Presented by Karl M. Rich at the Training program for “Methods for livestock value chain analysis: Qualitative and quantitative methods”, ILRI, Nairobi, 1 July 2013
4. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Are they really that different? Actually, not really.
• All (the good ones!) are based on the IDS platform of
value chain analysis (Kaplinsky and Morris 2001) that
outlines the basics of what’s behind a value chain and
VCA.
• The newer toolkits add some new twists and emphasize
slightly different things, but at the roots are mainly the
same.
VCA toolkits
5. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• In this course, we will primarily focus on the original IDS
methodology for value chain analysis
• However, we will highlight, reference, and add to this
themes from:
– ValueLinks
– The SCM and strategy literature
• For each of the different steps, we will do a practical
exercise as well.
VCA toolkits
6. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Key elements to any value chain analysis
– Mapping the chain
– Identifying governance structures within the chain
– Exploring areas of upgrading within the chain
– Assessing benefits in chain participation
• ValueLinks (rightly) adds additional elements for practitioners (i.e.,
those creating or engaging with VCs):
– Assessment of value chain for promotion
– How to implement and facilitate VC promotion (linkages, finance,
environment)
– Monitoring and evaluation
Steps in value chain analysis
7. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• If the interest is in establishing a value chain, placing
boundaries on what to establish is critical.
• Main tasks:
– Scope of markets and market segments to be promoted
– Market research (does demand exist?)
– Defining priorities across products and value chains
Step zero: which value chain to promote
8. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Market scoping:
– Develop hierarchies of product classifications (start at sub-
sector, work down to value chain and sub-chain) to establish
appropriate segments
– Provide rationales for why (or why not) such segments might
make sense
Step zero: which value chain to promote
11. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Market research:
– Assess current market demand and potential
– Conditions of market entry and competition
– Competitive advantage of value chain operators in market
• To add to this, consider potential competitive strategy
(remember Porter earlier!)
Step zero: which value chain to promote
12. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Priority setting
– Establish criteria assessing growth potential
– Establish criteria assessing potential along other dimensions
(e.g., poverty alleviation, environmental protection, etc.)
– Pragmatic criteria (chances of success, sustainability)
Step zero: which value chain to promote
14. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Your tasks:
– For your sector, define a particular commodity or service in
which you wish to further develop?
– From this commodity or service, which sub-products/chains
could be considered and why? (recall the table before)
– How would you rank between different VCs to promote?
Develop a set of criteria (with weights) and evaluate the
potential of these VCs along those criteria.
Exercise 1: Selecting a value chain
16. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 1: Mapping the value chain
Key goals:
• Assess the characteristics of actors and their linkages
• Understand role of chain activities in terms of broader livelihoods context
(profit/income)
• Identify service providers and roles of public sector
• Characterize business environment of the chain
• Compute flows of goods throughout the chain, including prices and
seasonal variation
• Compute inventories that exist in the chain
17. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Main outputs:
– Graphical maps of actor linkages and product flows (between
actors and across space)
– Quantification of role of activity in livelihoods
– Identification of production practices and costs
– Typologies of chain actors based on income
– Identification of different chains based on relationships, etc.
– Transactions costs and chain constraints
Step 1: Mapping the value chain
21. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Garissa livestock marketing value chain
Local Somali producers
Somalia
Garissa Market
Traders
Traders, brokers,
trekkers (60% of cattle)
Butcheries GSA
Traders
NRB. & MSA (66% cattle;63% shoats
Meat W/sellers
Meat Retailers
Consumers
Brokers
S/house, Transporters
KMC
Ranches
Traders, brokers, sellers of fodder etc.
Butcheries
Supermarkets
Abroad
Shipping agencies
CARE LIME Project
Consumers GSA
Hotels
Transporters, trekers
From Wanyoike and Rich (2007)
22. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Ijala livestock marketing value chain
Livestock Producers
Kotile Mkt
Small scale traders
Other Mkts in IjaraBrokers
Garissa Mkt
Traders (cattle)
Ranches in coast Mkts in coastBrokers
Traders, transporters, trekkers
Butcheries/retail outlets
Meat w/sellers, abattoirs, transporters
abattoirs
Export countries
Consumers
Traders
Local butchers
Local Butcheries
abattoir
Consumers
From Wanyoike and Rich (2007)
32. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 1: Mapping the value chain
• So far, lots of pretty pictures!
• But, we can add some quantitative analysis here:
– Volumes and values of product flows
– Levels of inventories (important later in governance section)
– Numbers of operators/jobs/employees in each segment
– Market shares
– Value-added calculations (but be careful here!)
39. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Exercise 2: Value chain mapping
• Stay in the same groups as before and consider one of
the VCs you identified in the last exercise.
• First, map the functions in the VC: how do you get the
product from producers to consumers? Are there
different processes for different channels? Denote these
using a
• Next, determine the operators taking the functions
above. Denote these using a
41. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 2: Governance in the value chain
• Main ideas:
– Identify the nature of relationships and
coordination mechanisms that exist between
actors in the value-chain.
– Provide details on aspects of the business
environment of the chain
– Identify power relationships in the value chain
42. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 2: Governance in the value chain
• Main outputs:
– Who decides what is produced
– How the rules of trade are determined
– The nature of relationships between the participants
– Roles of associations
– Coordination mechanisms (contracts, market sales,
etc)
– The extent of chain “power,” based on the relative
size of a particular actor, share of chain profits, or
control over a key technology
43. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Types of coordination
– Arms length (spot markets)
– Full vertical coordination (total integration of supply chain)
– Intermediate forms (contracts, etc. – in between arms length and
full coordination)
• While usually described in a narrative, it is useful to map
governance relationships graphically too.
Step 2: Governance in the value chain
45. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Structures of governance
Governance
type
Complexity
of
transactions
Ability to
codify
transactions
Capabilities
in the supply
base
Market Low High High *
Modular High High High
Relational High Low High
Captive High High Low
Hierarchy High Low Low
Source: Gereffi et al (2005):90
50. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Issues related to the nature of production matter as well.
Take, for instance, inventories.
• Some nodes of the value chain will retain excess
inventories (why?).
• These inventories, and their management, will influence
not just the organization of the chain, but the bargaining
ability of actors.
Step 2: Governance in the value chain
51. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Exercise 3a: Value chain governance
• In your same groups, take your previous value chain map and
identify the governance links between each node.
• Distinguish between:
– Market-based governance
– Contractual or hybrid governance
– Vertical integration
• Identify in the chain which actor(s) coordinate activities, in terms of
setting rules, market power, etc. Is the chain buyer- or producer-
driven?
52. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Governance is not just about coordination forms, but about the specific
nature of the relationships behind those.
• Based on your knowledge of your value chain, discuss in a short narrative
(bullet points OK) the nature of relationships between different links in the
value chain, focusing on:
– Who decides what is produced
– The nature of production itself (inventories at each node)
– How the rules of trade are determined
– Power relationships
– Roles of associations
• Based on your knowledge of the chain and the last figure, to what extent will
governance change in the chain you are promoting?
Exercise 3b: Value chain governance
53. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• The usual way we think about upgrading in value chain
analysis are ways to add value for specific actors in the chain
• Four types of upgrading can be identified:
– Product upgrading
– Process upgrading
– Functional upgrading
– Chain upgrading
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
54. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
• Product upgrading: improving existing products and/or developing
new ones
• Process upgrading: improving efficiency of internal and external
processes within the chain
• Functional upgrading: changing one’s position within the chain to
add value
• Chain upgrading: moving to a new VC altogether.
Can you think of examples of each?
55. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
• Main outputs:
– What are the opportunities for adding value in the chain? How
do governance or other constraints influence this?
– What are the drivers for change? What are the incentives?
• Tasks:
– What is the vision for upgrading?
– Opportunities and constraints (SWOT analysis)
– Operational objectives for upgrading
– Actors involved in upgrading (role of governance important!)
– Impact of upgrading (trickier – related to step 4 on benefits)
56. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Vision defines what the VC is all about – its value
proposition
• Vision provides strategic direction and perspective –
focus is on the competitive issues facing the VC
• Vision provides a basis for joint ownership and common
goals among participants
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
57. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Upgrading vision is combined with strategies needed to
achieve this in action, in terms of improving processes,
capacity, and relationships.
• These strategies should be viewed from the standpoint of
the different types of upgrading discussed earlier.
• One should also not lose sight of governance aspects
either
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
64. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
• SWOT analysis is a good tool to assess the opportunities
and constraints present in a given chain
• This is combined with the strengths and weaknesses of
the current chain to give context to capacity to engage in
upgrading.
• SWOT can be done graphically on the chain map or in
tabular form.
68. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
• For those engaged in value chain development,
operationalizing upgrading is a key component.
• Main ideas:
– Identify and prioritize actions to be taken
– Link enablers and enabling activities to upgrading strategies in
the value chain
– Identify “champions” in the chain itself to pursue such actions.
72. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 3: Identify opportunities for
upgrading in the value chain
• The identification of “champions” in the chain itself to
pursue such actions is critical.
• This can include capacity development to upgrade the
skills of those involved in value chain upgrading.
76. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Christensen (1997) looked at the dynamics of innovation and new
product development, exploring the paradox of why successful firms
often fail to keep up with technology advances.
• Leading firms often focus on one technology or specific attribute of a
product that allows competitors to displace them by focusing on
other, disrupting technologies
• These disrupting technologies may not be as good in the short-run,
but over time can become more popular.
Dynamics of innovation
77. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• Meanwhile, leading firms are locked into existing VCs that prevent
them from changing course until it’s too late.
• These firms took existing needs of the market as given, rather than
looking at new technologies as a source of innovation for new
markets
Dynamics of innovation
79. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
This figure graphically illustrates the model of Christensen (1997). When the product offerings of an
incumbent firm over time overshoot market needs for a particular product attribute, there is an opportunity for
new firms to emerge with a disruptive technology that may be inferior to the existing product in some ways,
but meet market needs in others. As the disruptive technology improves, it often displaces the incumbent.
80. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Once the market need for a specific product attribute has been met,
opportunities for competition will shift towards other attributes, creating
opportunities for innovation as the market is oversupplied on different
attributes. Eventually, competition may end up on the basis of price rather
than differentiation along attributes.
82. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Exercise 4: Upgrading in the value chain
• For your group’s existing value chain, do the following
– Identify an upgrading vision, as well activities to implement viz.:
• What are the strategies required
• What types of upgrading does it involve
• How would it look visually in your chain?
– Where are the constraints in your vision? Map these, along with the
opportunities, in your value chain diagram
• Use for opportunities, for constraints
– Which chain actors and enablers could facilitate these upgrading
strategies, and where might capacity strengthening be needed?
83. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 4: Distributional issues
• Value chain analysis can be used to identify who gains
and who loses in value chains.
• It can also be used to assess the impact of different
upgrading strategies … sort of
• One component of this is calculating how value-added is
distributed among chain participants
84. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
Step 4: Distributional issues
• An overlooked component of distributional
aspects is that the size of the pie is as important,
if not more so, than the distribution.
• Policies that increase total value chain profits
benefit all actors, even if particular shares for
some are small.
• Both issues need to be taken into account.
87. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
• How do we do this in the field?
– Stakeholder interviews
– Focus groups
– Semi-structured interviews
– Primary surveys
– Supplementary secondary data
– Personal observations
– Other “creative” techniques (e.g. flagging down trucks)
Methods of data collection
88. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
What are the strengths of value chain analysis?
• It is systematic: it provides a tested, peer-reviewed, and
organized analytical framework to look at value chains that is
multi-disciplinary in approach
• It provides a holistic overview of the supply chain, actors, and
relationships, based on fieldwork and primary data collection
with key stakeholders
89. Norwegian Institute
of International
Affairs
Norsk
Utenrikspolitisk
Institutt
What are the weaknesses of value chain analysis?
• Over-emphasis on constraints, under-emphasis on solutions
• Ignorance of feedbacks present in value chain
• Lack of quantitative rigor: difficult/impossible to rank policies to
improve value chains and smallholder participation
• Limited insights on how to put recommendations into action:
how do we capture innovation processes to add value for
smallholders?