2. Why climate-smart decisions?
1. Climate controls 33 % of global yield variation. Up to
45 % in some areas of The Philippines (Ray et al.
2015)
2. Understanding climate variability helps produce
actionable information for farmers
3. There is enourmous demand across the tropics
4. Opportunity to do great science in many tropical
countries
5. In the long-term, these can become services for
farmers (i.e. climate services)
3. Part 1: Improving site-specific
management through
historical data analysis and
crop modelling
7. Learning from historical observations to determine
limiting factors Machine learning analysis with n=1,240
plot-level observations for irrigated rice
Data
collection
Data analysis
Insight
validation
Delerce et al. (2016)
8. Learning from historical observations to determine
limiting factors
Data
collection
Data
analysis
Insight
validation
Yet more interesting. We can determine
why some farms are underperforming
“Cluster 10”
Delerce et al. (2016)
9. (c)
(d)
(e)
(b)
(a)
R2 = 45.79 1. Good drainage and/or
higher slopes
Maize case
2. At least 25 kg/ha P
3. Mechanical harvest
4. At least 65,000
plants/ha
10. Crop simulations to guide management
recommendations
• Process-based models represent plant processes and crop systems in
high level of (mechanistic) detail
Models capture
• Responses to climate
(drought, temperature)
• Response to different N,
P and/or K levels
• Varietal differences in
responses
CIAT (unpublished data)
11. Crop simulations to guide management
recommendations
• From a set of calibrated varieties we can determine those which
consistently perform well.
• We could also determine those that do not seem to do very well
under certain events (e.g. drought)
12. What would be needed?
• Systematic data collection directly from farms
• Calibration and validation data for crop simulation model
• Clear idea of who the users are, and how information should
be “packaged”
• Historical data analysis toolkit
• Working crop simulation models
For a given site, with known climate and soil conditions, we can tell the
user what variety to plant, when to plant it, and how to manage the land
15. Systematic provision of seasonal agro-climatic
outlooks
Climate
data
QA/QC
Seasonal
forecasts
Crop models
Crop
prediction
Key
variables
Formats and
graphics
Agro-
climatic
info
Adapted from Prager et al. (2017)
16. Start with the user: Understanding user needs
37% participants reported that
“format 1” was clear yet DID
NOT produce a good
interpretation
14% participants reported
“format 1” was confusing and
consequently gave an
erroneous or incomplete
interpretation
95 participants from 6 sites:
21 farmers
70 profesionals
4 others
Muñoz and Howland (2016)
23% participants reported that
“format 3” was clear yet DID
NOT produce a good
interpretation
23% participants reported
“format 3” was confusing and
consequently gave an
erroneous or incomplete
interpretation
17. 17
Understanding user needs
What are the most critical climate-related decisions?
• Whether to sow
• When to sow?
• What to sow?
18. Improve climate information databases
1 2 3
Llanos et al. (2016)
• Collect data
• Review methods for
gap filling and
interpolation
• Develop novel
methods where
needed
• Precipitation
• Solar radiation
19. Understanding seasonal climate predictability
• Understanding what
predictive skill we have
in different regions and
periods
• Using that knowledge
to systematically inform
on conditions for the
next 4-6 months
20. • Forecasts given as
probabilities
• Need to be ”brought
closer” to user by written
interpretation
24. • From not knowing how to manage climate variability, to having
a team of 6 people tasked with delivering agro-climatic
information
• Many of their 24,000 farmers receive monthly agro-climatic
advice
The impacts
• A team of 2 agro-climatologists running models, leading
discussion committees, and producing bulletins
• Farmers systematically receive agro-climatic advice
• Continuous funding to process and support to farmer
organisations for continued capacity strengthening
• Prediction team improved their efficiency thanks to
development of automated forecast tools
• Sub-direction of Meteorology pushes for National Framework
for Climate Services, using agriculture as lighthouse
26. 3. Crop
modelling
2. Data
driven
agronomy
1. Assess
local
information
needs
Farmer advisory
services
Connect to
seasonal and
weather forecasts
Participatory and
digital platforms
for farmer
advisory
The idea here is to say why developing decision support systems aimed at making decisions more climate-smart is important.
I divide the talk in two sections. Part 1 is about using historical records for “learning from past” and use that to improve crop management.
This slide tries to give a sense on how these insights are developed. Here, the analysis shows that cultivar is the most important variable, followed by a bunch of climatic variables.
Developing these insights is a continuous process starting from data collection, then data analysis and then validation of these insights with experts
This slide tries to give a sense on how these insights are developed. Here, the analysis shows that cultivar is the most important variable, followed by a bunch of climatic variables.
Developing these insights is a continuous process starting from data collection, then data analysis and then validation of these insights with experts
Here the idea is to give more detail about the “variety” being most important variable. Not only we are able to say that “variety” is an important factor determining productivity (this may be obvious), but also we are able to determine those farms which are underperforming and why (i.e. because having climates which are similar to other farms, they are growing varieties that do not perform well under those conditions).
This is an example with maize. Point here is that data analysis led to 5 clear-cut management recommendations.
You may know this already. If we know that the crop is constrained by nutrients, we can test in the field the performance of the crop (cassava in this case), we can simulate these responses with models, and these simulations provide the basis for decisions.
Similarly, if we knew that cultivar is a key factor, we can determine which cultivars outperform others in particular situations, and make recommendations about their use at farm level.
This should be clear. Green items indicate those we already have from previous projects elsewhere (i.e. Latin America)
This is the current thinking at CIAT on how to provide agro-climatic information to farmers. We work on “better forecasts”, “improved insights”, “institutional innovation”, and “user oriented communications (or 2-way dialogue)”. These underpin all the activities we do.
On the technical side, and if we look at this more linearly, we start from data, develop crop predictions, and then provide tailored agro-climatic info for decision making
From here on the ppt goes step by step: Step 1 is to understand users needs. We carried out workshops with farmers and technicians to understand their capacities and information needs.
This is related to the below. We found that the most important for them is:
Whether to sow
When to sow?
What varieties to sow?
Improving climate and ag. Information base
We try to understand the extent to which we can predict rainfall. The idea is that the graph shows that there is variation in Kendall correlation (which tells you how good a climate forecast is).
This is illustrating the nature of the forecast. It’s a probabilistic forecast, and we need to make sure that we translate this information well for users.
This tries to give an idea of yield variation across planting dates. If you focus on explaining the black line (mean yield across a large number of simulations) you could say that the model is allowing us to identify dates in which yield is likely low, and people shouldn’t plant their crop on those dates.
This is the agro-climatic information interface that we have developed for Colombia. It is now being used by rice and maize farmer organizations; these organisations are reaching many thousand farmers.
Finally, these are results of usability testing. Hopefully relatively easy to describe. People basically respond if they agree or not with the statement being given. Here, only 2 questions (out of 10 we asked) are shown.
This is self explanatory, hopefully. It shows project-level impacts in Colombia
A final slide showing one major project impact in 2014. We saved many rice farmers from crop failure.