Degradación CIS módulos tras 1 año exterior
•Descargar como PPT, PDF•
0 recomendaciones•998 vistas
Dr. Gustavo Nofuentes Garrido. UJAEN. España XVII Simposio Peruano de Energia Solar IV Conferencia Latinoamericana de Energía Solar Blog: solucionessolares.blogspot.com
![DEGRADACIÓN DE MÓDULOS CIS TRAS UN AÑO DE EXPOSICIÓN EXTERIOR EN UN ENCLAVE SOLEADO Nofuentes G., Fuentes M., Aguilera J., De la Casa, J. Plazaola, C. (*) Grupo de Investigación IDEA. Escuela Politécnica Superior. Universidad de Jaén. Campus de Las Lagunillas, s/n. 23071-Jaén ( España ). Tel: +34 953 212 434. Fax: +34 953 211 967. E-mail: [email_address] (*) Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá IV Conferencia Latino Americana de Energía Solar (IV ISES_CLA) y XVII Simposio Peruano de Energía Solar (XVII- SPES) Cuzco (Perú), 1-5 noviembre de 2010](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/10presentacingustavonofuentes1830-110519110619-phpapp01/85/Degradacion-de-modulos-CIS-tras-un-ano-de-exposicion-exterior-en-un-enclave-soleado-1-320.jpg)
![ESQUEMA DE LA PRESENTACIÓN ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Destacado
Destacado (20)
Similar a Degradación CIS módulos tras 1 año exterior
Similar a Degradación CIS módulos tras 1 año exterior (20)
Más de Roberto Valer
Más de Roberto Valer (10)
Último
Último (20)
Degradación CIS módulos tras 1 año exterior
- 1. DEGRADACIÓN DE MÓDULOS CIS TRAS UN AÑO DE EXPOSICIÓN EXTERIOR EN UN ENCLAVE SOLEADO Nofuentes G., Fuentes M., Aguilera J., De la Casa, J. Plazaola, C. (*) Grupo de Investigación IDEA. Escuela Politécnica Superior. Universidad de Jaén. Campus de Las Lagunillas, s/n. 23071-Jaén ( España ). Tel: +34 953 212 434. Fax: +34 953 211 967. E-mail: [email_address] (*) Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá IV Conferencia Latino Americana de Energía Solar (IV ISES_CLA) y XVII Simposio Peruano de Energía Solar (XVII- SPES) Cuzco (Perú), 1-5 noviembre de 2010
- 6. CONFIGURACIÓN EXPERIMENTAL Módulos A y B, desde ahora Dos módulos calibrados Shell TM ST40 de 40 Wp Módulo calibrado Shell TM ST5 de 5Wp: sensor de irradiancia DTR Pt100: Sensor de temperatura de célula Fuente de alimentación (Kepco TM BOP36-12M) + Unidad de conmutación (Agilent TM 34970A) + Labview TM sobre PC Trazador de curvas Tensión-Intensidad Relés de alta potencia. Es posible secuenciar la obtención de curvas V-I de hasta 4 módulos JAÉN Lat. 38ºN; Long. 3ºO Clima continental-mediterráneo
- 7. RESULTADOS EMPÍRICOS (1/5) Regresión lineal: el coeficiente de temperatura para la potencia máxima (gamma) resultó ser mejor para ambos módulos que el proporcionado por el fabricante (-0.0048 ºC -1 vs -0,006 ºC -1 ))!!! Método de T.Strand et al.: módulo A (1/2) Tc (ºC) Potencia máxima normalizada a 1000 W·m -2 (W)
- 8. RESULTADOS EMPÍRICOS (2/5) Método de T.Strand e al.: módulo A (2/2) Potencia máxima normalizada y corregida en temperatura para CEM (W)
- 9. RESULTADOS EMPÍRICOS (3/5) Método de T.Strand e al.: módulo B Potencia máxima normalizada y corregida en temperatura para CEM (W)
- 10. RESULTADOS EMPÍRICOS (4/5) Factor de rendimiento Performance Ratio ( PR M ) Donde: E = Energía producida en el período de tiempo bajo análisis(Wh); H = Irradiación incidente durante el período de tiempo bajo nanálisis (Wh·m -2 ); G* = 1000 W·m -2 ; P* MOD,M = Potencia pico calibrada por un Laboratorio Acreditado Independiente (W) PR M anual = 0,93 para el módulo A PR M anual = 0,89 para el módulo B
- 11. Calibración en CEM de la potencia máxima de los módulos en el CIEMAT-IER antes y después de la campaña experimental Junio 2006 Julio 2007 Degradación del 4,3% (módulo A) y 5,3% (módulo B) RESULTADOS EMPÍRICOS (5/5) Wp
- 13. Gracias por su atención Dr. G. Nofuentes Tel: +34.953.212.434 Fax: +34.953.211967 E-Mail: gnofuen@ujaen.es IV Conferencia Latino Americana de Energía Solar (IV ISES_CLA) y XVII Simposio Peruano de Energía Solar (XVII- SPES) Cuzco (Perú), 1-5 noviembre de 2010
Notas del editor
- The used outdoor measurement system is installed in the laboratory in the High Technical School building of the University of Jaén (Spain, latitude 38ºN, longitude 3º W, with a Continental-Mediterranean climate). The calibration in STC of all significant electrical parameters of two 40-Wp ShellTM ST40 CIGS modules,–modules A and B, from now on- was entrusted to the accredited independent laboratory (AIL) CIEMAT-IER (Madrid) at the beginning of our work. Additionally, a small 5-Wp Shell TM ST5 CIGS module was also calibrated to play the role of an irradiance sensor of the same technology as the modules to be tested. two four-wire RTD Pt100 pasted at the backskin of each one of the two calibrated PV modules to measure the cell temperature. A current-voltage curve tracer (IVCT) has been developed using a power supplier (KepcoTM BOP36-12M), a datalogger (AgilentTM 34970A), a class 0·5-60mV/4A shunt resistor, a calibrated 5-Wp Shell TM ST5 CIGS module to measure the incident irradiance and two four-wire RTD Pt100 pasted at the backskin of each one of the two calibrated PV modules to measure the cell temperature. Labview TM software running on a personal computer drives this IVCT. Consequently, the I-V curve and temperature of a cell of each PV module together with the incident irradiance are periodically scanned every two minutes.
- Using a linear regression of maximum power –normalized to G = 1000 W·m -2 - vs. cell temperature, as depicted in figures 5 and 6, yields cell maximum power temperature coefficients for modules A and B, respectively. It is worth mentioning that these values were found to be better than those provided by the manufacturer. The figure on the RHS of the slide shows the module maximum power normalized to 1000 W·m-2 and corrected to 25 ºC using the above calculated coefficients. A very good stability over time is highly noticeable. A bold horizontal line represents the result of the measurement of module peak power provided by the AIL in its certificate of calibration. The distance between the two horizontal dashed lines equals the 95% confidence interval provided by the above certificate of calibration. In this paper, the module performance ratio ( PR M ) has been calculated as the ratio of the module delivered energy per watt peak to the collected irradiation in kWh·m -2 . It stems from these excellent figures that the CIGS modules have experienced a negligible decrease in their maximum power in STC.
- Using a linear regression of maximum power –normalized to G = 1000 W·m -2 - vs. cell temperature, as depicted in figures 5 and 6, yields cell maximum power temperature coefficients for modules A and B, respectively. It is worth mentioning that these values were found to be better than those provided by the manufacturer. The figure on the RHS of the slide shows the module maximum power normalized to 1000 W·m-2 and corrected to 25 ºC using the above calculated coefficients. A very good stability over time is highly noticeable. A bold horizontal line represents the result of the measurement of module peak power provided by the AIL in its certificate of calibration. The distance between the two horizontal dashed lines equals the 95% confidence interval provided by the above certificate of calibration. In this paper, the module performance ratio ( PR M ) has been calculated as the ratio of the module delivered energy per watt peak to the collected irradiation in kWh·m -2 . It stems from these excellent figures that the CIGS modules have experienced a negligible decrease in their maximum power in STC.
- Using a linear regression of maximum power –normalized to G = 1000 W·m -2 - vs. cell temperature, as depicted in figures 5 and 6, yields cell maximum power temperature coefficients for modules A and B, respectively. It is worth mentioning that these values were found to be better than those provided by the manufacturer. The figure on the RHS of the slide shows the module maximum power normalized to 1000 W·m-2 and corrected to 25 ºC using the above calculated coefficients. A very good stability over time is highly noticeable. A bold horizontal line represents the result of the measurement of module peak power provided by the AIL in its certificate of calibration. The distance between the two horizontal dashed lines equals the 95% confidence interval provided by the above certificate of calibration. In this paper, the module performance ratio ( PR M ) has been calculated as the ratio of the module delivered energy per watt peak to the collected irradiation in kWh·m -2 . It stems from these excellent figures that the CIGS modules have experienced a negligible decrease in their maximum power in STC.
- Using a linear regression of maximum power –normalized to G = 1000 W·m -2 - vs. cell temperature, as depicted in figures 5 and 6, yields cell maximum power temperature coefficients for modules A and B, respectively. It is worth mentioning that these values were found to be better than those provided by the manufacturer. The figure on the RHS of the slide shows the module maximum power normalized to 1000 W·m-2 and corrected to 25 ºC using the above calculated coefficients. A very good stability over time is highly noticeable. A bold horizontal line represents the result of the measurement of module peak power provided by the AIL in its certificate of calibration. The distance between the two horizontal dashed lines equals the 95% confidence interval provided by the above certificate of calibration. In this paper, the module performance ratio ( PR M ) has been calculated as the ratio of the module delivered energy per watt peak to the collected irradiation in kWh·m -2 . It stems from these excellent figures that the CIGS modules have experienced a negligible decrease in their maximum power in STC.
- Maximum power measured under real sunlight has been compared to modelled maximum power during an experimental campaign ranging from July 2006 to March 2007. This modelled maximum power has been calculated using measured values of G and TC together with the calibrated values of all significant electrical parameters as input data for some tried simple algebraic methods. In the terms defined in a following section, the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean bias error (MBE) derived from measured vs. modelled maximum power have been analysed. Both RMSE and MBE provide the guidance to know which algebraic method(s) fit(s) best the experimental data so as to be recommended.