The document summarizes the Food Safety Modernization Act and the FDA's proposed produce safety regulations. It discusses why the law was needed due to issues like globalization and the increasing complexity of the food supply. It then outlines key provisions of the law around prevention, inspections/compliance, imports, and partnerships. It focuses on new requirements for importers to verify the safety of foreign suppliers and facilities. Finally, it discusses the FDA's approach to implementing the new rules through education, outreach, and flexibility.
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
1. FDA Food Safety
Modernization Act
Michael Rogers, M.S.
Director, Latin America Office
Food and Drug Administration
FDA – Latin America Regional Office
US-FDA-LAO@fda.hhs.gov
06/06/12 #1
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
2. Agenda
• Why is the law needed?
• Provisions of the law; focus on imports
• Implementation
06/06/12 #2
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
3. Food Safety Modernization Act
“I thank the President and
members of Congress for
recognizing that the
burden that foodborne
illness places on the
American people is too
great, and for taking this
action.”
Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D.,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs
06/06/12 #3
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
4. New law updates authority and
tools
2011 – Food Safety Modernization Act
1976 Medical Device Amendments
1938 – Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
1906 – Pure Food and Drug Act
06/06/12 #4
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
5. Why is the law needed?
Globalization
• 15 percent of U.S. food supply is imported
Food supply more high-tech & complex
• More foods in the marketplace
• New hazards in foods not previously seen
Shifting demographics
• Growing population (about 30%) of individuals are
especially “at risk” for foodborne illness
06/06/12 #5
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
6. The Public Health Imperative
• Foodborne illness is a significant burden
– About 48 million (1 in 6 Americans) get sick each year
– 128,000 are hospitalized
– 3,000 die
• Immune-compromised individuals more susceptible
– Infants and children, pregnant women, older individuals, those
on chemotherapy
• Foodborne illness is not just a stomach ache—it can cause life-long
chronic disease
– Arthritis, kidney failure
06/06/12 #6
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
7. Main Themes of the Legislation
Prevention
Inspections, Compliance,
Enhanced Partnerships
& Response
Import Safety 06/06/12 #7
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
8. Prevention:
The cornerstone of the legislation
• Comprehensive preventive controls for food
facilities
– Prevention is not new, but Congress gave FDA
explicit authority to use the tool more broadly
– Strengthens accountability for prevention
• Produce safety standards
• Intentional adulteration standards
06/06/12 #8
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
9. Inspection, Compliance &
• Response
Mandated inspection frequency
– Considering new ways to inspect
• New tools
– Mandatory recall
– Expanded records access
– Expanded administrative detention
– Suspension of registration
– Enhanced product tracing
– Third party laboratory testing 06/06/12 #9
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
10. Enhanced Partnerships:
Vital to Success
• Reliance on inspections by other agencies that meet
standards
• State/local & international capacity building
• Improve foodborne illness surveillance
• National agriculture & food defense strategy
• Consortium of laboratory networks
• Easier to find recall information
06/06/12 #10
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
11. Import Safety:
Most Groundbreaking
• Shift
Importers now responsible for ensuring their suppliers
have adequate preventive controls in place
• Can rely on third parties to certify that foreign food facilities
meet U.S. requirements
• Can require mandatory certification for high-risk foods
• Voluntary qualified importer program--expedited review
• Can deny entry if FDA access for inspection is denied
• Requires food from abroad to be as safe as domestic
06/06/12 #11
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
12. Import Safety Mandates
Sec. 301. Foreign supplier verification program
• Requires importers to verify their suppliers use risk-
based preventive controls that provide same level of
protection as U.S. requirements and that product is
not adulterated or misbranded.
Sec. 302. Voluntary qualified importer program
• Allows for expedited review and entry of products
from qualified importers received from certified
facilities
Sec. 303. Certification for high-risk food imports
• FDA has discretionary authority to require
assurances of compliance for high-risk foods 06/06/12 #12
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
13. Import Safety Mandates
Sec. 304. Prior notice of imported food shipments
• Requires information on prior refusals to be added to
prior notice submission
Sec. 305. Capacity building
• FDA mandate to work with foreign governments to build
food safety capacity
Sec. 306. Inspection of foreign food facilities
• Can deny entry if FDA access for inspection is denied
Sec. 201. Targeting of inspection resources
• Increased inspection of foreign as well as domestic
facilities
06/06/12 #13
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
14. Import Safety Mandates
Sec. 307. Accreditation of third-party auditors
• FDA can rely on accredited third parties to certify that
foreign food facilities meet U.S. requirements
Sec. 308. Foreign Offices of the Food and Drug
Administration.
• Establish offices in foreign countries to provide
assistance on food safety measures for food exported to
the U.S.
Sec. 309. Smuggled Food
• In coordination with DHS, better identify and prevent
entry of smuggled food
06/06/12 #14
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
15. Role of Third-Party Certification
Programs
• Tool for importers to obtain needed assurances to meet
their obligations for the foreign supplier verification
program (sec. 301)
• A way for importers to participate in the voluntary
qualified importer program to expedite movement of food
through the import process (sec. 302)
• Can be required by FDA to accompany high-risk foods
(sec. 303)
06/06/12 #15
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
16. FDA Accreditation Body (or FDA)
Recognizes Accredits 3rd parties
Accreditation Bodies Sec. 307
3rd Party Auditor
Certify high-risk
food imports
Voluntary Qualified Foreign supplier
Importer Program verification program
Importer inspection and High-risk Food Foreign firms may use
product certification enable Certification Certification as a tool
expedited product entry When required by FDA Sec. 301
Sec. 302 Sec. 303
06/06/12 #16
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
17. Implementation Approach
• Implementation already underway
• Coalition needed
• Transparency a priority
• Focus on public health protection
• Engage with stakeholders to help determine
reasonable and practical ways to implement
provisions
06/06/12 #17
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
18. Triggers Regulatory Process
(Rulemaking)
• Legislation
• Petition
• Court Decision
• Accident/Incident
• Technology
Proposed Final Effective
Triggering Event
Rule Rule Date
FSMA
(Step 1) (Step 2) (Step 3)
Initial Research
• Identify problem Additional
• Substantiate problem WE ARE HERE Tools
• Determine solution
06/06/12 #18
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
19. Rulemaking Process:
It Doesn’t Happen Overnight
1. FDA proposes rule and We are nearly here
requests comments
2. FDA considers comments and
issues final rule
3. FDA sets dates for companies to comply
06/06/12 #19
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
20. Strategic Communications
Implementation Executive & Outreach Team –
Committee
Implementation Sharon Natanblut
Executive
Committee
Prevention Inspection/ Federal/State Fees Reports/
Imports
Standards Compliance David Elder Integration Studies
Don Kraemer Barbara Cassens Joe Reardon David Wardrop David Dorsey
Importer
Mandatory
Produce Safety Verification & Inspection & Reports to
Recall and Recall Operational
Regulation VQIP Auditor Fees Congress/
Communications Partnership
Studies
Produce Safety Administrative Import
Guidance Enforcement Certification
Tools
Capacity
Accredited Building
Preventive
Third- Party
Controls Registration Certification
Regulation
Lab
Accreditation &
Preventive Frequency of Integrated Training
Controls Inspection Consortium/
Guidance FERN
International
Safe Food
Tracing Capacity
Transport
Building
Manner of
Food Defense Inspection/Food Comparability
Safety Plan
Review
Contaminants Task A:
RFR
Prior Notice
Improvements
06/06/12 #20
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
21. Implementation & Compliance
Educate before we regulate
• Partner with stakeholders to provide education & outreach
Non-traditional strategy:
• Educate & outreach to enhance compliance
• Small entity compliance guide on how to comply with the regulations
• Updated GAPs guidance
• Utilize existing & develop new partnerships with governments
• Consider how existing efforts & information may be used
• Develop appropriate review & oversight mechanism
• Interface with trade associations, commodity groups, individuals
with diverse farming practices and operations
Flexibility built into regulation via Alternative approaches, Variances and Compliance dates
06/06/12 #21
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
22. Additional Resources
• FDA FSMA page:
http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FSMA/default.htm
• Produce Safety Alliance:
http://producesafetyalliance.cornell.edu/psa.html
• FDA Produce Safety Activities:
http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/Product-SpecificInformation/FruitsV
06/06/12 #22
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
23. For more
information
• Web site at:
www.fda.gov/fsma
• Subscription
feature available
To Submit Comments:
• www.regulations.g
ov 06/06/12 #23
FDA’s Current Thinking: Proposed Produce Safety Regulation
Congress passed the FSMA with overwhelming bi-partisan majorities in December 2010 and President Obama signed the legislation into law on January 4, 2011.
Sec. 301. Foreign supplier verification program Requires importers to verify their suppliers use risk-based preventive controls that provide same level of protection as U.S. requirements and that product is not adulterated or misbranded. Sec. 302. Voluntary qualified importer program Allows for expedited review and entry of products from qualified importers received from certified facilities Sec. 303. Certification for high-risk food imports FDA has discretionary authority to require assurances of compliance for high-risk foods
The regulatory process, also known as “rulemaking,” is triggered by an event such as a petition, court decision, accident or incident, technology or legislation. The enactment of the Food Safety Modernization Act directed FDA to issue several regulations. After the triggering event, there are 3 primary steps in the process---Proposed Rule Making, Final Rule and Effective Date. We could have other interim steps like issuing a modified proposed rule or an interim final rule. However, we’ll present the basic process that we typically follow. Details of these 3 steps are on the NEXT SLIDE.
The proposed rule & final rule & supporting documents are filed in FDA’s official docket on: http://www.regulations.gov & also can be accessed at www.fda.gov/fsma.
These additional resources are available for information and updates so check back frequently.
Se puede suscribir haciendo click en “Get FSMA Updates by E mail” You may Subscribe by clicking on “Get FSMA Updates by E-mail”
Muchas gracias por su atención de hoy. Nos puede contactar directamente al correo indicado o a los teléfonos siguientes.