The economic, social community–based and productive model of Bolivia and its results

ESTADO PLURINACIONAL
DE BOLIVIA
September 10, 2013
MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA Y FINANZAS PÚBLICAS
THE ECONOMIC, SOCIALTHE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL
COMMUNITY-BASEDCOMMUNITY-BASED
AND PRODUCTIVEAND PRODUCTIVE
MODEL OF BOLIVIA ANDMODEL OF BOLIVIA AND
ITS RESULTSITS RESULTS
SANTA CRUZ - BOLIVIASANTA CRUZ - BOLIVIA

3
• The world is currently living the following
crisis:
1) A financial crisis
2) An environmental crisis
3) An energy crisis
4) A food crisis
5) A water crisis
6) A macroeconomic policies crisis
7) An institutional crisis
• In this context it is possible to talk about a
structural crisis of capitalism.
• We spotted and identified this crisis since
2006.
THE SEVEN CRISIS OF CAPITALISM
ENVIRONMENT
CRISIS
ENERGY CRISIS
FOOD CRISIS

4
II. THE NEW ECONOMIC MODEL IN
BOLIVIA

5
THE BASIS OF THE NEW MODEL
3. MODEL FOR THE REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME: The economic
surplus must be redistributed especially among people with very low
income. Cash conditional transfers (Juancito Pinto, Bono Juana Azurduy
and Renta Dignidad bonds), public investment, inversely proportional
increases in salaries, cross subsidization and others.
2. APPROPRIATION OF ECONOMIC SURPLUS: With the recuperation of
natural resources, now economic surplus remains in the country and it is
redistributed towards other sectors that generate income and employment.
1. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT BASED ON MAKING THE MOST OF
NATURAL RESOURCES FOR THE BENEFIT OF BOLIVIAN PEOPLE:
Larger economic surplus.
4. REDUCTION OF SOCIAL INEQUALITIES AND POVERTY: The model
also has a social vision.

6
Neo-liberal Economic Model
Social, Community-Based,
Productive Economic Model
Free market. The market is the
mechanism that allocates
resources and corrects
unbalances. Hypothesis of the
efficient market.
The State intervenes to correct
failures in the market (non existent
redistributing of wealth and
transnational monopoly of strategic
companies)
1. 1.
Guardian State. Watch over State.
The market is the mechanism that
auto regulates the economic
process.
2. Active participation of the State in
the economy. The State must
intervene in the economy in seven
ways: Planning, business,
investment, regulating, benefactor,
promoting, banking.
2.
Privatizing State, that transfers
surplus outside the country and
doesn’t take care of natural
resources.
Nationalization and control of
strategic natural resources.
3. 3.
Pattern of Exporting Primary
Development
4. Pattern of Industrialization and
Productive Development
4.

7
Social Community-Based
Productive Economic
Model
Concentration of income, larger
sectors excluded in society. Inverted
sense of redistribution that favors
increasing earnings for
entrepreneurs thus cutting back
salaries.
5. State that redistributes income.
De-colonizing, that incorporates
the demands of social sectors in
decision making processes.
5.
7. 7.Growth exclusively related to
external demand.
Growth related to both external and
internal demands.
Economy focused in private
endeavors, reducing to the minimum
intervention in the public sector and
increasing private earnings.
6. State that promotes plural
economy (State, private sector,
cooperative social economy and
community-based economy)
6.
8. 8.Dependence of external savings
for investment, increasing national
debt and fiscal deficit.
Generation of internal resources for
investment, less national debt and
fiscal surplus.

8
Productive Economic
Model
To preserve macroeconomic
stability as a social legacy and
promote economic development and
social as well as economic growth
with balanced redistribution of
income.
9. 9.Blockage, poverty, inequalities in
wealth and opportunities.
Larger development, redistribution
and generation of employment.
Macroeconomic stability as a goal
in itself. The fight against inflation
is the center of the economic
policy putting aside both growth
and employment.
10. 10.
11. Recuperation of sovereignty and
independence in the making of
economic policy (fiscal, monetary
and rate policies). Both fiscal
surplus and the “bolivianization” of
the economy have been achieved
since 2006.
Dependency on economic
formulas of the Washington
Consensus (IMG and WB)
11.

9
Productive Economic
Model
Fiscal and monetary policies non-
existent (continuous fiscal deficits
and high level of dollarization of
the economy).
Recuperation of sovereignty and
independence in the elaboration of
economic policy (fiscal, monetary
and rate policies) thanks to the
fiscal surplus, the “bolivianization” of
the economy and the dynamics of
internal demand respectively.
12. 12.

STRATEGIC
SECTORS THAT
GENERATE
SURPLUS
SECTORS THAT
GENERATE
INCOME AND
EMPLOYEMENT
• Hydrocarbons
• Mining
• Electricity
• Environmental
resources
• Industry, manufacturing
and craftsmanship
• Tourism
• Agricultural development
• Housing
• Commerce, transportation
and other services
Surplus
SOCIAL COMMUNITY-BASED PRODUCTIVE
ECONOMIC MODEL
10
• Bono Juancito Pinto
• Renta Dignidad
• Bono Juana Azurduy
• Poverty reduction
REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME:
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
REDISTRIBUTING STATE
INDUSTRIALIZATION

PLURAL ECONOMY
11
Promover la integración
de las diferentes formas
económicas de
producción, con el objeto
de lograr el desarrollo
económico y social
Función del Estado PRIVADA
COMUNITARIA
SOCIAL
COOPERATIVA
ESTATAL
CRECIMIENTO
ECONÓMICO CON
REDISTRIBUCIÓN
DEL INGRESO

Bolivia: Growth of real Gross Domestic Product
GDP 1985 - May 2013
(in percentage)
(p) Preliminary
Source: National Statistics Institute (INE)
Elaborated by: Ministry of Economy and Public Finances, Fiscal Analysis Network (RAF)
13
From 1985 - 2005
3,0%
From 2006 - 2012
4,8%
IGAE

Bolivia: Influence of internal demand and net exportations in the
GDP 1999 – 2012 (p)
(in percentage)
(p) Preliminary
14

Bolivia: Gross Domestic Product per Capita
1986 – 2012 (p)
(in USD)
15
(p) Preliminary

815
1.400
2.011
2.240
3.483
2.107
2.984
4.112
5.871
0
3.108
3.7561.158
1.159
2.074
2.427
1.861
1.498
1.521
1.062
794
1.628
1.672
3.324
2.262
1.840
1.505
1.654
1.331
1.124
945
950
525
923 741
1.090 1.215 1.108 1.246 1.320
6.933
5.400
6.902
11.794
6.966
9.146
4.822
4.088
2.867
2.195
6.162
0
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
9.000
10.000
11.000
12.000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2013
MillonesdeUS$
Agropecuaria
Industria Manufacturera
Extracción de Minerales
Extracción de hidrocarburos
78%78% of all
importations
are
intermediate
products and
capital goods
Bolivia: Exportations and Importations 1990 – 2012(p)
January - July 2012 – 2013(p)
(in millions of USD)
16
(p) Preliminary
Note: Doesn’t include personal effects or re-exportations.
Elaborated by: Ministry of Economy and Public Finances, Fiscal Analysis Network (RAF)Fuente: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE)
Jan - Jul
29%
12%
Exportations
Importations
Jan - Jul
4%
10%
In 2012 exportations
in the agricultural
sector and the
manufacturing
industry increased
in 53%53% and 47%47%
respectively in
comparison with
2011
524
490
837
1.119
928
1.201
1.817
1.752
926
862
997
1.281
1.467
1.770
2.599
2.305
2.803
3.844
4.127
2.053
611
946
952
1.315
1.274
1.545
2.245
910
779
374
359
403
1.953
1.245
2.330
524
458
504
1082
703
1.130 1.196
1.657
2.451
2.020 1.832
3.588
5.100
4.235
3.847
4.577
5.604
1.920
2.926
2.440
8.281
7.936
0
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
9.000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2013
MillonesdeUS$
Bienes de Capital
Materias Primas y Productos Intermedios
Bienes de Consumo
Otros

253
-357
-72
-654
-1.126
-457
-16
345
508
1.306
1.958
909
1.982
1.704
-361
-545
1.448
1.280
3.687
-2.000
-1.000
0
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2013
MillonesdeUS$
Bolivia: Commercial Balance 1990 - 2012 (p)
January - July 2012 - 2013 (p)
(in millions of US)
17
(p) Preliminary
Note: The estimation includes personal effects or re-exportations.
16%188%
Jan - July
Latin America: Commercial balance
First semester 2013
(in percentage of GDP)
-1,4%
-0,3%
-0,4%
-0,1%
0,5%
0,9%
1,0%
2,4%
6,0%
-2,4%
-4,0% -2,0% 0,0% 2,0% 4,0% 6,0%
Paraguay
Uruguay
Peru
Ecuador
Brasil
Colombia
Chile
Argentina
Venezuela (1)
Bolivia

Bolivia: Net International Reserves of the Bolivian Central Bank (BCB)
1976 - 28 August 2013
Source: Bolivian Central Bank (BCB) and other countries central banks.
Elaborated by: Ministry of Economy and Public Finances, Fiscal Analysis Network (RAF) 18
LATIN AMERICA: INTERNATIONAL
RESERVES JULY 201
(in percentage of the GDP)
4
7
7
11
13
14
15
19
29
31
51
0 20 40 60
Ecuador
Venezuela
Argentina
Colombia
México
Chile
Brasil
Paraguay
Uruguay
Perú
Bolivia
*

28.535
23.918
37.563
32.392
24.134
24.097
22.995
18.353
15.786
13.546
8.814
6.475
12.111
8.996
6.744
6.465
6.644
5.954
5.497
37.349
30.392
49.674
41.388
30.879
30.562
29.639
24.308
21.283
15.874
11.243
8.2307.8906.916
4.8673.515
2.349
1.277
0
6.000
12.000
18.000
24.000
30.000
36.000
42.000
48.000
54.000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2013
IDH
Impuestos sin IDH
Jan-Jul
19
34%34%
22%22%
3%3%
14%14%
34%34%
20%20%
Source: National Taxes Service (SIN), National Customs of Bolivia (ANB)
Bolivia: Taxes collection, 1990 – 2012
January – July, 2012 - 2013 (p)
(in millions of Bolivianos)
23%23%1%1%

-6,4
-1,8
4,5
-22,3
-30,6
1,7 1,7
-8,8
-6,1
-8,3
0,8
4,8
0,1
-4,7
3,2
1,8
-36,0
-30,0
-24,0
-18,0
-12,0
-6,0
0,0
6,0
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
(p) Preliminary
Source: Ministry of Economy and Public Finances and Central Bank of Bolivia (BCB)
Bolivia: Surplus (deficit) of Non-Financial Public Sector (SPNF)
1980 – July 2013(p)
(in percentage of the GDP)
20
Ene-Jul
Superávit (déficit) del TGN 2000–Julio 2013
(En porcentaje del PIB)
Ene-Jul
-2,9
-5,0
-6,0
-4,8
-2,6
-0,9
0,3
1,5 1,2
-0,5
3,1
0,03
-0,2
1,0
-8,0
-6,0
-4,0
-2,0
0,0
2,0
4,0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013

7.671
9.850
11.949
6.959
8.578
6.193
7.8693.200
2.443
3.964
4.636
6.758
6.924
4.640
4.573
4.208
3.075
4.800
5.359
4.745
4.048
2.135
1.773
2.228
2.007
1.152
1.567
1.767
2.072
2.698
2.212
14.539
12.978
11.762
15.285
12.940
10.330
23.019
18.741
3.7303.618
3.006
13.575
6.669
4.711
2.696
0
4.000
8.000
12.000
16.000
20.000
24.000
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2013
Universidades
Gobernaciones
Municipios
(p) Preliminary
(*) Data to July 2012 and 2013 it doesn’t include earnings of forest resources.
Source: Ministry of Economy and Public Finances. General Directorate of Fiscal Accounting (DGCF)
18%
23%
Bolivia: Departmental royalties and transfer
(departmental governments, municipalities and universities)
1994 – 2012
To July, 2012 – 2013* (p)
(in million of Bolivianos)
Until July

22
Updated to August 22, 2013
Bolivia: Transfers, departmental royalties
(departmental governments, municipalities and universities) and balance in
cash and banks 2005 – 2013
(in million of Bolivianos)
Until July
18%18%
20%20%
041
4.992
6.297
6.994
5.955
15.827
19.429
669
10.330
11.762
13.575
12.978
23.019
15.285
16.194
8.109
12.365
12.940
18.741
14.539
005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 2013
Saldo en caja y bancos
Transferencias y regalías departamentales

202 255 247 238 246 296 301 281 327
461 511
690
1.157
1.530
2.169
113 106 112 123 159 97 96 202
266
493 423
409
504
669
797
120 143 186 121 92 118 142
326
357
324 398
271
344
484
709
96 78 94 102 3 90 90
71
55
73
107 100
125
128
62
531 583 639 585
500
602 629
879
1.005
1.351
1.439
1.521
2.182
2.874
3.807
0
500
1.000
1.500
2.000
2.500
3.000
3.500
4.000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Administración Central Administración local Administración departamental
Cofinanciamiento Regional Universidades
23
Bolivia: Public Investment executed by economic sector 1999 - 2013
(p) Preliminary
Source: Vice-Ministry of Public Investment and External Financing (VIPFE)
Ppto
496
744
121
178
106
183
792
1.191
0
200
400
600
800
1.000
1.200
2012 2013
Executed Public Investment
Jan – Jun 2012 - 2013
50%
34%
22%
26%
107%
31%

24
(p) Preliminary
Source: Bolivian Central Bank (BCB)
Bolivia: Public External Debt of medium and long terms
1980 – July 2013 (p)
-11%
In millions of USD In percentage of the GDP

25
(p) Preliminary
Source: Bolivian Central Bank (BCB)
-11%
In millions of USD In percentage of the GDP
Bolivia: Internal Public Debt of the National General Treasure
(TGN), 2000 – July 2013 (p)

26
Source: Supervision Authority of he Financial System (ASFI)
20%
27%
48%
4%
21%
34%
40%
5%
Bolivia: Deposits of the public in the Financial System
2005 – July 2013
2005
US$ 3.711 millones
Jun
Julio 2013
US$ 13.545 millones

27
Bolivia: Number of deposits in the Financial System, by amount category
2005 – July 2013
(in thousands of deposits)

28
Bolivia: Gross Portfolio of the Financial System by objective of
credits, 2005 – July 2013

29
Bolivia: Bolivianization of deposits and credits in the Financial System
1995 – July 2013
(in percentage)
Jul

Bolivia: Urban open unenloyement rate
2001 – 2012 (p)
(in percentage)
30
(p) Preliminary
Source: Unit for the Analysis of Economic and Social Policies (UDAPE) based on the Homes Survey of the National Statistics Institute (INE)
8,5 8,7 8,7
8,2 8,0
7,7
4,4
4,9
3,8
3,2
11,1
12,0
12,3 12,1
11,3
9,5
10,2
11,0
7,9
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012
INE-UDAPE
CEDLA

Bolivia: Active and creation of new companies
2002 - 2012
To July 2012 - 2013 (p)
(in number of companies)
Note: During the first months of each year the amount of companies tends to increase considerably, the depuration process is carried out in December of each year
which makes date vary from January to December of a particular year.
Source: Fund for Entrepreneurial Development (FUNDEMPRESA)
38.74
0
Julio

Bolivia: Extreme poverty levels 1999 – 2012 (p)
(in percentage)
(p) Preliminary
32

33
(a): Urban Areas
Source: Economic Commission for Lain America and the Caribbean (CEPAL)
Latin America: Extreme Poverty Level, 2005 and 2011
(in percentage)
2005 2011
3,1
6,1
6,3
10,1
10,7
11,7
12,4
20,9
1,9
28,0
1,1
0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0
Uruguay (a)
Argentina (a)
Chile
Brasil
Perú
Ecuador (a)
Colombia
Venezuela
México
Bolivia
Paraguay
-17,3 pp
2005 2011
4,1
9,1
10,6
11,7
15,9
17,1
17,4
20,2
32,1
38,2
3,2
0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0
Chile
Uruguay (a)
Argentina (a)
Brasil
México
Venezuela
Ecuador (a)
Perú
Colombia
Paraguay
Bolivia
From 2011,From 2011,
Bolivia is noBolivia is no
longer thelonger the
poorest countrypoorest country
in Southin South
AmericaAmerica

34
Income comparison between the richest 10% and
the poorest 10% at a national level, 1996 - 2012
(number of times)
113
28
79
128
35
157
46
18
89
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Nacional Urbana Rural
1996
2005
2012(p)
(p) Preliminary
Source: Unit for the Analysis of Economic and Social Policies (UDAPE) based on the Homes Survey of the National Statistics Institute (INE)

35
Bolivia: Population that benefits with direct conditional cash
transfers until July 2013(p)
(in number of beneficiaries and percentage)
(p) Preliminary
Source: Ministry of Education, Fiscal Authority and Rent and Insurnce Control and Ministry of Health and Sports
Elaboración: Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas Públicas, Red de Análisis Fiscal (RAF)
1.761.057 beneficiaries
Bono Juancito Pinto (2012)
3.588.257
beneficiaries
33,0%
of the total Bolivian
population
Rest of the population
67,0 %
16,3%
992.450
beneficiaries
Renta Dignidad (July 2013)
Bono Juana Azurduy (2012)
834.750
beneficiaries
7,7%
9,0%

37
Respect to our basic rights as human
beings and tolerance towards our
differences as women and men.
Equal opportunities in all important
sectors and in every field (social,
cultural, political).
In terms of the economy, it is also very
important to achieve gender equality.
Restrictions in the access to the
productive field or limited employment
opportunities for women generate
increasing poverty.
Gender Equality in the State General Budget (PGE)

38
In the context of the implementation of public
policies to prevent discrimination, the Ministry of
Economy and Public Finances (MEFP) contributed
to the following achievements:
Inclusion of specific guidelines regarding
“Promotion and Gender Policies” and Defense and
Protection of Children and Families” in the structure
of the programs of Autonomous Territorial Entities..
Inclusion of the Expense Qualifier by Goal and
Function and the 10.9 Code “Gender Equality and
Other Services to Eliminate Inequalities and
Achieve Social Protection”.
Accountability of the Maximum Instances (MAEs)
of public services for the allocation of resources
and inclusion of actions in AOPs to contribute to
fight against racism and all forms of discrimination.
Allocation of Resources in the PGE for Gender Equality

Supreme Decree 24864, the State guarantees
equality in the rights of men and women in the
political, economic, social and cultural spheres, as
well as the inclusion of gender mainstreaming
contents in public policies to achieve real gender
equality.
Departmental Governments and Municipalities
must be accountable for this in terms of their
specific competencies.
Law Nº 348, protection programs and services for
the attention and recuperation of women victims of
violence will be organized, coordinated and
strengthened in each municipality with the
corresponding allocation of resources in their
annual budgets as permanent support instances
trough Integrated Municipal Legal Services, Home
Shelters and Temporary Shelters.
Allocation of Resources for Gender Equality in the PGE in
Autonomous Territorial Entities

Resources Allocated for Gender Issues at the Central
Level of the Government, 2009 - 2013
(in Millions of Bolivianos)
The chart includes the
ministries of Labor,
Justice, Autonomies and,
the Ministry Health and
Sports.
99% belongs to the
Ministry of Health and
Sports for the allocations
assigned trough the Bono
Juana Azurduy bond.
In 2013, 84% is financed
with resources of the
National General
Treasure (TGN).
The average execution is
64%.
Source: SIGMA
Elaborated by: MEFP-VPCF-DGPGP
+233%

Budget Assigned to Gender Issues, 2013
Municipal Autonomous Governments (GAM)
(in Millions of Bolivianos and percentages)
 66% corresponds to municipalities in the main
departments of Bolivia.
 The resources allocated for these policies
account for 2,5% of the Total Budget of GAM.
 72% correspond to resources for the SUMI.
 The average execution is 33%.
Source: SIGMA

Budget Allocated to Gender Issues, 2013
Departmental Autonomous Governments (GAD)
(in Millions of Bolivianos)
Source: SIGMA
 63% is concentrated in the GADs of Tarija,
Beni, La Paz and Santa Cruz.
 The resources allocated for these type of
policies represent 0,09% of the Total Budget of
the GADs.
 The average execution to date is 14,3%.

44Elaborated by: Ministry of Economy and Public Finances, Fiscal Analysis Network (RAF)
FINANCIAL CRISIS
In 2001 to reduce the effect of the
crisis the FED lowered the type of
interests to stimulate the economy.
In the euphoria of a continuous
increase of home prices, credits were
granted to American poor workers.
HIGH RISK
CREDITS
BANKSFEDERAL RESERVE
 2002 and 2006: Mortgage credit boom
 2007: Banks declare bankruptcy, the estimated losses are between 50 and 100 million USD
 2007-2009: The FED grants a financial rescue worth close to 7,8 billon USD
 2010 - 2011: Financial rescue to Ireland worth 85.000 million Euros and Portugal for 78.000
million Euros
 2010-2012: Financial rescue to Greece worth 110.000 million Euros
 2012: Financial rescue to Spain worth 100.000 million Euros
 April 2013: Financial rescue to Cyprus worth 10.000 million Euros
 August 2013: Germany acknowledges that Greece needs a new financial rescue
VolverVolver

45
ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS
Fuente: Agencias de Noticias Internacionales
VolverVolver
Floods in China (19 August 2013)
It severely damaged 50.000 homes, caused
the death of 130 people and the
disappearance of 102. The number of people
displaced from their homes was over 300.000
and about 3,7 millions were directly affected
by this phenomenon.
Floods in Russia (21 August 2013)
23 thousand people has been evacuated and
there is an extended threat of eventual
epidemics of diseases. 500 kilometers of
roads have been destroyed as well as bridges
and the access to 38 towns. Over 43% of
carbon reserves for winter have been spoiled.
Tornado in Japan (1 September 2013)
There are at least 63 people injured,
including 7 girls from a primary school which
roof top was completely destroyed. The
tornado also affected the electric services
leaving 33 thousand homes without
electricity.

46
ENERGY CRISIS
• India, August 2012, in one of the worst black-outs of history, more than 600 million people
have lost electric supply due to the increasing demand of energy in the country (about 9%
annually).
• Contrary to the elevated consumption of energy in developed countries, Latin American
countries have implemented programs for the efficient use of electricity and to save this type
of energy.
WORLD CONSUMPTION OF ENERGY
BackBack

47
FOOD CRISIS
INCREASING PRICES OF FOOD
AROUND THE WORLD
Fuente: Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI) y Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO)
Jun-13
Índice de precio de alimentos
MALNUTRITION IN THE WORLD
(in millions of people)
884
871
867 868 869
905 908
900
896
885
870
857
852 852 852
898
922
923
915
910
14 14 14
15
16 16
17
16
15 14
820
840
860
880
900
920
940
2000-02
2001-03
2002-04
2003-05
2004-06
2005-07
2006-08
2007-09
2008-10
2009-11
Mundo
Países en desarrollo
Países desarrollados
FAO Report
(2009): “How to
feed the World
in 2050”
The world population in 2050 will be 9,100 million. To feed this
population, food production (excluding food used for the production
of bio-fuels) must increase by 70%.
FAO – OECD
Report (2012):
“Agricultural
perspectives
2012 - 2021”
The agricultural production must increase by 60% over the next
40 years to meet the growing demand for food. However, the
potential for expansion of global agricultural land is limited. Is
expected to increase arable land only 5% by 2050. The additional
production will come from increased productivity.
BackBack

48
(e) Estimado
Fuente: Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI)
Germany
France
China
India
Spain
Italy
Economic growth in selected countries, 2005 – 2013 (e)
First trimester 2013
(in percentage)
EEUU
Grecia
-0,3
0,6
-0,4
-0,1
-4,2
5,7
7,78,0
-2,3
-1,5 -2,0
-1,6
1,81,9
-10,0
-5,0
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013e I Trim
2013
Alemania Francia Grecia India
China Italia España Estados Unidos
MACROECONOMIC POLICIES CRISIS

49
Fuente: Eurostat
France
Portugal
Spain
Euro Zone
Unemployment rates in selected countries
January 2005 – June 2013
(in percentage)
EEUU
Greece

50
Fuente: Eurostat
France
Italy
Japan
Germany
Spain
Selected countries: Public debt in percentage of GDP
2000 – 2012(p)
(in percentage)
EEUU
Greece
BackBack

51
WATER CRISIS
Fuente: Departamento de Asuntos Económicos y Sociales Naciones Unidas (ONU – DAES)
BackBack
• Throughout the last century, water use
and consumption grew at twice the rate
of population growth.
• As the world's population has surpassed
6,000 million people, some countries
have exceeded the limits of their water
resources.
• About 1,200 million people, nearly a fifth
of the world's population, live in areas
of physical water scarcity.
• With the current climate change scenario
by 2030 almost half of the world's
population will live in areas with high
water problems.
• Water scarcity is caused mainly by human
action

RESOURCES ALLOCATED TO PROGRAM 25 “PROMOTION AND
GENDER POLICIES” IN AUTONOMIC MUNCIPAL GOVERNMENTS
(in Bolivianos)
Year 2013
52
Departament
25- Promotion and Gender Policies
Current Budget Executed % Exec.
CHUQUISACA 4.428.129 2.026.438 45,76%
LA PAZ 13.925.949 4.783.150 34,35%
COCHABAMBA 18.523.459 4.139.631 22,35%
ORURO 1.715.279 160.162 9,34%
POTOSÍ 3.996.519 555.035 13,89%
TARIJA 4.568.234 1.938.276 42,43%
SANTA CRUZ 31.353.244 11.563.486 36,88%
BENI 4.087.641 1.476.839 36,13%
PANDO 1.324.019 517.776 39,11%
Total 83.922.473 27.160.793 32,36%
Source: General Directorate of Fiscal Accounting
Elaborated by: DGPGP – UET

RESOURCES ALLOCATED TO PROGRAM 26 “DEFENSE AND
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES” IN AUTONOMIC
MUNCIPAL GOVERNMENTS
(in Bolivianos)
Year 2013
53
Departamento
26 - Defensa y Protección de la Niñes y Familia
Ppto. Vigente Ejecutado % Ejec.
CHUQUISACA 8.750.557 3.038.375 34,72%
LA PAZ 31.524.256 12.848.576 40,76%
COCHABAMBA 19.632.856 4.858.562 24,75%
ORURO 3.151.424 594.464 18,86%
POTOSÍ 7.939.271 2.299.580 28,96%
TARIJA 7.327.275 3.523.997 48,09%
SANTA CRUZ 9.957.797 3.952.932 39,70%
BENI 4.850.415 2.129.693 43,91%
PANDO 2.947.995 1.337.260 45,36%
Total 96.081.846 34.583.439 35,99%

RESOURCES ALLOCATED TO UNIVERSAL MOTHER AND CHILD
INSURANCE (SUMI) IN AUTONOMIC MUNCIPAL GOVERNMENTS
(In Bolivianos)
Year 2013
54
Departament
UNIVERSAL MOTHER AND CHILD INSURANCE (SUMI)
CHUQUISACA 39.697.824 20.020.111 50,43%
LA PAZ 63.700.709 10.059.836 15,79%
COCHABAMBA 113.546.128 28.118.383 24,76%
ORURO 35.397.036 4.483.116 12,67%
POTOSÍ 34.951.656 3.413.744 9,77%
TARIJA 27.427.371 12.083.952 44,06%
SANTA CRUZ 123.979.709 50.844.344 41,01%
BENI 20.089.606 7.259.810 36,14%
PANDO 3.005.933 1.975.639 65,72%
Total 461.795.972 138.258.935 29,94%

TOTAL EXECUTION OF GENDER RESPONSIVE BUDGETS IN
MUNICIPAL AUTONOMIC GOVERNMENTS
(in Bolivianos)
Until September 2013
55
Department
25- Promotion and Gender Policies
26 – Defense and Protection of Children and
Families
Universal Mother and Child Insurance (SUMI)
Current
Budget
Executed % Exec.
Current Budget
Executed % Exec.
CHUQUISACA 4.428.129 2.026.438 45,76% 8.750.557 3.038.375 34,72% 39.697.824 20.020.111 50,43%
LA PAZ 13.925.949 4.783.150 34,35% 31.524.256 12.848.576 40,76% 63.700.709 10.059.836 15,79%
COCHABAMBA 18.523.459 4.139.631 22,35% 19.632.856 4.858.562 24,75% 113.546.128 28.118.383 24,76%
ORURO 1.715.279 160.162 9,34% 3.151.424 594.464 18,86% 35.397.036 4.483.116 12,67%
POTOSÍ 3.996.519 555.035 13,89% 7.939.271 2.299.580 28,96% 34.951.656 3.413.744 9,77%
TARIJA 4.568.234 1.938.276 42,43% 7.327.275 3.523.997 48,09% 27.427.371 12.083.952 44,06%
SANTA CRUZ 31.353.244 11.563.486 36,88% 9.957.797 3.952.932 39,70% 123.979.709 50.844.344 41,01%
BENI 4.087.641 1.476.839 36,13% 4.850.415 2.129.693 43,91% 20.089.606 7.259.810 36,14%
PANDO 1.324.019 517.776 39,11% 2.947.995 1.337.260 45,36% 3.005.933 1.975.639 65,72%
Total 83.922.473 27.160.793 32,36% 96.081.846 34.583.439 35,99% 461.795.972 138.258.935 29,94%

GENDER RESPONSIVE RESOURCES VS. TOTAL BUDGET
(in Bolivianos)
Year 2013
56
Description Current Budget
% of
Representation
25- Promotion and Gender Policies 83.922.473 0,33%
26 – Defense and Protection of Children and Family 96.081.846 0,37%
Universal mother and Child Insurance (SUMI) 461.795.972 1,80%
Gender Sub-Total 641.800.291 2,50%
Other programs 25.074.787.926 97,50%
General Total 25.716.588.217 100%

RESOURCES ALLOCATION TO GENDER ISSUES IN
AUTONOMIC DEPARTMENTAL GOVERNMENTS
(in Bolivianos)
Year 2013
57
ENT. DESCRIPTION ENT. Current Budget Executed % Exec.
901 CHUQUISACA 195.607 0 0,00%
902 LA PAZ 1.560.817 694.229 44,48%
903 COCHABAMBA 933.129 151.588 16,25%
904 ORURO 413.863 0 0,00%
905 POTOSÍ 0 0 0,00%
906 TARIJA 2.933.668 891.090 30,37%
907 SANTA CRUZ 1.500.000 0 0,00%
908 BENI 1.797.924 565.697 31,46%
909 PANDO 85.471 5.471 6,40%
Total 9.420.479 2.308.075 24,50%

The economic, social community–based and productive model of Bolivia and its results

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (14)

Similar to The economic, social community–based and productive model of Bolivia and its results

Similar to The economic, social community–based and productive model of Bolivia and its results (20)

More from Gobernabilidad

More from Gobernabilidad (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The economic, social community–based and productive model of Bolivia and its results