapfrog Group Web site http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/leapfrog_factsheet.pdf . Accessed December
1, 2012.
11. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, al e. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA.
2005;293(10):1197-203. http://search.proquest.com/docview/211390158?accountid=10639.
12. Metzger J, Wetebob E, Bates DW, Lipsitz S, Classen DC. Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry.
Health Aff. 2010;29(4):655-63. http://search.proquest.com/docview/204628716?accountid=10639.
13. Ohsfeldt, R. L., Ward, M. M., Schneider, J. E., Jaana, M., & al, e. (2005). Implementation of hospital computerized physician order entry
systems in a rural state: Feasibility and financial impact. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(1), 20-7. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/220785200?accountid=10639
14. Fear F. Governance first, technology second to effective CPOE deployment. Health Manag Technol. 2011;32(8):6-7.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/885082371?accountid=10639.
15. Olson JR, Belohlav JA, Cook LS. A Rasch model analysis of technology usage in Minnesota hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2012
(August);81(8):527-538.
16. Hopkins K. Cpoe: Errors can increase with use of computerized order entry system-maybe. Hospitals & Health Networks. 2005;4(2):47-47.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/215315160?accountid=10639.