Más contenido relacionado La actualidad más candente (20) Similar a Improving Sales Force Performance and Effectiveness (20) Más de L.E.K. Consulting (20) Improving Sales Force Performance and Effectiveness1. Bangkok
Beijing
Boston
Chennai
Chicago
London
Los Angeles
Improving Sales Force Performance
Melbourne
November 21, 2013
Mumbai
Milan
Munich
New Delhi
New York
The materials contained in this document are intended to supplement a
discussion between Chief Executive Network and L.E.K. Consulting on
November 21, 2013. These perspectives are confidential and will only
be meaningful to those in attendance.
Paris
São Paolo
San Francisco
Seoul
Shanghai
Singapore
L.E.K. Consulting llc, One North Wacker Drive, 39th Floor, Chicago, IL 60606, USA
T: 312.913.6400 F: 312.782.4583 www.lek.com
Sydney
Tokyo
Wroclaw
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
2. Agenda
Agenda
Introduction to L.E.K. Consulting
Key selling effectiveness pain points
Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
Closing statements
2
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
3. Key selling effectiveness pain points
Common Sales Force Challenges:
Sales Strategy
& Channel
Alignment
Prioritization of
target markets
Difficulty in
articulating a
company’s value
proposition
New Lead
Generation
Sales
Conversion
Customer
Retention
Low sales pipeline / chasing the wrong leads
Low win rates
Internal support break downs (e.g., slow response to customers,
operational handoffs, etc.)
Customer or star sales performer defections
Poor account management – lost opportunities to grow share
Sales Force Enablers:
Sales Organization & Management
Performance Measurement
Systems & Tools
Sales Force Performance Culture
Source: CSO Insights, L.E.K. Consulting
3
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
4. Key selling effectiveness pain points
Demographics of survey respondents
n=48
Percent of respondents
100
90
Other*
Consumer Products
80
Hospitality & Food Service
HR manager /
director
>1,000
Marketing manager /
director
500-999
70
Sales manager /
director
60
50
40
100-499
Manufacturing
30
Senior executive
(e.g., VP Sales)
20
50-99
10
<50
0
Industry
Title
Number of employees
Note: *Other includes transportation, technology, healthcare, consulting & professional services and others
4
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
5. Key selling effectiveness pain points
Review of our survey results (I of III)
Selling Process
Percent of Respondents rating 6 or 7*
We clearly understand our customers’
issues before we propose a solution
44%
Sales and Marketing are aligned in
what our customers want and need
40%
We have a formalized value proposition
that is very compelling to our prospects
33%
We always review the results of our
solution with strategic accounts
29%
Our sales pipeline is clearly aligned
with our sales priorities - we are not
chasing the wrong sales opportunities
21%
0
10
20
30
40
Note: *Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1=
strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree
5
50
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
6. Key selling effectiveness pain points
Review of our survey results (II of III)
People & Organization
Percent of Respondents rating 6 or 7*
We know why our top performers are successful
48%
Our management team is highly effective in helping
our sales team advance sales opportunities
38%
Our organization is highly effective in allocating
the right resources to pursue large deals
31%
Our sales team focuses most of their time on actual
selling activity rather than non-sales activities
such as administration and customer service
21%
We leverage the best practices of our top
performers to improve everyone else
19%
0
10
20
30
Note: *Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1=
strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree
6
40
50
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
7. Key selling effectiveness pain points
Review of our survey results (III of III)
Systems & Metrics
Percent of Respondents rating 6 or 7*
Our sales compensation policies are
aligned with our business objectives
35%
Specific criteria have been established to
define a strategic account in our company
29%
Our sales management team is highly confident
in the data available from our CRM system
19%
In an average week, our sales force definitely
spends sufficient time with customers
19%
0
10
20
30
Note: *Please rate your level of agreement with each of the following statements on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1=
strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree
7
40
50
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
8. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
A holistic view of the sales function is necessary in order to identify
and capture sustainable performance improvement opportunities
1 Sales Strategy Definition
Sales Strategy &
Channel Alignment
Key Market strategy
Sales
Sales-led
Areas
growth strategy
Channel alignment
and growth strategy
2
Sales Process and Management Improvements
New Lead
Generation
Customer
Retention
Sales
Conversion
Content marketing Solution sales
& program focus
(incl. ROI/TCO)
Account
planning
Lead generation
and qualification
Proposal and
pricing
Account
maintenance
Pipeline
management &
forecasting
Negotiation and
closing
Customer upsell
Customer and
Win-back
channel value
proposition
Innovation
3 Sales
Sales Organization & Management (incl. sales ops and comp)
Force
Performance Measurement
Enablers
Systems & Tools
Sales Force Performance Culture
8
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
9. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
1
Sales Strategy Definition: Companies often face challenges
prioritizing target markets and optimizing resources to penetrate them
Common Challenges
Key Questions to Consider
Lack of understanding of target
markets, customer needs and
competitive differentiation
Can management demonstrate an in-depth
understanding of its target market segments and
how it best meets customer needs?
Opportunistic sales
How much time do Sales Reps spend on core
markets vs. opportunistic sales?
Lack of understanding of sales
drivers
Misaligned resources
Changing market dynamics that
lead to conflicts between the
company and its channel partners
Difficulty in articulating a
company’s unique selling
proposition
Can management demonstrate the ROI from sales
team investments on growth and profitability?
Do growth and Sales plans reflect this
prioritization?
Has the company’s share of key channel partners
deteriorated? Have channel partners shifted their
alliances?
How clear is the value proposition? Can sales,
channel reps and key supporting team members
clearly and consistently explain it?
9
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
10. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
It is critical to have the sales model in place that best reflects the basis
of competition and aligns with the strategy and value proposition
Highly
Differentiated
Coverage Selling Model
Needs based
Solution Selling Model
High touch selling and support
(e.g., direct sales)
High touch selling and support (e.g., mix
of direct and technical sales reps)
Unique needs based
Example: Pharmaceuticals
Highly
Commoditized
Degree of Differentiation
Sales Models: Degree of Differentiation vs. Product Complexity
Success requires ‘challenger sales’
versus relationship sales talent and focus
Low Cost Coverage Selling Model
General needs based
Mixed Coverage Selling Model
Needs based
Low touch selling and support (e.g.,
inside sales, partners, web, etc.)
Low touch selling and support (e.g.,
direct, inside sales, partners, web, etc.)
Example: MRO supplies
Example: Enterprise hardware
Little / No Customization Not Technical
High Customization Highly Technical
Product / Service Complexity
10
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
11. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
2
Sales Process and Management: Sales process and capability
breakdowns may appear isolated and minor when viewed on an
individual basis, but can have a significant aggregate impact
Common Challenges
Sales training programs fall short in
preparing sales reps to be effective in their
roles
Sales and channel reps have trouble
determining qualified leads
Informal allocation of qualified leads to sales
regions or channel partners
Key Questions to Consider
How varied is individual sales rep performance? How
varied is individual channel performance?
Are reps pursuing opportunities that are misaligned with
targeted sales?
Is there a real-time feedback loop from the Sales team
on potential customer needs?
Are sales opportunities all treated equally?
Lack of formal customer feedback
A ‘one size fits all’ process to support sales
reps complete proposals
Sales reps have limited authority to negotiate
prices
Do customers complain about Sales Reps’ inability to
make a timely decision on a request?
Is there a real-time feedback loop between Sales and
Operations on order fulfillment and delivery?
Does the Sales team know which customers and
customer segments drive sales and profits?
11
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
12. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
3
Sales Force Enablers: High performing sales teams are structured
to draw support from across the company to achieve sales goals
Common Challenges
Channel marketing, development and
management are out of alignment
Sales force structure, size and territory
coverage are out of alignment
Cross-functional links are not strong
between Sales and support functions
Performance/sales metrics and targets are
not aligned with drivers
The sales force compensation plan is
misaligned
Highlighted on the next page
Sales operations/support do not provide the
necessary leverage to the sales force
Culture does not effectively support sales
performance and promote accountability
Key Questions to Consider
Can management demonstrate the economics
associated with the sales force model and current
performance?
Do support functions view the sales function as a
‘customer’?
Do the sales performance measurement systems
provide frequent, actionable feedback?
Does the sales force compensation plan reward Sales
Reps and managers for the desired outcomes?
Can sales reps access the right information at the right
time while selling and serving customers?
Are sales rep ‘stars’ celebrated? How are laggards
supported to improve performance?
12
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
13. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
3
The overall sales force compensation plan must align to the
business strategy
Guiding Principles for Administering a
Sales Force Compensation Plan
Sales Force Compensation
Plan Design Elements
Keep the compensation plan simple; complex
plans can be interpreted differently and lead to
unwanted behaviors that were not foreseen when
the plan was designed
1
Provide the sales force with a simple tool to use to
calculate their anticipated compensation
2
Include sales management control provisions to
adjust for windfalls, which can set unrealistic
expectations and make the sale force
uncompetitive in the long run
Include transition features in the sales force plan to
account for new salespeople, key account
changes or the launch of a new product
Make sure the data collection process and tools
are in place to facilitate timely, accurate reporting
13
Level of Pay
3
Fixed vs.
Variable
Performance
vs. Payout
4
Plan
Administration
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
14. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
In our experience, sales force effectiveness projects can quickly
accelerate sales growth and profits
Typical Benefits
Analysis and benchmarking of the sales function status quo vs. best
practices in order to gain a clear view on the current situation
Identification of specific, actionable opportunities to drive sales performance
improvements
An assessment of the potential financial gains that can be captured through
sustainable improvements in the sales function
Detailed activation plan that prioritizes ‘quick wins’ to minimize project
payback period and maximize ROI
Objective, independent perspective on the key success requirements, risks
and internal change management issues to drive successful plan execution
and benefit realization
14
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
15. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
A Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) company, was struggling
with its sales force and needed to quickly turn around its
performance to ensure its survival
Company Situation
A BPO organization was experiencing significant problems
with its sales force and its ability to generate revenue growth
and retain customers. Specific issues included:
– Declining market share
– Operationally and internally focused organization
– Mixed ability to articulate to customers its value
proposition
– Difficulty in cross-selling, up-selling, and targeted solution
selling
– Decentralized regional / country structure
The revenue growth pressures, combined with a significant
debt load, put tremendous pressure on the company to turn
around its performance quickly, but also on a long-term
sustainable basis
15
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
16. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
Major workstreams centered around the design and implementation
of necessary and dramatic changes in the company’s sales approach
and organization
Major Workstreams
Identified new opportunities to increase selling capacity without adding
resources
Set up a Sales Transformation Office that defined work streams, mobilized
teams and pushed out across the organization the right sales priorities for
the business
Designed a new sales organization that better aligned with the company’s
strategy and need to drive sustainable revenue growth
Renewed focus on growing the pipeline and improving win rates on new
business / renewals
16
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
17. Critical levers for sales force effectiveness
The company achieved early sales wins and established the
right foundation for long-term sales performance improvement
Results
Benefits included:
– Increased senior management’s focus on the sales force and generating
revenue growth
– Grew the sales pipeline and increased the win rate for both existing and new
customers
– Brought on several new hires for key sales leadership roles
– Began to turn around the culture to be much more customer centric and
sales focused
– Generated momentum to complete sales force transformation
Within three months of implementing the recommendations, the company
experienced significant, measurable sales improvements
– This included growth in the sales pipeline (up 50% y-o-y) and win rate (up
74% y-o-y)
17
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
18. Closing statements
Closing statements:
The recovery is providing
opportunities to reinvest in
sales capabilities and areas
that may have been
constrained during the
downturn
Companies should approach
sales force effectiveness
improvement as a cultural
change to reinforce sales
18
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.
19. L.E.K. Contacts
Contact information
Chris Kenney
Managing Director
T: 312.913.6409
c.kenney@lek.com
L.E.K. Consulting
One N. Wacker Drive
Suite 3900
Chicago, IL 60638
19
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2013 L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.