1. The Necessity of Government-Mandated Paid Maternity Leave in the United States
for
Master of Professional Studies
Strategic Human Resources Management and Development
Charlotte Mahony
University of Denver University College
July 30, 2016
Faculty: Michelle Kruse-Crocker, PhD and Allison O’Grady, MA
Director: Pat Greer, MBA PHR
Dean: Michael J. McGuire, MLS

2. Mahony-i
Abstract
Currently, the United States is the only OECD and G7 member that does not offer a
statutory paid maternity leave entitlement to its female working citizens, calling its
membership in both organizations and its global reputation into question. Businesses who have
implemented this benefit without federal mandate see many positive outcomes, despite initial
fears over the cost of administration. This capstone demonstrates how the benefit increases an
organization’s ability to attract, engage and retain talent and improve employee well-being. It
will propose an approach to garner support for the creation of legislation through professional
channels. The findings show that the positive effects of the implementation of the entitlement
are much greater than the negative repercussions of the upfront cost.

3. Mahony-ii
Table of Contents
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. i
Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………………………………..... ii
Background………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
Importance of Topic…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1
Problem Statement……………………………………………………………………………………………… 3
Approach…………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 4
Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………………………....... 8
Statutory Paid Maternity Leave Around the World………………………………………………. 9
Paid Maternity Leave in the United States…………………………………………………………… 11
The Business Case for Paid Maternity Leave……………………………………………………….. 11
Paid Maternity Leave and Maternal and Child Well-Being………………………………….. 14
Paid Maternity Leave and Work-Life Balance……………………………………………………… 15
Paid Maternity Leave and the Disparate Impact of FMLA……………………………………. 16
Solution……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 19
Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 21
Strengths……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 21
Weaknesses…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23
Opportunities………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24
Threats………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25
Trends…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 26
Recommendations…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26
Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 28
References………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 29

4. Mahony-1
Background
The United States is often perceived as a progressive innovator in terms of labor policies
and worker rights, especially compared to other countries around the globe. While the
International Labour Organization (ILO), an agency of the United Nations, and its members did
not adopt a convention mandating the right of workers to organize and maintain union
membership without fear of discrimination until 1948, the US passed the National Labor
Relations act 13 years prior. But concerning basic human protections, the U.S. is consistently
behind other nations. Perhaps most shockingly, as of 2016 the United States is the only
“developed economy” in the ILO that does not offer a statutory paid maternity leave
entitlement to its female working citizens (ILO 2014, 3). Regarding this necessary protection,
the United States is an outlier (Livingston 2013).
Importance of Topic
Building on its partnership with the ILO beginning in 1919, the United States further
dedicated its commitment to fair labor standards by helping to form the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development in 1961 (ILO 2016b; OECD 2016a). In 2011, the ILO
and the OECD issued a new Memorandum of Understanding, in which each committed to
continued cooperation, “as an efficient and effective means to achieving their shared objectives
including monitoring and assessing…employment situations and the impact of labour market
and social policies” (ILO 2011, 1). The U.S.' participation in both groups reinforces its public
commitment to fair labor and employment standards.
Adding to its considerable global influence regarding market practices is the United
States’ membership in the Group of Seven, created to, “facilitate collective action,” around

5. Mahony-2
issues such as, “global economic governance” (Council on Foreign Relations 2015, under
“Introduction”). The United States’ membership in all three organizations and partnerships, in
addition to its status as a developed country and a world leader in economic performance,
indicates the duty the country has to promote and implement the most beneficial employment
and labor policies.
To secure membership in the ILO, OECD, and the G7, the United States committed to
upholding the goals and missions of each organization. Similarly, human resource professionals
commit to implementing and supporting human resource management best practices within
their organizations. By definition, human resource management is the formal approach to the
management of human capital within an organization. Effective organizations use human
resource management practices to promote organizational goals and objectives through
policies and systems that balance employee well-being with government regulations and
business strategy.
Finding policies that can satisfy these three requirements can be quite challenging.
Fortunately, a statutory paid maternity leave benefit can do all three. Organizations will be
forced to implement the benefit due to government mandate, and in doing so will meet a goal
of compliance. Providing employees with this benefit will allow organizations to promote work-
life balance and foster engagement. Engaged employees will be more committed to helping the
organization achieve its strategic goals and objectives. Simply put, a paid maternity leave
benefit, statutory or not, is a smart business move.

6. Mahony-3
Problem Statement
With the significant influence afforded to members of the G-7 plus its standing within
the OECD as a “Developed Economy,” the U.S. is in the unique position to adopt policies and
practices that set a standard for governments around the world (ILO 2014, 3). But in the case of
statutory paid maternity leave benefits, the United States remains an aberration. In 2016, the
U.S. is the only OECD member and the only G-7 country that does not offer government-
mandated paid maternity leave to its working female citizens (OECD 2016b, under “Summary of
paid leave entitlements available to mothers”). This reflects poorly on the country’s status as a
developed economy, and puts its reputation of a leader in ethical and fair treatment of workers
in jeopardy.
In its fiftieth anniversary vision statement, the OECD and its members reaffirmed their
commitment to, “increase growth in our economies, generate jobs and increase living
standards,” by developing, “effective strategies to increase employment opportunities,” which
support, “high-quality…health, and social-protection policies” (OECD 2011, 2). Similar to the
mission of the OCED, the G7 declare their commitment to upholding human rights and, “the
empowerment of women” (Group of Seven 2015, under “State of the Global Economy”). As the
only OECD member that offers, “no statutory entitlement to paid leave on a national basis,”
and the only G7 member without a legislative sanction of paid maternity leave, the United
States’ actions are directly contrary to the shared vision of both organizations (OECD 2016b, 2).
Even more concerning, by not having a statutory paid maternity leave entitlement, the
United States is acting in opposition to its commitment to the creation and maintenance of a
prospering workforce. Historically, the country’s prosperity and economic growth were

7. Mahony-4
achieved, “through an implicit partnership of federal, state and local governments,” with the
federal government providing overall financial security,”” (Berger and Fisher 2013, under
“Introduction”). However, as state and local governments embrace a more expansive role in
economic policy, their primary means of power becomes tax cuts offered to businesses that
operate in the state (Berger and Fisher 2013). To cut taxes, many of the programs that benefit
workers are discontinued. The federal government must reassume its original role of ensuring,
“that the economy never veer[ed] too far from full employment” (Berger and Fisher 2013,
under “Introduction”). Federally mandated benefits for workers can fulfill this duty.
It seems rather unusual that one sanction would allow the United States to take steps
not only toward its commitment to a prospering workforce but also to uphold the membership
pledges of both the OECD and the G7, but here that is the case. Implementation of a statutory
paid maternity leave entitlement for working female citizens will allow the United States to
fulfill its membership duties in the OCED and G7, while ensuring the promotion of a prospering
workforce.
Approach
The subject of a paid maternity leave entitlement arose after finding a social media post
about a pregnant female employee attempting to crowd-source funds to cover her upcoming
leave. This lead to casual initial research of the topic using the websites of Google, the Society
for Human Resources Management and the Harvard Business Review. This initial research
played an integral role in informing the overall research process as well as guiding the topic
scope. It was quickly apparent that paid leave (maternity, sick, etc.) is a hot topic in the field of
human resource management as well as economically focused and labor-centric U.S.

8. Mahony-5
government departments and agencies. Also, this casual research emphasized the importance
of comparison of entitlements on a global scale. The literature review was conducted in an
attempt to solidify and direct the scope of the topic, to provide insight into the current and
historical research on the subject and contribute to the recommendations prepared as a
portion of the solution.
A search for sources to be used in the literature review was administered in three steps:
database identification, keyword search, and choice of applicable articles. Google Scholar was
identified as the most appropriate database based on the type of source that it would return
and the expanse of its search capabilities. The first keyword search utilized the following terms
or phrases: statutory paid leave, paid parental leave, retention, attraction, total rewards, HR
practices, total rewards compensation strategy, employee well-being, well-being and
mandatory benefits. To narrow the scope of the search, only articles that came from peer-
reviewed journals, government agencies, or distinguished research centers were used. Articles
were additionally classified with search parameters of a publishing date of 2000 or after, with a
specific emphasis on finding articles published after 2012, although articles used for historical
reference or that provided the foundations for research in the field conducted post-2012 were
not held to the same criteria.
Further review of common forms of comparison between different countries from the
keyword search solidified the choice to use the OECD, ILO, and G7 as a barometer for standard
behavior and articles with data that did not use these entities or their member countries as a
reference were discarded. Due to the global importance of these partnerships, this capstone
will use the standards and member conventions of the ILO, the OECD and the G7 as a measure

9. Mahony-6
of acceptable labor practices around the world. The first keyword search helped to solidify the
scope of the topic as statutory, paid maternity leave (paternity and parental leave not
included), revealed common avenues for comparison of labor practices across the globe and
brought focus to the standard HRM (human resource management) practices the topic
supports.
Sources for the capstone were chosen from the articles that were found using the initial
keyword search. Articles selected had a subject that could be grouped into one of four
categories or some combination thereof: HRM practices (specifically attraction, retention, and
engagement); global labor practices surrounding statutory entitlements; child or maternal well-
being; and case studies of states, countries or businesses which currently have a paid maternity
leave benefit. Categories were determined based on the potential usefulness of an article to
the literature review and additional sections of the capstone. The category of the article was
determined after reading the abstract and establishing relevance to the overall topic.
The case studies were used to provide demonstrable evidence that implementation of a
similar program in the U.S. at a federal level will have similar results. Data from the HRM
practices category will be used to provide evidence of return on investment for the businesses
that will be forced to implement them upon passing of legislation. Data from the global labor
practices category was used to provide evidence of the existence of statutory paid maternity
leave practices in other OECD countries as well as a reference for potential regulatory
guidelines in the U.S. in the solution portion of the capstone. Articles placed in the HRM
practices category had to have documented proof of the benefit’s return on investment; those
that did not were discarded.

10. Mahony-7
Once categorized, full text of the article was pulled for detailed review. The reference
list of sources that fit into more than one category was investigated to determine other
relevant articles suitable for use. An additional keyword search using some of the keywords
previously named was conducted using the DU Summon database at the University of Denver
library. The articles found were categorized using the same criteria mentioned above and the
full text of these sources was retrieved for detailed review. The final list of selected sources was
considered complete after each category contained at least five articles and it was checked that
at least two-thirds of all sources came from a peer-reviewed journal. Upon full text examination
of the articles chosen, sources not designated as part of the case study or HRM practices
category underwent additional differentiation to determine where in the literature review the
article would be referenced.
The approach was taken in order to determine the exact scope of the topic and to find
prior data and research on what steps had already been taken to solve the problem. It quickly
became apparent that there was little to no research on presenting the topic from a global
rewards perspective outside of the HR community. This spawned the conclusion that a solution
that included input from the HR community about the topic from a global rewards perspective
to the community at large would be a fresh way to approach the problem. As the solution is
the passage of federal legislation, it was important to find as much hard data as possible that
could be used to provide a reference for the gravity of the situation and the importance of the
topic as a whole.

11. Mahony-8
Literature Review
To present an appropriate solution to the problem of the United States’ lack of a
statutory maternity leave entitlement, review of previous research on multiple facets of the
topic is presented in the literature review below. First, to establish a baseline or average paid
maternity leave offering for ILO, OECD, and G7 countries, a standard definition of the leave
must be adopted. This capstone will use the definition endorsed by the OECD, which designates
maternity leave as an “employment-protected leave of absence for employed women at
around the time of childbirth, or adoption in some countries” (OECD 2016b, under “Definitions
and Methodology”). Upon deciding this, it is now important to determine why the lack of a
statutory paid maternity leave entitlement in the United States is a problem. The root of the
problem appears to stem from the country’s conception of employment and the employee’s
relationship to the market as a whole.
In a 2013 study of the statutory leave entitlements of developed countries, Richard
Block and colleagues (2013, 127) used Block’s (2007) previously established methodology for
measuring the adequacy of labor standards. Block and colleagues (2013, 139) posit that the
United States’ core presumption that, “markets work, there is competition, and that all
economic actors have equal market power,” fuels the belief that employees and employers
have an equal say in the employment relationship. This view presumes that the government
does not need to get too heavily involved in the employer/employee relationship, because due
to their (presumed) equal status, employees have the ability to demand what they need.
Unfortunately, the assumption that markets function efficiently by themselves, giving all
economic actors equal power is incorrect - it is the employer who sets the conditions and price

12. Mahony-9
of labor. The product of this false assumption is, “the resulting conception of employment as a
transaction…in the context of employer pricing and the absence of regulation” (Block, Park, and
Kang 2013, 140). Company-dictated pricing combined with the country’s perception that the
market works without governance and all parties in the employment relationship are equal
results in a labor market without the statutory leave entitlements that citizens of other
countries receive (Block, Park and Kang 2013, 140). The United States’ core beliefs about the
labor market allow a hands-off approach when it comes to employee benefits.
Statutory Paid Maternity Leave around the World
Understanding the ideas influencing the United States’ view of the labor market makes
their lack of a statutory maternity leave entitlement easier to comprehend. However, the
practice is still concerning when compared to the offerings of the other 186 OECD member
countries (OECD 2016a). Regarding overall paid leave available to mothers, the OECD average is
54.1 weeks, while the average for developed countries is 38.8 weeks (OECD 2016b). The OECD
average payment rate for the length of the statutory entitlement is 74% of earnings, while
developed countries offer an average of 65.4% (OECD 2016b). When compared to other OECD
members, the country’s continued lack of the statutory entitlement becomes even more
concerning.
As the majority of OECD members lack the global or economic influence of the United
States, it is necessary to compare the paid maternity leave statutes in countries on similar or
equal footing – other members of the G7. The first figure below denotes the average amount of
weeks of paid leave for each G7 member, with the average payment rate (listed as percentage
of total earnings) noted. The second figure below denotes the amount of weeks of paid leave

13. Mahony-10
for each G7 member paid at 100% of earnings. The figures provide visual proof that the United
States is substantially behind the average of 20.28 weeks paid at an average payment rate of
70% of total earnings, or an average of 12.6 weeks paid at 100% (OECD 2016b, under “Summary
of paid leave entitlements available to mothers”, (table PF.2.1.A).
Figure 1. Total Weeks of Paid Leave (OECD 2016b, under “Summary of paid leave entitlements
available to mothers”, (table PF.2.1.A).
Figure 2. Weeks of Paid Leave Paid at 100% of Earnings (OECD 2016b, under “Summary of paid
leave entitlements available to mothers”, table PF.2.1.A)

14. Mahony-11
The numbers reflected in both figures provide validation that the United States lags
substantially when compared to its G7 counterparts.
Paid Maternity Leave in the United States
Before a federal mandate for a statutory paid maternity leave entitlement in the United
States can be enacted, it is important to determine whether or not a demand for the benefit
exists, and if instituted, if the leave will be used. In a survey of 2007 Fortune 100 firms, 88.7% of
businesses sampled reported, “offering some kind of paid leave…for the birth of a child” (Joint
Economic Committee Majority Staff 2008, 1-6). Note that all Fortune 100 firms meet the
requirements which mandate that they offer FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) unpaid leave. In
addition to the paid leave described above, unpaid FMLA leave is also an option for their
employees, and 40% of the firms sampled reported providing some paid leave alongside the
weeks of unpaid leave (Joint Economic Committee Majority Staff 2008, 1). These firms have
recognized the demand for paid maternity leave and clearly understand the business case for
offering it.
The Business Case for Paid Maternity Leave
Despite the possibility that a federal statutory paid maternity leave entitlement could be
funded through direct employee payroll contributions like the federal Social Security program,
American organizations will be quick to judge that the implementation of the benefit will cause
them undue hardship and create a financial burden (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2012, 1).
Because of this, it is important that businesses understand the positive effect that such an
entitlement could have on their bottom line. Both public and private research document the

15. Mahony-12
return on investment not only in an economic sense but regarding the organization’s ability to
attract, retain, and engage employees.
Any human resource professional knows that an organization’s ability to attract and
retain top talent is key to its success. Smart businesses have recognized that most potential
employees are looking for more than just a paycheck from their employer, leading them to
adopt a total rewards strategy when it comes to recruitment. The total rewards model includes,
“not only the transactional and relational elements of reward,” but also six key components
that create a “compelling workplace” including “work and life balance”; “inspiration and
values” and “enabling environment” (Schlecter, Faught, and Bussin 2014, under “Employee
retention (total rewards model)”). A paid maternity leave benefit can help fulfill three of these
– work life balance, inspiration and values, and an enabling environment.
A large body of research highlights that total rewards compensation “practices can
benefit employers by improving their ability to recruit and retain talent, lowering costly worker
turnover and minimizing loss of firm-specific skills and human capital” (The Council of Economic
Advisers 2014a, 17). The Council of Economic Advisers (2014b, 14) posits that the
implementation of all types of paid leave programs, “can potentially pay for themselves if they
help a company reduce turnover or increase recruitment.” Research by the Joint Economic
Committee (2008, 4) reinforces this, finding that “paid leave is a better retention policy that
unpaid leave because the probability of returning to the same employer after having a child is
5.4 percentage points greater for women who received paid maternity leave." Organizations
must ensure that they do not disregard the potential gains of a paid maternity leave policy
simply due to the upfront costs.

16. Mahony-13
Organizations are also quick to overlook the potential recruitment of individuals who
are not currently in the labor market due to a lack of family-friendly policies. According to the
Council of Economic Advisers (2014a, 5), “about half of prime-aged women (age 25-54) were in
the workforce in 1970...three-quarters were in…by the early 1990s” but that, “since the 1990s,
female participation... has stalled.” The implementation of a statutory paid maternity leave
entitlement has the potential to jumpstart the instance of females in the workforce, as there is
growing "evidence that having access to maternity leave increases the likelihood that mothers
return to work and continue progressing in their careers” (The Council of Economic Advisers
2014a, 7). The implementation of such leave is a necessity if organizations want an increase of
prime-aged women in the labor market.
Perhaps even more concerning regarding potential costs is the considerable financial
damage that losing an employee can have on the business. Research from 2014 found that
“employee replacement costs range from 10-30% of annual salary for low and moderate
income positions up to 100-200% of annual salary for some higher-income professionals” (The
Council of Economic Advisers 2014b, 14). Fortunately, the benefit of paid maternity leave can
help employers avoid these costs altogether. For females, the likelihood of returning to work
with the same employer in the 9-12 months postpartum is, “76.6% if she takes paid leave,”
compared to only 63% with no leave benefit (Houser and Vartanian 2012, 7). Another study
puts the numbers even higher, with, “more than 95%," of those who took paid leave returning,
“to work at the end of the leave period, and more than four-fifths,” returning, “to the same
employer they had worked for prior to the leave” (Appelbaum and Milkman 2011, 25). Astute

17. Mahony-14
employers understand that the upfront cost of implementing programs to retain current
employees far outweighs the costs of finding and training their replacements.
Some of this ability to recruit and retain talent is attributed to the message the
organization sends to potential and current employees, who perceive the instance of these
programs as a measure of, “organizational support” (Muhammad, Metz, and Kulik 2015, 556).
This message is critical and has actual cost implications, as it is not only heard by potential and
current employees but the public as well. In a study tracking the stock price of Fortune 500
organizations after the announcement of new work-life programs, firms saw a price increase of
.36 percent in the days following the statement (The Council of Economic Advisers 2014b, 23).
Despite the perceived increase in the cost for employers of the benefit implementation, actual
research confirms that the costs of not doing so are much greater.
Paid Maternity Leave and Maternal and Child Well-Being
The debate about paid maternity leave is usually a discussion of the costs to employers
weighed against the benefits for employees. However, it is important to include discourse
about the potential benefits of the entitlement on maternal and child well-being, as these
effects have implications for greater society as a whole. Judith Galtry (2002, 273), a primary
researcher in the field of infant well-being, feels strongly that U.S. policy should be reassessed,
“with regard to the extent which [it] support[s] infant health.” As today’s children are
tomorrow’s workforce, their health and welfare in the present can have a huge effect on the
robustness of the labor market in the future.
From the perspective of infant health, perhaps nothing is more important than ensuring
that the newborn has adequate time to be breastfed. Judith Galtry (2002, 259) reviews multiple

18. Mahony-15
global epidemiological studies and declares that there is substantial evidence, “that
breastfeeding decreases the incidents and/or severity of dirrhoea (sic), lower respiratory tract
infection… bacterial meningitis,” and a host of other illnesses. Also, she notes that
“breastfeeding confers health benefits on mothers” (Galtry 2002, 259). Unfortunately, among
industrialized countries, “the USA has one of the lowest breastfeeding rates,” despite
numerous recommendations from medical bodies, “for 6 months’ exclusive breastfeeding”
(Galtry 2002, 268-271). Galtry (2002, 260) surmises that this is because, “for many women
‘competition clearly exists between work and breastfeeding’, it is breastfeeding that is
sacrificed given that it represents the more flexible constraint.” Despite the laws and
regulations protecting women’s right to breastfeed while at work, if paid maternity leave were
offered, women might not have to make the choice between work and breastfeeding quite so
soon.
In addition, for the majority of women, the only option for childcare upon returning
work is a group setting. Unfortunately, “infants and children are at greater risk of infectious
disease in the first few months of commencing day care,” and there is an additional, “increased
risk of repeated infection” (Galtry 2002, 262). However, for women without paid maternity
leave, the option to keep a child out of daycare is non-existent. A federally mandated statutory
leave entitlement will help ensure that every mother has a choice.
Paid Maternity Leave and Work-Life Balance
From a total rewards perspective, policies that promote work-life balance are
increasingly being used to show employees that the organization values their diverse family
situations. Even the United States government understands that “children are increasingly

19. Mahony-16
raised in households in which all parents work in the labor market” (The Council of Economic
Advisers 2014b, 5). Despite this increase, only 40% of female workers in the United States
report access to a paid maternity leave benefit (The Council of Economic Advisers 2014b, 14).
This may be attributed to the fact that some workers may not be aware of such policies, or are
unwilling to ask to use the benefit due to the fear of retaliation (The Council of Economic
Advisers 2014b, 14).This lack of benefit is unfortunate, as the returns the employer sees from
offering such paid leave are much greater than the upfront costs.
The Council of Economic Advisers reports that “workers with more flexible
arrangements report higher levels of job satisfaction, more loyalty and commitment to their
employers, and “high likelihood[s]” of remaining with their employers for the following year”
(The Council of Economic Advisers 2014b, 19). The Council (2014b, 21) points to the increasing
amount of data demonstrating the link between job stress and poor health, which eventually
results in a loss of productivity and increased absenteeism. A smart organization understands
that the initial cost of offering benefits that allow for flexible work schedules will ultimately be
minimal compared to the gains from healthy and productive employees.
Paid Maternity Leave and the Disparate Impact of FMLA
Conceivably, the number one reason the United States is so hesitant to implement a
statutory maternity leave entitlement is the existence of the FMLA. Unfortunately, a multitude
of research demonstrates that “FMLA has not done enough for leave-taking, especially for
economically vulnerable families” (Houser and Vartanian 2012, 4). While it is helpful that the
FMLA allows for leave, because many workers cannot afford to go that long without pay or

20. Mahony-17
work for organizations who are exempt, they are simply unable to take advantage of the
benefit.
From a cost perspective, a statutory paid leave entitlement funded directly from worker
contributions might ultimately be less costly to the government than only relying on FMLA.
Data from a 2000 survey on leave-taking habits reported that “almost one-tenth of workers
using unpaid FMLA leave after the birth of a child used public assistance during their leave” and
that “women who take paid leave are 39% less likely…to report public assistance receipt in the
year following the child’s birth” (Houser and Vartanian 2012, 8). Use of public assistance could
be attributed to The Council of Economic Advisers (2014a, 12) findings that, “the most
pronounced disparities in access to paid leave exist across education and wage levels.” If the
United States chooses to pay attention to these disparities, the economy may benefit in the
form of reduced dependence on public assistance.
A 2011 evaluation of California’s Paid Family Leave (PFL) program further confirms the
disparate impact of FMLA and additional paid leave benefits on women in lower-wage jobs with
less stringent educational hiring requirements. The research found that, “93.5 percent [of]
respondents with high-quality jobs,” (paying $20 or more per hour with health benefits), “had
access to employer-provided paid sick days and/or paid vacation, compared to only 62.1
percent of those with low-quality jobs” (Appelbaum and Milkman 2011, 11). Although many
employers without specific paid maternity leave policies allow employees to use a combination
of other types of paid leave for the birth of a child, those in low-wage jobs seldom have access
to such benefits.

21. Mahony-18
Data further confirms that workers in low-wage jobs are more likely to be minorities
with no access to paid leave. The Council of Economic Advisers (2014a, 12) found that “only 43
percent of Hispanics,” have access, “to paid leave in comparison to 61 percent of non-
Hispanics.” The Council (2014a, 12) confirms that for minorities, “total compensation
inequality” (here, total compensation refers to the total rewards package), “is greater than
inequality implied by take-home pay.” Therefore, the FMLA, does not provide the same
protection for all U.S. workers.
However, a statutory paid maternity leave entitlement could help to remedy this
inequality. Appelbaum and Milkman describe California’s PFL as, “a potential social leveler that
could narrow or perhaps even close the gap in access to paid leave between the “haves” and
“have-nots”” by making a promise to California’s workforce to, “provide access to paid leave to
workers who have no other means of obtaining it, especially low-wage workers” (Appelbaum
and Milkman 2011, 11-12). A federal statutory paid maternity leave entitlement would make
this promise to all the females in the workforce, providing for actual equality in coverage
regardless of race, job type or education level.
The literature review makes it increasingly clear the United States’ perception of the
labor relationship affects their view on federal policies that provide protection for employees.
With little regard for how their country’s females employees are treated when compared to the
rest of the world, the United States continues to presume that the requirements of the FMLA
are enough to protect the health and well-being of working mothers and their newborns.
However, the research clearly disputes this.

22. Mahony-19
Solution
The literature review provides a vast amount of evidence as to why the implementation
of a statutory paid maternity leave entitlement would be beneficial not only to female working
citizens of the United States, but also to businesses and the economy as well. From the
perspective of the current U.S. economy, a workforce with increased participation of women
and full of engaged employees is ideal. From the perspective of the U.S. economy of the future,
a workforce full of hearty individuals who were raised in the healthiest manner possible during
infancy presents the greatest possible chance for continued success. Also, data from the
literature review collected from both the OECD and the G7 highlights how aberrant the United
States’ lack of a statutory entitlement is in the current global economy. It is time for the United
States join the rest of the world’s developed economies by implementing a mandatory benefit
through the creation of federal legislation. The federal legislation must include provisions for
funding, as an unfunded mandate will not solve the problem.
Convincing Congress to pass a bill mandating federal paid maternity leave entitlement
will be challenging, and will require engaging the correct congressional member to introduce
legislation for recommendation to a committee. Senators who are members of the
Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety in the Senate Committee on Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions will have valuable contacts that they can engage for additional
support (U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions 2016, under
“Subcommittees”). House Representatives who are members of the Subcommittee on Health,
Employment, Labor and Pensions in the House Committee on Education and the Workforce will
have similar connections that may have additional resources to aid in passing the legislation

23. Mahony-20
(Education and the Workforce Committee 2016, under “Members, Subcommittees &
Jurisdictions”). The congressional member who introduces the legislation should make sure to
provide a comparison between the U.S. and other G7 members when making the introduction,
as this will demonstrate the necessity of bill.
To gain support from the professional field for the legislation, this capstone also
proposes tapping the Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) for help in the form of
an official public policy statement issued by their Board of Directors. In order to have SHRM’s
Board of Directors create an official public policy statement, the capstone and any necessary
supporting materials will be submitted to SHRM’s call for proposals for their annual conference.
If selected, a presentation will be made to conference attendees, with a solicitation at the end
of the presentation for members to notify the SHRM Government Affairs Committee. The
Committee will then petition the Board of Directors to create the statement to be distributed to
congressional members through the proper channels. The information included in the public
policy statement can be utilized by the congressional member who introduces the bill as
validation that there is support from the professional field for federal implementation.
Should SHRM be unable or refuse to participate in assisting with implementation of
legislation, the Fortune 100 businesses surveyed by the Joint Economic Committee Staff
referenced previously should be called upon for assistance. These businesses can engage their
industry lobbyists to contact the congressional members they work with to ensure support for
the legislation once it is introduced. The organizations should be provided with the same
information as SHRM so that the lobbyists will have all available resources when they engage
their congressional contacts. This information can be utilized by any congressional member for

24. Mahony-21
validation that there is support from leading businesses and their industries for federal
implementation.
Discussion
The proposed solution of an implementation of a federally mandated paid maternity
leave entitlement was chosen out of necessity. There is simply no other way to ensure that
every working female citizen, regardless of education level, job type or minority status will
receive the benefit. The proven disparate impact of the FMLA attests to that. The
implementation in either part of the legislative branch provides a greater chance to garner
support for the issue, which will increase the likelihood the legislation being passed. By utilizing
SHRM’s Capitol Hill channels to distribute their official public policy statement, there is a much
greater possibility for potential discussion and action by congressional members. And by having
the contingency plan of engaging Fortune 100 businesses for support should SHRM decide not
to participate, there is even greater possibility of passage of the legislation.
Strengths
Passage of a statutory paid maternity leave entitlement at the federal level is the
ultimate solution and endgame – it solves the problem once and for all. It is important to note
that the passage of legislation must come at the federal level and not be left to the discretion of
individual states, as is currently the case. Although some states, like Washington and California,
have been successful at passing legislation, implementation remains an issue. In California, the
Paid Family Leave program was implemented, but many employees are unaware that the
program exists (Appelbaum and Milkman 2011, 14). In Washington, legislation was passed but
the program has not been implemented due to lack of funding (Appelbaum and Milkman 2011,

25. Mahony-22
3). The solution of implementation at a federal level will help to avoid pitfalls that the state
implemented programs discovered and ensure that the new legislation does not have a
disparate impact like FMLA.
Utilizing SHRM for assistance with implementation of legislation demonstrates the
support of the entire professional field. Support from the field is extremely important, as it will
be those individuals charged with administering the specifics of the legislation upon
implementation. As SHRM is the largest professional human resources society in the world,
their influence cannot be understated (SHRM 2016c, under “Vision, Mission & History”).
SHRM’s public support for pending legislation has a demonstrated effect on the likelihood of
that legislation passing. For example, their position statements on the ADA Amendments Act of
2008 and the Overtime Reform and Enhancement Act of 2016 provided much-needed
professional backing which assisted in the passing of both bills (SHRM2016d, under “HR Public
Policy Issues”). The aid of the professional field, demonstrated through SHRM’s public policy
statement, will undoubtedly help the legislation to pass.
Finally, having the contingency strategy of engaging the executives of Fortune 100
companies should SHRM decide not to participate ensures that the bill will have support
outside of the legislative branch in any scenario. As the largest corporations in the country,
these organizations are often seen as a “model” of “basic employment standard[s] for all
workers in the United States” (Joint Economic Committee Majority Staff 2008, 15). This status
affords this group of organizations considerable influence over regulations that will affect
workers. In addition, these organizations represent a multitude of industries, including those
with a large lobbying presence, which can be used to create additional influence. Having a

26. Mahony-23
supplementary source of outside support for legislation creates additional insurance that the
proposed bill will be passed.
Weaknesses
It is important to note that the steps within the solution contain weaknesses. After
hearing the presentation, Congress may fail to act on the bill, essentially killing it before it is
sent to committee. Even if the legislation is brought to Committee, the Committee itself may
decide that it is not worth voting on. And even if bill is voted on, it may not pass. There have
been 5 different bills that have included some type of paid family leave entitlement introduced
in Congress since 2005, and the legislation still does not exist (Joint Economic Committee
Majority Staff 2008, 14). Unfortunately, this is a track record that may be hard to change.
Also, despite the multitude of research that speaks to the advantages for business that a
paid maternity leave benefit can have, there are still business that report little to no positive
effects upon implementation. In their 2011 study of California’s Paid Family Leave program,
Appelbaum and Milkman (2011, 14) saw numerous responses from business that the benefit
had, “no noticeable effect on productivity…profitability/performance…turnover…and employee
morale.” Such reports from businesses that have implemented the benefit due to mandate
provide a powerful contradiction to the large amount of data of organizations that have
implemented the benefit by choice.
Finally, it is important to note that while a lack of a statutory paid maternity leave
entitlement does go against the United States’ membership pledge in both the OECD and the
G7, they still remain members. Neither organization states anywhere that refusal to implement

27. Mahony-24
an agreement or convention will result in a loss of membership. Ultimately, this means the
United States faces virtually no consequences from either organization for their failure to act.
Here, the persistent perception of business leaders of the enormous cost of implementation
combined with the fact that the U.S. is still a member of both the OECD and the G7 regardless
of their decision not to enact an entitlement may convince legislators that legislation will not
make it past floor action. Clearly, the introduction of legislation to Congress is only a starting
step on a giant ladder.
Opportunities
The creation of legislation provides ample opportunities for input and more research.
First, the addition of research about the potential cost for implementation, either through
direct employee contributions or on the part of employers would help to determine the
viability of enacting potential legislation. It would be well worth it for specific research to be
conducted on the state of Washington, as the state has implemented a paid leave policy similar
to California but has been unable to fund it. Research to determine why and how that
happened would be helpful to prevent future pitfalls should legislation eventually be enacted.
In addition, additional research could be conducted on the successful implementation of the
federal Social Security and Medicare programs to see how they were realized and how that
information can be utilized to make implementation more seamless.
SHRM members could offer input as to whether the statutory legislation should be
maternity-specific or if it should fall under a general family leave policy. Also, they may be able
to provide valuable lessons learned should they work for an organization that has implemented
any type of paid family leave policy on its own like instances of employee lack of use or abuse of

28. Mahony-25
the entitlement and how the benefit is administered and tracked. This information would be
extremely helpful as businesses will certainly have questions about these issues should
legislation be implemented. Tapping in to the professional field’s insight and knowledge will
provide added resources for congressional members as the specifics of the legislation are being
fleshed out.
Threats
Unfortunately, there are obvious threats that may potentially jeopardize the passing of
legislation. Even if a bill is eventually created and put up for a vote, there is a significant
possibility that it may not pass. Such was the case with two bills about paid leave created in
2013, H.R. 517 – Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act and S. 1810 – Family and Medical
Insurance Leave Act, both of which were referred to committees for further debate and have
since been all but forgotten (congress.gov 2016a; congress.gov 2016b). Congress may point out
that no new legislation is needed due to the existence of FMLA, despite the disparate impact
that legislation has on working females throughout the country.
In addition, depending on the legislation, the entitlement could be paid for in the same
manner as Social Security or Medicare, meaning that there will be a cost to employers, who in
2012 paid an average of $2.33 per employee hour worked (8.1% of total employee
compensation) for these benefits (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2012, 1). Employers will be
quick to contact their congressional allies to lobby against this, despite the overall evidence of
the benefit on other aspects of the organization. Such was the case in the instance of the
legislation to increase minimum wage in 2014 (Liberto 2014). Despite support from 76% of
Americans, the National Retail Federation, “spent $1 million in the first three months of the

29. Mahony-26
year lobbying Congress on minimum wage,” (Dugan 2013, under “Tying minimum-wage
increases to inflation is slightly less popular”; Liberto 2014, under “Business are pulling out all
the stops to fight a federal wage increase to $10.10 from $7.25 an hour”). As for-profit
organizations in the past have put forth a nearly un-ending supply of funds to fight legislation
that may impose an unwanted cost, the potential threat of lobbyists may mean the end for the
legislation.
Trends
Despite the obvious threats, there are some very positive trends within the human
resources field that speak to the viability of overall support for a paid maternity leave benefit in
the United States. SHRM’s 2016 report on the state of employee benefits discloses that 26% of
organizations surveyed are offering a stand-alone paid maternity leave benefit and that a
majority of businesses (83%) with a family leave plan include paid maternity leave (SHRM
2016a, 3). Employees at the organizations offering these benefits are taking advantage, with
63% who offer paid leave reporting that their female employees had used all available paid
leave to care for a new child (SHRM 2016a, 3). These trends provide validity to the position that
employees seek employers who offer programs promoting work-life flexibility and speak to the
fact that businesses are beginning to listen to their employees and offer such arrangements.
Recommendations
This capstone has made an initial step in what will undoubtedly be a challenging path
towards the passage of a federal statutory maternity leave entitlement. First, further research
must be conducted about addition viable ways to ensure that the introduced legislation is
ultimately passed, such as identification of key congressional allies or lobbyists who can provide

30. Mahony-27
support. Aside from the Society of Human Resources Management, executives from well-
known businesses within influential industries, such as energy or technology could be engaged.
Those industries will have lobbyists working on their behalf who could provide additional
endorsement. It will be important to amass as much support as possible for the potential
legislation from the business sector, especially if any funding must come from businesses
themselves. This show of support will demonstrate to congress that organizations are willing to
take on the cost of legislation in order to establish that their worker’s needs are met.
To garner as much support as possible for the topic from the professional human
resources community, additional education may need to be provided directly to the SHRM
Government Affairs Committee as they will need to provide clarification to the Board when the
statement is being created to ensure that it includes verbiage to include every female working
citizen. As congressional members will undoubtedly turn to the professional field for assistance
in crafting the proposed legislation, this additional preparation will ensure that the bill that is
passed covers all potential loopholes and considers every stakeholder.
Finally, it would be wise the congressional members introducing the bill to partner with
prominent advocates in women and children’s health or worker rights to increase support for
the issue. These leaders may have additional ideas about funding, and can provide expertise
about previous legislation their fields assisted in getting passed. In order to ensure the passage
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, which included an allotment of time
on the job for breastfeeding, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a public policy
statement outlining the benefits of breastfeeding and recommendations for breastfeeding
healthy infants (US Department of Labor 2016, under “Break Time for Nursing Mothers”;

31. Mahony-28
American Academy of Pediatrics 2012, 1). By engaging leaders in multiple spheres of influence,
Congress will be more easily convinced of the importance of the paid maternity leave
legislation.
Conclusion
The lack of a statutory paid maternity leave entitlement in the United States puts the
country’s reputation as a global economic and labor leader in jeopardy. If the United States
does not fulfill its membership obligations in the G7 and the OECD, then the country should not
enact any economic or trade restrictions against other members who do not fulfill their
membership obligations. Now the common goals of the organizations seem voluntary at best,
which ultimately negates the reason for having them in the first place.
The implementation of a statutory paid maternity leave entitlement on a federal level in
the United States will have a huge impact on its female working citizens. No longer subject to
the disparate impact of FMLA, all female workers can expect improvement in their children’s
and their own physical and mental well-being, as well as a work environment that is more
accepting of the demands of outside life. Businesses can expect an increase of available female
job candidates, a decrease in female employee turnover and a happier, more engaged
employee population. The United States will show the world its renewed commitment to a
viable robust workforce, as happy and healthy workers who are equipped with the means to
balance all aspects of their lives will only serve to benefit the economy within the global
marketplace. The implementation of this entitlement is a smart business move on the part of
employers, and will enhance the role of the United States as a leader within the global
economy.

32. Mahony-29
References
Ali, Muhammad, Isabel Metz, and Carol T. Kulik. 2015. “The Impact of Work-Family Programs on
the Relationship between Gender Diversity and Performance.” Human Resource
Management 54, no. 4 (July/August): 553-76. Accessed June 10, 2016. Wiley Online
Library.
Amah, Edwinah, Christine A. Nwuche, and Nwakaego Chukuigwe. 2013. “Effective Reward and
Incentive Scheme for Effective Organizations.” Research Journal of Finance and
Accounting 4, no.13: 73-79. Accessed June 10, 2016. International Knowledge Sharing
Platform (iiste.org).
American Academy of Pediatrics. 2012. “Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk.” Policy
Statement. Accessed July 30, 2016. www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542.peds.2011-
3552.
Appelbaum, Eileen, and Ruth Milkman. 2011. “Leaves That Pay: Employer and Worker
Experiences with Paid Family Leave in California.” Paper. The Institute for Research on
Labor and Employment, University of California Los Angeles, CA. Accessed June 10,
2016. https://escholarship.org/us.item/6bm118ss.
Baker, Michael, and Kevin Mulligan. 2008. “How does Job-Protected Maternity Leave affect
Mothers’ Employment?” Journal of Labor Economics 26, no. 4 (October): 655-91.
Accessed June 10, 2016. JSTOR.
Beblo, Miram, Stefan Bender, and Elke Wolf. 2006. “The Wage Effects of Entering motherhood:
a Within-Firm Matching Approach.” Discussion Paper. ZEW Centre for European

33. Mahony-30
Economic Research 06-053. Accessed June 15, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/
31865.
Berger, Noah, and Peter Fisher. 2013. “A Well-Educated Workforce Is Key to State Prosperity.”
Economic Policy Institute. Report, June 22. Accessed June 28, 2016. www.epi.org/
publication/states-education-productivity-growth-foundations/.
Block, Richard N. 2007. “Indicators of Labour Standards: An Overview and Comparison.” In
Qualitative Indicators of Labour Standards: Comparative Methods and Applications,
edited by David Kucera, 27-56. Dordrecht: Springer.
Block, Richard N., Joo-Youn Park, and Young-Hee Kang. 2013. “Statutory Leave Entitlements
Across Developed Countries: Why US Workers Lose Out on Work-Family Balance.”
International Labour Review 152, no. 1 (March): 125-43. Accessed June 16, 2016. Wiley
Online Library.
Congress.gov. 2016a. “H.R. 517 – Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act of 2013.” Accessed
July 11, 2016. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/517/all-
actions?overview=closed#tabs.
Congress.gov. 2016b. “S.1810 Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act of 2013.” Accessed July
11, 2016. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/1810.
Council on Foreign Relations. 2015. CFR Backgrounders: The Group of Seven (G7), June 2, by
Zachary Laub, and James McBride. Accessed June 27, 2016. http://www.cfr.org
/international-organizations-and-alliances/group-seven-g7/p32957.

34. Mahony-31
Dugan, Andrew. “Most Americans for Raising Minimum Wage.” Gallup. November 11. Accessed
July 29, 2016. http://www.gallup.com/poll/165794/americans-raising-minimum-
wage.aspx.
Education and the Workforce Committee. 2016. “Members, Subcommittees & Jurisdictions.”
Accessed July 29, 2016. http://edworkforce.house.gov/committee/subcommittees
jurisdictions.htm.
Espinola-Arredondo, Ana, and Sunita Mondal. 2008. “The Effect of Parental Leave on Female
Employment: Evidence from State Policies.” Working Paper. Washington State
University School of Economic Sciences 2008-15. Accessed June 15, 2016.
http://faculty.ses.wsu.edu/WorkingPapers/AnaEspinola/FMLA_MAY2010.pdf.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. “Statutes: The Equal Pay Act of 1963.” Accessed
June 24, 2016. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/epa.cfm.
Galtry, Judith. 2002. “Child Health: An Underplayed Variable in Parental Leave Policy Debates?”
Community, Work & Family 5, no. 3: 257-78. Accessed June 16, 2016. Taylor & Francis
Online.
Galtry, Judith, and Paul Callister. 2005. “Assessing the Optimal Length of Parental Leave for
Child and Parental Well-being: How Can Research Inform Policy?” Journal of Family
Issues 26, no. 2: 219-46. Accessed June 16, 2016. http://jfi.sagepub.com/content/
26/2/219.full.pdf.
Group of Seven. 2015. G-7 Leader’s Declaration. White House Press Release, June 8, 2015.
Accessed June 10, 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/06/08/g-
7-leaders-declaration.

35. Mahony-32
Han, Wen-Jui, Christopher Ruhm, and Jane Waldfogel. “Parental Leave Policies and Parents’
Employment and Leave-Taking.” 2009. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28,
no. 1 (Winter): 29-54. Accessed June 15, 2016. Wiley Online Library.
Han, Wen-Jui, Christopher Ruhm, Jane Waldfogel, and Elizabeth Washbrook. 2009. “Public
Policies and Women’s Employment after Childbearing.” Working Paper 14660. National
Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed June 16, 2016. http://www.nber.org/papers/
w14660.pdf.
Han, Wen-Jui, Jane Waldfogel, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. 2001. “The Effects of Early Maternal
Employment on Later Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes.” Journal of Marriage and
Family 63, no. 2 (May): 336-54. Accessed June 21, 2016. Wiley Online Library.
Houser, Linda, and Thomas P. Vartanian. 2012. “Pay Matters: The Positive Economic Impacts of
Paid Family Leave for Families, Businesses and the Public.” Report. The Center for
Women and Work, Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations: NJ. Accessed
June 10, 2016. http://smlr.rutgers.edu/paymatters-cwwreport-january2012.
International Labour Organization. 2016a. “About the ILO.” Accessed June 26, 2016.
http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/lang--en/index.htm.
International Labour Organization. 2016b. “ILO and the United States: Brief History and
Timeline.” Accessed June 27, 2016. http://www.ilo.org/washington/ilo-and-the-united-
states/brief-history-and-timeline/lang--en/index.htm.
International Labour Organization. 2016c. “Conventions and Recommendations: Fundamental
Conventions.” List. Accessed June 24, 2016. http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/

36. Mahony-33
introduction-to-international-labour-standards/conventions-and-recommendations/
lang—en/index.htm.
International Labour Organization. 2014. “Maternity and Paternity at Work: Law and Practice
across the World.” Policy Brief. May 13: 1-15. Accessed June 10, 2016. http://www.ilo.
org/ wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_242
617.pdf.
International Labour Organization and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development. “Memorandum of Understanding.” Memorandum. May 23, 2011: 1-5.
Accessed June 24, 2016. https://www.oecd.org/globalrelations/48013743.pdf.
Joint Economic Committee Majority Staff. “Paid Family Leave at Fortune 100 Companies: A
Basic Standard but Still Not the Gold Standard.” Report. March 2008. Senator Schumer
of New York, Chairman and Representative Maloney of New York, Vice Chairman.
Accessed June 10, 2016. http://www.jec.senate.gov/archive/Documents/Reports/
03.05.08PaidFamilyLeave.pdf.
Kar, Subhasree, and K. C. Misra. 2013. “Nexus between Work Life Balance Practices and
Employee Retention – The Mediating Effect of a Supportive Culture.” Asian Social
Science 9, no. 11 (September): 63-69. Accessed June 10, 2016. http://www.ccsenet.org/
journal/index.php/ ass/article/view/30030/17787.
Liberto, Jennifer. “Companies Ramp Up Fight Against $10.10 Wage.” CNN. May 6. Accessed July
29, 2016. http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/06/news/economy/companies-against-
minimum-wage/.

37. Mahony-34
Library of Congress. “Primary Documents in American History: 13th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.” Accessed June 24, 2016. https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/
13thamendment.html.
Livingston, Gretchen. 2013. “Among 38 Nations, U.S. is the Outlier When it Comes to Paid
Parental Leave.” Pew Research Center, December 12, 2013. Accessed June 10, 2016.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/12/12/among-38-nations-u-s-is-the-
holdout-when-it-comes-to-offering-paid-parental-leave/.
National Archives. “Teaching with Documents: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission.” Accessed June 24, 2016. https://www.archives.
gov/education/lessons/civil-rights-act/.
National Labor Relations Board. “Resources: National Labor Relations Act.” Accessed June 24,
2016. https://www.nlrb.gov/resources/national-labor-relations-act.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016a. “History.” Accessed June 27,
2016. http://www.oecd.org/about/history/.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. “OCED 50th Anniversary
Vision Statement.” Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, May 26,
2011: 1-4. Accessed June 10, 2016. http://www/oecd.org/mcm/48064973.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Social Policy Division, Directorate of
Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. 2016b. “Paid Parental Leave Systems.”
Document. Updated February 28, 2016. Accessed June 10, 2016. http://www.oecd.org/
els/soc/ PF2_1_Parental_ leave_systems.pdf.

38. Mahony-35
Shepard-Banigan, Megan, and Janice F. Bell. 2014. “Paid Leave Benefits among a National
Sample of Working Mothers with Infants in the United States.” Maternal and Child
Health Journal 18, no. 1 (January): 286-95. Accessed June 16, 2016. DU Summon.
Schlecter, Anton, Charl Faught, and Mark Bussin. 2014. “Total Rewards: A Study of Artisan
Attraction and Retention within a South African Context.” SA Journal of Human Resource
Management 12, no. 1. Accessed June 10, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/
sajhrm.v12i1.648.
Society for Human Resource Management. 2016a. “2016 Employee Benefits: Looking Back at 20
Years of Employee Benefits Offerings in the US.” Research report, “Overview of Paid
Leave Benefits” section. June 20: 1-5. Accessed July 11, 2016. https://www.shrm.org.
Society for Human Resource Management. 2016b. “Issues and Position Statements.” Accessed
June 10, 2016. https://www.shrm.org/advocacy/issues/pages/default.aspx.
Society for Human Resource Management. 2016c. “Vision, Mission & History.” Accessed July
27, 2016. https://www.shrm.org/about-shrm/pages/default.aspx.
Society for Human Resource Management. 2016d. “HR & Public Policy Issues.” Accessed July
29, 2016. https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/public-policy/hr-public-policy-
issues/pages/default.aspx.
The Council of Economic Advisers. “The Economics of Paid and Unpaid Leave.” Report. June
2014a. Accessed June 10, 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/
leave _report_final.pdf.

39. Mahony-36
The Council of Economic Advisers. “Work-Life Balance and the Economics of Workplace
Flexibility. Report. June 2014b. Accessed June 10, 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/
sites/ default/files/docs/updated_workplace_flex_report_final_0.pdf.
Thévenon, Olivier, and Anne Solaz. 2013. “Labour Market Effects of Parental Leave Policies in
OECD Countries.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 141.
OECD Publishing. Accessed June 10, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k8xb6hw1wjf-en.
Tremblay, Diane-Gabrielle. 2010. “Paid Parental Leave: An Employee Right or Still an Ideal? An
Analysis of the Situation in Québec in Comparison with North America.” Employee
Responsibilities and Rights Journal 22, no. 2 (June): 83-100. Accessed June 16, 2016. DU
Summon.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012. “Program Perspectives.” National Compensation Survey
Benefit Series 4 no. 1 (April): 1-4. Accessed June 10, 2016. http://www.bls.gov/opub/
btn/archive/program-perspectives-on-legally-required-benefit-costs-pdf.
U.S. Department of Labor. 2016. “Break Time for Nursing Mothers.” Accessed July 30, 2016.
https://www.dol.gov/whd/nursingmothers/.
U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. 2016. “Subcommittees.”
Accessed July 29, 2016. http://www.help.senate.gov/about/subcommittees.
Whitehouse, Gillian, Belinda Hewitt, Bill Martin, and Marian Baird. 2013. “Employer-paid
Maternity Leave in Australia: A Comparison of Uptake and Duration in 2005 and 2010.”
Australian Journal of Labour Economics 16, no. 3: 311-27. Accessed June 10, 2016.
ProQuest.