 
Dr. ir. Eva Lantsoght
5/22/2020
1

 Current activities relatedto load
testing
 Overviewof load testing
researchTU Delft
 Recommendations
o Preparation of proof load tests
o Execution of proof load tests
 Summary and conclusions Slab shear experiments, TU Delft
5/22/2020 2

 New load testing standards under development
o Germany
o USA – e-circular load testing bridges (committee chair)
o USA – ACI 437 for buildings (committee member)
o USA – ACI 342 for bridges (broader scope, chapter lead for chapter
load testing)
o Netherlands: further research
o fib – bulletin existingstructures (corresponding author) + towards
new Model Code
 Conferences with MS and SS: ACI 2017, IABMAS 2018;
IALCCE 2016 + 2018, BEI 2019, fib 2017…
5/22/2020 3

5/22/2020 4

 Presentations from Chancellor Grant 2016 at IALCCE 2018
o Kevin Benitez: Development of a stop criterion for load tests based
on the critical shear displacement theory
o Eva Lantsoght: Proposed stop criteria for proof load testing of
concrete bridges and verification
o Jose Eduardo Paredes: Nonlinear finite element analysis of beam
experiments for stop criteria
o Andres Rodriguez: Verification of flexural stop criteria for proof load
tests on concrete bridges based on beam experiments
 Presentation describing current practice in Ecuador at
IALCCE 2018
o Bridge diagnostic load testing in Ecuador – case studies J. Bonifaz,
S. Zaruma, A. Robalino & T.A. Sánchez
5/22/2020 5

 September 15th 2020: Deadline for abstract submission
 Towards extending the service life of existing concrete
infrastructure through advanced assessment methods
(Special session)
5/22/2020 6

 ACI SP-323 (co-editor)
 Frontiers Built Environment–
Bridge Engineering article
collection(guest associate
editor)
 Two Books: Load Testingof
Bridges (editor) – Structures
and Infrastructuresseries
(2019)
5/22/2020 7

 E-circular
5/22/2020 8
Download link: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec257.pdf
Primary Contributors:
Sreenivas Alampalli, NYS DOT
Dan M. Frangopol, Lehigh University
Jesse Grimson, BDI
David Kosnik, CTL Group
Marvin Halling, Utah State University
Eva O.L. Lantsoght, USFQ & Delft
Jeff S. Weidner, University of Texas
David Y. Yang, Lehigh University
Y. Edward Zhou, AECOM
Reviewed by:
Erin Bell, University of New Hampshire
Christina Freeman, FL DOT
James Long, PA
Brent Phares, Iowa University
Franklin Moon, Rutgers University
Duane Otter, TTCI
Thomas E. Beitelman, AASHTO T-18 /FL DOT
Stephen Maher, TRB

 At opening of new
bridge
 Reassure traveling
public
 Engineer stands under
bridge
 Proof load testing
5/22/2020 9

 Since 1950s: better
computational
methods
 Diagnostic load testing:
SLS
 Now: evaluation of
existing structures
5/22/2020 10

 Proofload testingof existing
bridges
 Mostly RC slab bridges
 Shear-critical
 Safety philosophy
 Safe execution?
 Theoreticalwork
 Pilot proof load tests
 Collapse tests
5/22/2020 11

Bridges from 60s and 70s
The Hague in 1959
Increasedlive loads
common heavy and long truck (600 kN)
End of service life + larger loads
5/22/2020 12

5/22/2020 13

Diagnostic load testing Proof load testing
5/22/2020 14
Barcza ridge, Poland (Olaszek et
al., 2012)
Delaware (Jones, 2011)

Diagnostic load testing
 Calibration of FEM
 Strain gages over girder
height
 Low load levels (SLS)
 Rating with updated FEM
 Or: prior to opening
(presentation Andres R.)
Proof load testing
 Directly demonstrate that
bridge fulfils criteria
 Higher load levels
 Larger involved risk
 Follow measurements
 Stop criteria
5/22/2020 15

 Safety philosophy
 Stopcriteria:
o Further loading not permitted
o Failure near
o Irreversible damage near
MSc Thesis W. Vos
5/22/2020 16

 Apply predetermined load
to bridge
o Information lacking
o Damage due to ASR, …
 Proofload testing
o Immediate approval of
bridge
o Recalculate updated β
o RC slab bridges
5/22/2020 17

 DAfStB Richtlinie
 Stopcriteria
o Concrete strain
o Steel strain
o Crack width and residual
crack width (new & existing
cracks)
o Residual deflection
 For flexure
 Structures with large existing
cracking?
5/22/2020 18

 North America:
o Buildings: ACI 437.2M-13
o Bridges: Manual of Bridge
Rating Through Load Testing
(1998)
 ACI 437.2M-13 stopcriteria:
o Residual deflection
o Permanency ratio
o Deviation from Linearity Index
5/22/2020 19

 Practical recommendations for proof load testing
 Flexure + shear
 Stop criteria?
5/22/2020 20

 Proofload tests:
o Heidijk 2007
o Medemblik 2009
o Vlijmen-Oost 2013
o Halvemaans Bridge 2014
o Ruytenschildt Bridge 2014
o Viaduct in the Zijlweg 2015
o Viaduct De Beek 2015
o Vecht Bridge 2016 Load test to failure of Ruytenschildt Bridge, summer 2014
5/22/2020 21

 Field inspection
o Dimensions
o Same lay-out as plans?
o Material properties
o Damage maps
o Site restrictions
 Prior assessment
o Live load: EN 1991-2:2003
o RBK load levels
5/22/2020 22

 Critical position
o Bending moment: largest
moment
o Shear: 2.5d from support
 Requiredproof load
o Same shear or bending
moment as with load
combination
o Value → considered safety
level
5/22/2020 23

 Cyclic loading scheme
o Acoustic emission measurements
o Check linearity and reproducibility of measurements
o Check residual deformations
 Stopcriteria
o Evaluated during tests
o Research in progress
o Criteria for shear failure need to be developed
5/22/2020 24

5/22/2020 25

 Beamsfrom Ruytenschildt Bridge
o Cyclic loading protocol
o Tests: Failure in shear and flexure
 Beamscast in lab
o plain reinforcement
o cyclic loading
o shear and flexural failure
Beams RSB01 after failure (Yang, 2015)
Yang, Y. (2015)."Experimental Studieson theStructural Behavioursof Beamsfrom RuytenschildtBridge,"
Stevin Report 25.5-15-09,Delft Universityof Technology, Delft, 76 pp.
Beams RSB02B after failure (Yang, 2015)
5/22/2020 26

 Load testing:internationalinterest
 History:prior to opening
 Now: existingbridges
 Best practices
o Identify goals
o Preparation
o Inspection
o Monitoring
o Cyclic loading
Viaduct Zijlweg, tested in summer 2015
5/22/2020 27

 (Former) colleagues at TU Delft: Albert Bosman, Sebastiaan
Ensink, Dick Hordijk, Rutger Koekkoek, Marco Roosen, Cor
van der Veen, Patrick van Hemert, Yuguang Yang
 Students at TU Delft: Arthur Ennoudi, Thomas Harrewijn, Rik
Tersteeg, Werner Vos
 Rijkswaterstaat: Ane de Boer, Sonja Fennis, Marius
Naaktgeboren, Herbert van der Ham
 Contractors: de Boer en de Groot, Witteveen+Bos (Frank
Linthorst, Danny den Boef)
 Load execution: Mammoet: Otto Illing, Chris Huissen
 Funding: Noord Holland, Friesland, Rijkswaterstaat,
Chancellor Grants USFQ
5/22/2020 28

5/22/2020 29

Contact:
Eva Lantsoght
elantsoght@usfq.edu.ec // E.O.L.Lantsoght@tudelft.nl
5/22/2020 30