Estudio Ciber Acoso Internacional: Ciber Crimen España. Halt abuse ha publicado el Estudio Internacional sobre VÍctimas de Ciberacoso. Comparativa de estadísticas del 2000 al 2012

1. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
# OF CASES
2000
353
2001
256
2002
218
2003
198
2004
196
2005
443
2006
372
2007
249
2008
234
2009
220
2010
349
2011
305
2012
394
TOTAL
3787
%
VICTIM GENDER
Female
Male
UNKNOWN
87%
13%
0
79.3% 71%
16% 28%
4.7% 1%
70%
27%
3%
69%
18%
13%
67%
25%
8%
70% 61%
28.5% 21%
1.5% 18%
71%
21%
8%
78%
21%
1%
73%
27%
0%
74%
26%
0%
80%
20%
0%
2769
866
152
72.5
22.5
5
HARASSER GENDER
Female
Male
Multiple/Gangs
UNKNOWN
27%
68%
0
5%
32.5%
58.6%
0
8.9%
35%
52%
0
13%
38%
52.5%
0
9.5%
23.5%
52.5%
0
24%
21.5%
43.5%
2.5%
32.5%
27.5%
36.5%
0
12.2%
30%
39%
0
31%
31%
42%
0
27%
35%
45%
0
20%
36%
44.5%
3%
16.5%
33.5%
40%
0%
26.5%
31%
49%
0%
20%
1144
1809
34
800
30.25
47.5
1.25
21
VICTIM AGE
Under 18
18-30
31-40
41+
UNKNOWN
0
54%
27%
19%
62.5%
0
44.6%
26.2%
6.3%
22.9%
0
50%
36%
2%
12%
0
63.5%
25%
6%
5.5%
0
48%
27%
23%
2%
1%
38%
25%
30%
6%
0
40%
29%
28.5%
2.5%
0
28%
24%
29%
19%
2%
35%
23%
32%
8%
0
34%
30%
32%
4%
.25%
41%
29%
27.5%
2.25%
0%
35%
33%
32%
0%
0%
36%
38%
26%
0%
10
2845
1093
965
226
.5
39.75
27.75
24.75
7.25
VICTIM RACE
CAUCASIAN
HISPANIC
ASIAN
AFRO-AMERICAN
NATIVE AMERICAN
EAST INDIAN
UNKNOWN
55%
1.5%
1%
.5%
1%
1%
0
60.6%
2.7%
4%
1.6%
2%
.8%
28.3%
77%
4.5%
3%
3.5%
1.5%
1.5%
9%
75%
6%
2%
5%
1.5%
.5%
10%
78%
3.5%
3%
3%
1%
1%
10%
73%
5.5%
4%
4%
2.5%
1%
10%
76.5%
4%
6%
2.5%
1.5%
0
9.5%
66%
4%
5%
3%
1%
0
24%
74%
6.5%
4%
3.5%
2%
0
10%
69.5%
3%
8.5%
7.5%
1.5%
0
10%
66.5% 82%
5%
6.75%
6.25% 3.75%
6%
5.5%
1.25% 1.5%
.25% .5%
14.75% 0%
81%
8%
6%
4%
1%
0%
0%
2716
181
164
142
57
17
510
70.5
4.25
4
3.5
1
.25
16.5
1

2. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
VICTIM MARITAL STATUS*
2000
SINGLE
N/A
MARRIED
N/A
DIVORCED
N/A
LIFE PARTNER
N/A
SEPARATED
N/A
WIDOWED
N/A
UNKNOWN
N/A
(*We didn’t calculate this statistic until 2001)
2001
40.7%
28.1%
5.9%
2%
1.2%
0
22.1%
2002
48%
32%
7%
5%
2%
.5%
5.5%
2003
40.5%
33%
10%
8%
2%
1.5%
5%
2004
44%
28.5%
11%
5.5%
4.5%
1%
4.5%
2005
37.5%
31.5%
11.5%
4%
2.5%
1.5%
11.5%
2006
46%
29.5%
10.5%
6%
2.5%
.5%
5%
2007
32%
27%
8%
3%
1%
3%
26%
RELATIONSHIP TO VICTIM
YES
NO
UNKNOWN
2000
47%
53%
0
2001
45.3%
44.3%
10.4%
2002
59%
41%
0
2003
58%
42%
0
2004
45%
54%
0
2005
49.5%
50.5%
0
2006
48.5%
51.5%
0
2007 2008
44% 57%
56% 43%
0
0
IF YES, HOW?
EX
FRIEND
WORK
ONLINE ACQAINTANCE
SCHOOL
FAMILY
ONLINE EX
OTHER
2000
25.5%
28%
0
0
0
25.5%
0
21%
2001
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
2002
28%
16%
9%
28%
1.5%
4%
0
13%
2003
57%
20%
9%
7.25%
5%
1.75%
0
0
2004
53.5%
9%
6%
20%
6.5%
5%
0
0
2005
33.5%
10.5%
11.5%
26.5%
4%
3.25%
5.5%
1.25%
2006
47%
12%
6.5%
25%
5%
4.5%
0
0
2007
31%
14%
7%
27%
1%
13%
0
7%
2
2008
2009
31.5% 43%
18.5% 27%
11.5% 11.5%
2%
2%
2%
2%
.5%
.5%
34%
34%
2008
45%
6%
6.5%
8%
.5%
8%
19.5%
6.5%
2010 2011
45.5% 53%
28.25% 26%
11.5% 14%
2.5% 4%
4.25% 2%
0
1%
8% 0%
2012
69%
25%
1%
4%
1%
0%
0%
TOTAL
1552
957
316
140
71
27
724
%
36
25.25
9.25
3.75
1.5
.75
23.5
2009
61%
39%
0
2010
47%
53%
0
2011
59%
125%
0%
2012
63%
37%
0
TOTAL
1929
1831
27
%
49.25
49.75
1
2009
43%
7.5%
8%
22%
4%
14%
0
1.5%
2010
55%
7%
8%
12%
3.5%
6.5%
0
8%
2011 2012
56% 24%
12.75% 4%
7.25% 8%
7.25% 19%
1.5% 2%
12.75% 6%
0%
0
2.5% 0
TOTAL
756
223
145
347
55
164
38
201
%
39.5
12.5
6.75
16.25
2.75
0
2.25
20

3. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
HOW DID HARASSMENT BEGIN? 2000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
2009 2010 2011 2012
TOTAL
%
EMAIL
39.5% 40.3% 47.5% 35% 41.5% 35% 31% 36% 36%
34% 34% 32% 31%
1315
35.25
MSG BOARD*
17.5% 16.9% 14% 16.5% 13.5% 16.5% 16.5% 11% 11.5% 8.5% 9.5% 7%
6%
484
13
IM
13% 5.9% 11.5% 17% 17.5% 16% 17% 11%
8%
13% 6%
2.75% 7%
420
11.5
CHAT
15.5% 14.1% 7.5% 8%
5.5% 8.5% 7.5% 5%
5%
6%
2.5% 4%
4%
282
8
WEB SITE
7.5% 6.3% 8.5% 7.5% 6%
3.5% 8%
6%
5%
7%
4.5% 10.5% 10%
301
7.75
FACEBOOK
---------5.5% 16.5% 16% 16%
178
3.5
PHONE
--------7%
2.5% 6.25% 0%
0
54
1.75
MYSPACE
--------5.5%
5.5% 4.5% .5%
0
30
1
DATING
---------2.5% 1.25% .5%
0
13
.25
CRAIGSLIST
---------2.5% 1.5% .5%
1%
18
.25
TEXTING
---------2.5% 4.5% 7.25% 5%
62
1.25
GAMING
---------2.5% .25% 2.5% 4%
34
.5
OTHER**
7%
16.5% 11% 16% 16% 20.5% 38% 31% 22%
8%
8.75% 16.5% 16%
710
16
*Includes Message boards, groups, usenet
**Includes auctions, blogs, Youtube, Twitter, hacking, mailing list, Juicy Campus, Ripoff Reports, keyloggers/virus, Formspring, Topix, Skype, Ustream, Yelp, ED)
DID IT ESCALATE ONLINE?*
YES
NO
2000
N/A
N/A
2001 2002
39.4% 34%
60.6% 66%
2003 2004 2005
62.5% 40.5% 60%
37.5% 59.5% 40%
2006
44%
56%
2007 2008
55% 71%
45% 29%
2009
66%
34%
2010
79%
21%
2011
80%
20%
2012
83%
17%
TOTAL
2370
1417
%
60.25
39.75
OFFLINE THREATS?*
YES
NO
N/A
N/A
35.9% 34%
64.1% 66%
38%
62%
22%
78%
24%
76%
25%
75%
16.5% 26%
83.5% 74%
7%
93%
6%
94%
751
2378
21.5
78.5
DID VICTIM REPORT IT?*
YES
N/A
NO
N/A
*We didn’t calculate this statistic until 2001
81.7% 78%
18.3% 22%
66.5% 66%
33.5% 34%
59.5% 72.5% 59%
40.5% 27.5% 41%
70%
30%
72%
28%
77.5% 81%
22.5% 19%
2163
966
54.25
45.75
40.5% 22%
59.5% 78%
3
61%
39%

4. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
IF SO, TO WHO?
(In order of importance - some victims reported to multiple)
REPORTED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT
REPORTED TO HARASSER’S ISP(S)
REPORTED TO WEB ADMIN/MODERATOR/WEB HOST
REPORTED TO LAWYER
REPORTED TO SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE
REPORTED TO AUCTION/FOR SALE SITE
OTHER (includes school, employer, family, friends)
RESOLUTION BY WHOA
(In order of importance, some cases were resolved utilizing several of these options)
VICTIM CHANGED E-MAIL/ISP/USERNAME AND/OR PASSWORD
CONTACTED HARASSER’S ISP(S)
VICTIM DIDN’T RESPOND TO WHO@ ADVOCATE*
REFERRED VICTIM TO LAW ENFORCEMENT
REPORTED TO WEB SITE HOST/OWNER
REPORTED TO MYSPACE
WAS NOT A CASE
REPORTED TO MODERATOR
REPORTED TO SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE
REFERRED VICTIM TO LAWYER
VICTIM WOULDN’T TAKE OUR ADVICE
REPORTED TO AUCTION/FOR SALE SITE
WAS NIGERIAN SCAM/LOTTERY
OTHER**
*Usually means the harassment either stopped on its own, stopped because the victim followed our initial advice or the victim stopped responding to the harasser)
**Reported to cell phone provider/phone provider; reported to Youtube, etc
4

5. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
TOP LOCATIONS
2000
VICTIMS
CALIFORNIA `
13%
PENNSYLVANIA
7.5%
FLORIDA
7%
VIRGINIA, NEW YORK
5%
CANADA
4%
MASSACHUSETTS
3.5%
(*we didn’t begin calculating this stat until 2001)
HARASSERS*
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2001
CAL, NY, TEXAS
VA, FL
MARYLAND
ILLINOIS
MASSACHUSETTS
VICTIMS
5.9%
4.3%
3.9%
3.1%
2.3%
TEXAS
NEW YORK
CAL, IL, FL
MASSACHUSETTS
ENGLAND
HARASSERS*
5.5%
4.7%
4.3%
2.7%
2.4%
2002
CALIFORNIA
CANADA
NEW YORK
TEXAS
IL, GA
VICTIMS
13%
5.5%
5%
4%
3.75%
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
CANADA
IL, GA
MISSOURI
HARASSERS
7.5%
4%
3%
2.75%
2.25%
2003
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
PENN, TX
FLORIDA
GEORGIA, CANADA
VICTIMS
14%
8%
5%
4.5%
3.5%
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS, ENGLAND
GEORGIA
ILLINOIS, NY
MA, PENN, CANADA
HARASSERS
7.5%
4.5%
3.5%
3%
2.5%
5

6. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
2004
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
VIRGINIA
CANADA
OHIO
PA, TX, MO, ENGLAND
VICTIMS
13.5%
7%
6.5%
5.5%
5%
3.5%
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
VIRGINIA
OHIO
GA, IL, PA, TX
HARASSERS
11.75%
4%
3.5%
3%
2.5%
2005
CALIFORNIA
CANADA
FLORIDA
NEW YORK
PENNSYLVANIA
MICHIGAN
OHIO
GEORGIA
VIRGINIA
TEXAS
VICTIMS
9%
8%
7%
5%
4%
4%
3.5%
3.5%
3.5%
3%
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
NEW YORK
GEORGIA
FLORIDA
PENNSYLVANIA
ENGLAND
CANADA
NEW JERSEY
OHIO
HARASSERS*
12%
5%
5%
3%
3%
3%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2%
2006
CALIFORNIA
CANADA
NEW YORK
PENNSYLVANIA
TEXAS
FLORIDA
UNITED KINGDOM
NORTH CAROLINA
WASHINGTON
GEORGIA
VICTIMS
10.5%
7.5%
7%
5%
4.5%
4.5%
4%
4%
4%
3%
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
CANADA
PENNSYLVANIA
TEXAS
OHIO
UNITED KINGDOM
WASHINGTON
NORTH CAROLINA
FLORIDA/GEORGIA
HARASSERS
7.5%
4.5%
4%
4%
4%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
6

7. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
2007
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
FLORIDA
ILLINOIS
GEORGIA
UNITED KINGDOM
PENNSYLVANIA
WASHINGTON
CANADA
TEXAS/NEW JERSEY
VICTIMS
9%
7%
5%
5%
4%
4%
3%
3%
3%
3%
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
FLORIDA
ILLINOIS
GEORGIA
TEXAS
CANADA/OHIO
NEW JERSEY
UNITED KINGDOM
MARYLAND
HARASSERS
8%
6%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2008
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
FLORIDA
TEXAS
PENNSYLVANIA
NORTH CAROLINA
CANADA
MASSACHUSETTS
WASHINGTON
UK
VICTIMS
14%
7%
5%
4.5%
4%
4%
3.5%
7%
3%
2.5%
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
FLORIDA
TEXAS
PENNSYLVANIA
NORTH CAROLINA
UK
CANADA
OHIO
MASSACHUSETTS
HARASSERS
13%
12%
3%
3%
3%
2.5%
2.5%
2%
2%
2%
7

8. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
2009
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
PENNSYLVANIA
FLORIDA
MARYLAND
CANADA
NEW YORK
ILLINOIS
VIRGINIA
MASSACHUSETTS
VICTIMS
13%
7%
6%
6%
5.5%
5%
4%
4%
4%
2.5%
2010
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
NEW YORK
FLORIDA
PENNSYLVANIA
CANADA
ARIZONA
N. CAROLINA
WASHINGTON
MARYLAND
VICTIMS
9.75%
7.5%
7%
5.25%
3.75%
4%
3.75%
3.75%
3.75%
2.75%
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
NEW YORK
CANADA
MARYLAND
ILLINOIS
MINNESOTA
NEW JERSEY
NORTH CAROLINA
PENNSYLVANIA
HARASSERS
9%
5.5%
4.5%
3%
3%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
TEXAS
CALIFORNIA
NEW YORK
CANADA
FLORIDA
ILLINOIS
ENGLAND
WASHINGTON
TENNESSEE
PENNSYLVANIA
HARASSERS
8.5%
8%
5.5%
4.25%
3.75%
3.5%
2.75%
2.5%
1.75%
1.75%
8

9. WHOA (HALTABUSE.ORG)
COMPARISON STATISTICS 2000-2012
2011
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
FLORIDA
NEW YORK
ENGLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
N. CAROLINA
WASHINGTON
MARYLAND
VIRGINIA
VICTIMS
14.75%
8.5%
6.5%
5.25%
3.5%
3.5%
3.25%
2.75%
2.75%
2.75%
2012
VICTIMS
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
CANADA
FLORIDA
N. CAROLINA
NEW YORK
MASSACHUSETTS
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
LOUISIANA
16%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2.75%
3%
2.75%
2.75%
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
PENNSYLVANIA
NEW YORK
FLORIDA
ENGLAND
N. CAROLINA
ILLINOIS
OHIO
CANADA
HARASSERS
13%
5%
4%
3.5%
3.25%
3%
2.25%
1.75%
1.75%
1.75%
HARASSERS
CALIFORNIA
TEXAS
CANADA
N. CAROLINA
ARIZONA
VIRGINIA
PENNSYLVANIA
AUSTRALIA
INDIA
LOUISIANA
12.5%
9%
6%
3%
2.75%
2.75%
2%
2.75%
2.75%
2.75%
9