Este documento resume la estrategia de recuperación mejorada con CO2 de PEMEX y las perspectivas de proyectos de captura, uso y almacenamiento geológico de CO2. Discutió el potencial de la inyección de CO2 para mejorar la recuperación de petróleo en 11 campos prioritarios y los resultados obtenidos de pruebas piloto. También analizó las perspectivas de proyectos integrales que capturen CO2 de instalaciones de PEMEX y CFE para su inyección en yacimientos petrolíferos. Concl
EED - BOE Declaración de impacto ambiental Fondo de Barril Cepsa El Estrecho Digital
El Boletín Oficial del Estado ha publicado, con fecha 5 de noviembre, la Resolución de 21 de octubre de 2020, de la Dirección General de Calidad y Evaluación Ambiental, por la que se formula declaración de impacto ambiental del proyecto «Fondo de Barril en Refinería Gibraltar-San Roque», la cual analiza los principales elementos considerados en la evaluación practicada: el documento técnico del proyecto, el estudio de impacto ambiental (EsIA), el resultado de la información pública y de las consultas efectuadas, así como la documentación complementaria aportada por el promotor (la compañía Cepsa) y las consultas adicionales realizadas.
Es un caso hipotético, dónde se toma una planta que se implantó hace pocos años, y se comprueba el uso de la tecnología SNCR para abatir los óxidos de nitrógeno es factible o no lo es.
BLOQUE: PROCESOS METALÚRGICOS
Conferencia técnica
William Torres
Director de Operaciones
Southern Perú Copper Corporation
Miércoles 18 de setiembre, 2013
EED - BOE Declaración de impacto ambiental Fondo de Barril Cepsa El Estrecho Digital
El Boletín Oficial del Estado ha publicado, con fecha 5 de noviembre, la Resolución de 21 de octubre de 2020, de la Dirección General de Calidad y Evaluación Ambiental, por la que se formula declaración de impacto ambiental del proyecto «Fondo de Barril en Refinería Gibraltar-San Roque», la cual analiza los principales elementos considerados en la evaluación practicada: el documento técnico del proyecto, el estudio de impacto ambiental (EsIA), el resultado de la información pública y de las consultas efectuadas, así como la documentación complementaria aportada por el promotor (la compañía Cepsa) y las consultas adicionales realizadas.
Es un caso hipotético, dónde se toma una planta que se implantó hace pocos años, y se comprueba el uso de la tecnología SNCR para abatir los óxidos de nitrógeno es factible o no lo es.
BLOQUE: PROCESOS METALÚRGICOS
Conferencia técnica
William Torres
Director de Operaciones
Southern Perú Copper Corporation
Miércoles 18 de setiembre, 2013
The Reserve is the largest, most respected registry in North America with five protocols applicable for use in Mexico. Carbon offset credits registered under these protocols are issued as Climate Reserve Tonnes (CRTs) and may be transacted for voluntary purposes in Mexico, North America, and globally.
The Reserve offers protocol-specific, customized trainings events upon request. To learn more information, visit our Mexico Protocols Training page.
Climate Action Reserve protocols currently available for use in Mexico include: Boiler Efficiency, Forest, Landfill, Livestock and Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)
Northern Lights: A European CO2 transport and storage project Global CCS Institute
The Global CCS Institute hosted the final webinar of its "Telling the Norwegian CCS Story" series which presented Northern Lights. This project is part of the Norwegian full-scale CCS project which will include the capture of CO2 at two industrial facilities (cement and waste-to-energy plants), transport and permanent storage of CO2 in a geological reservoir on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.
Northern Lights aims to establish an open access CO2 transport and storage service for Europe. It is the first integrated commercial project of its kind able to receive CO2 from a variety of industrial sources. The project is led by Equinor with two partners Shell and Total. Northern Lights aims to drive the development of CCS in Europe and globally.
Webinar: Policy priorities to incentivise large scale deployment of CCSGlobal CCS Institute
The Global CCS Institute released a new report highlighting strategic policy priorities for the large-scale deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS). The Institute’s report also reviews the progress achieved until now with existing policies and the reasons behind positive investment decisions for the current 23 large-scale CCS projects in operation and construction globally.
Telling the Norwegian CCS Story | PART II: CCS: the path to a sustainable and...Global CCS Institute
The Global CCS Institute in collaboration with Gassnova hosted the second webinar of its "Telling the Norwegian CCS Story" series.
The second webinar presented Norcem's CCS project at their cement production facility in Brevik, in the South-Eastern part of Norway.
Telling the Norwegian CCS Story | PART I: CCS: the path to sustainable and em...Global CCS Institute
In 2018, the Norwegian government announced its decision to continue the planning of a demonstration project for CO2 capture, transport and storage. This webinar focuses on the Fortum Oslo Varme CCS project. This is one of the two industrial CO2 sources in the Norwegian full-scale project.
At their waste-to-energy plant at Klemetsrud in Oslo, Fortum Oslo Varme produces electricity and district heating for the Oslo region by incinerating waste. Its waste-to-energy plant is one of the largest land-based sources of CO2 emissions in Norway, counting for about 20 % of the city of Oslo’s total emissions. The CCS project in Oslo is an important step towards a sustainable waste system and the creation of a circular economy. It will be the first energy recovery installation for waste disposal treatment with full-scale CCS.
Fortum Oslo Varme has understood the enormous potential for the development of a CCS industry in the waste-to-energy industry. The company is working to capture 90 % of its CO2 emissions, the equivalent of 400 000 tons of CO2 per year. This project will open new opportunities to reduce emissions from the waste sector in Norway and globally. Carbon capture from waste incineration can remove over 90 million tons of CO2 per year from existing plants in Europe. There is high global transfer value and high interest in the industry for the project in Oslo.
The waste treated consists of almost 60 % biological carbon. Carbon capture at waste-to-energy plants will therefore be so-called BIO-CCS (i.e. CCS from the incineration of organic waste, thereby removing the CO2 from the natural cycle).
Find out more about the project by listening to our webinar.
Decarbonizing Industry Using Carbon Capture: Norway Full Chain CCSGlobal CCS Institute
Industrial sectors such as steel, cement, iron, and chemicals production are responsible for over 20 percent of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. To be on track to meet greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets established as part of the Paris Climate Accord, all sectors must find solutions to rapidly decarbonize, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is the only path for energy-intensive industries.
This webinar will explore how one country, Norway, is working to realize a large-scale Full Chain CCS project, where it is planning to apply carbon capture technology to several industrial facilities. This unique project explores capturing CO2 from three different industrial facilities - an ammonia production plant, a waste-to-energy plant, and a cement production facility. Captured CO2 will be then transported by ship to a permanent off-shore storage site operated as part of a collaboration between Statoil, Total, and Shell. When operational, Norway Full Chain CCS will capture and permanently store up to 1.5 million tons of CO2 per year.
During this webinar, Michael Carpenter, Senior Adviser at Gassnova, will provide an overview of the Norway Full Chain CCS, and discuss the value that Norway aims to derive from it. The key stakeholders working on this exciting project, and how they cooperate, will be also discussed. Gassnova is a Norwegian state enterprise focusing on CCS technology, which manages the Norway Full Chain CCS project.
Cutting Cost of CO2 Capture in Process Industry (CO2stCap) Project overview &...Global CCS Institute
The CO2StCap project is a four year initiative carried out by industry and academic partners with the aim of reducing capture costs from CO2 intensive industries (more info here). The project, led by Tel-Tek, is based on the idea that cost reduction is possible by capturing only a share of the CO2emissions from a given facility, instead of striving for maximized capture rates. This can be done in multiple ways, for instance by capturing only from the largest CO2 sources at individual multi-stack sites utilising cheap waste heat or adapting the capture volumes to seasonal changes in operations.
The main focus of this research is to perform techno-economic analyses for multiple partial CO2 capture concepts in order to identify economic optimums between cost and volumes captured. In total for four different case studies are developed for cement, iron & steel, pulp & paper and ferroalloys industries.
The first part of the webinar gave an overview of the project with insights into the cost estimation method used. The second part presented the iron & steel industry case study based on the Lulea site in Sweden, for which waste-heat mapping methodology has been used to assess the potential for partial capture via MEA-absorption. Capture costs for different CO2 sources were compared and discussed, demonstrating the viability of partial capture in an integrated steelworks.
Webinar presenters included Ragnhild Skagestad, senior researcher at Tel-Tek; Maximilian Biermann, PhD student at Division of Energy Technology, Chalmers University of Technology and Maria Sundqvist, research engineer at the department of process integration at Swerea MEFOS.
The Global CCS Institute and USEA co-hosted a briefing on the importance of R&D in advancing energy technologies on June 29 2017. This is the presentation given by Ron Munson, Global Lead-Capture at the Global CCS Institute.
The Global CCS Institute and USEA co-hosted a briefing on the importance of R&D in advancing energy technologies on June 29 2017. This is the presentation given by Alfred “Buz” Brown, Founder, CEO and Chairman of ION Engineering.
The Global CCS Institute and USEA co-hosted a briefing on the importance of R&D in advancing energy technologies on June 29 2017. This is the presentation given by Tim Merkel, Director, Research and Development Group at Membrane Technology & Research (MTR)
Mission Innovation aims to reinvigorate and accelerate global clean energy innovation with the objective to make clean energy widely affordable. Through a series of Innovation Challenges, member countries have pledged to support actions aimed at accelerating research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) in technology areas where MI members believe increased international attention would make a significant impact in our shared fight against climate change. The Innovation Challenges cover the entire spectrum of RD&D; from early stage research needs assessments to technology demonstration projects.
The Carbon Capture Innovation challenge aims to explore early stage research opportunities in the areas of Carbon Capture, Carbon Utilization, and Carbon Storage. The goal of the Carbon Capture Innovation Challenge is twofold: first, to identify and prioritize breakthrough technologies; and second, to recommend research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) pathways and collaboration mechanisms.
During the webinar, Dr Tidjani Niass, Saudi Aramco, and Jordan Kislear, US Department of Energy, provided an overview of progress to date. They also highlighted detail opportunities for business and investor engagement, and discuss future plans for the Innovation Challenge.
Karl Hausker, PhD, Senior Fellow, Climate Program, World Resources Institute, is the leader of the analytic and writing team for the latest study by the Risky Business Project: From Risk to Return: Investing in a Clean Energy Economy. Co-Chairs Michael Bloomberg, Henry Paulson, Jr, and Thomas Steyer tasked the World Resources Institute with this independent assessment of technically and economically feasible pathways that the US could follow to achieve an 80% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050. These pathways involve mixtures of: energy efficiency, renewable energy, nuclear power, carbon capture and storage, increased carbon sequestration in US lands, and reductions in non-CO2 emissions. These pathways rely on commercial or near-commercial technologies that American companies are adopting and developing.
Dr Hausker presented the results of the study and draw some comparisons to the US Mid Century Strategy report submitted to the UNFCCC. He has worked for 30 years in the fields of climate change, energy, and environment in a career that has spanned legislative and executive branches, research institutions, NGOs, and consulting.
This webinar offered a unique opportunity to learn more about various decarbonization scenarios and to address your questions directly to Dr Hausker.
Webinar Series: Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum Part 1. CCUS in the Uni...Global CCS Institute
The Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF) is a Ministerial-level international climate change initiative that is focused on the development of improved cost-effective technologies for carbon capture and storage (CCS). As part of our commitment to raising awareness of CCS policies and technology, CSLF, with support from the Global CCS Institute, is running a series of webinars showcasing academics and researchers that are working on some of the most interesting CCS projects and developments from around the globe.
This first webinar comes to you from Abu Dhabi – the site of the Mid-Year CSLF Meeting and home of the Al Reyadah Carbon Capture, Utilization & Storage (CCUS) Project. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is one of the world’s major oil exporters, with some of the highest levels of CO2 emissions per capita. These factors alone make this a very interesting region for the deployment of CCUS both as an option for reducing CO2 emissions, but also linking these operations for the purposes of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations.
In the UAE, CCUS has attracted leading academic institutes and technology developers to work on developing advanced technologies for reducing CO2 emissions. On Wednesday, 26th April, we had the opportunity to join the Masdar Institute’s Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering, Mohammad Abu Zahra to learn about the current status and potential for CCUS in the UAE.
Mohammad presented an overview of the current large scale CCUS demonstration project in the UAE, followed by a presentation and discussion of the ongoing research and development activities at the Masdar Institute.
This webinar offered a rare opportunity to put your questions directly to this experienced researcher and learn more about the fascinating advances being made at the Masdar Institute.
Energy Security and Prosperity in Australia: A roadmap for carbon capture and...Global CCS Institute
On 15 February, a Roadmap titled for Energy Security and Prosperity in Australia: A roadmap for carbon capture and storage was released. The ACCS Roadmap contains analysis and recommendations for policy makers and industry on much needed efforts to ensure CCS deployment in Australia.
This presentation focused on the critical role CCS can play in Australia’s economic prosperity and energy security. To remain within its carbon budget, Australia must accelerate the deployment of CCS. Couple with this, only CCS can ensure energy security for the power sector and high-emissions industries whilst maintain the the vital role the energy sector plays in the Australian economy.
The webinar also detailed what is required to get Australia ready for widespread commercial deployment of CCS through specific set of phases, known as horizons in strategic areas including storage characterisation, legal and regulatory frameworks and public engagement and awareness.
The Roadmap serves as an important focal point for stakeholders advocating for CCS in Australia, and will provide a platform for further work feeding into the Australian Government’s review of climate policy in 2017 and beyond.
It is authored by the University of Queensland and Gamma Energy Technology, and was overseen by a steering committee comprising the Commonwealth Government, NSW Government, CSIRO, CO2CRC Limited, ACALET - COAL21 Fund and ANLEC R&D.
This webinar was presented by Professor Chris Greig, from The University of Queensland.
Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 5: So...Global CCS Institute
The fifth webinar in the public engagement, education and outreach for CCS Series will explore the critically important subject of social site characterisation with the very researchers who named the process.
We were delighted to be able to reunite CCS engagement experts Sarah Wade and Sallie Greenberg, Ph.D. to revisit their 2011 research and guidance: ‘Social Site Characterisation: From Concept to Application’. When published, this research and toolkit helped early CCS projects worldwide to raise the bar on their existing engagement practices. For this webinar, we tasked these early thought leaders with reminding us of the importance of this research and considering the past recommendations in today’s context. Sarah and Sallie tackled the following commonly asked questions:
What exactly is meant by social site characterisation?
Why it is important?
What would they consider best practice for getting to understand the social intricacies and impacts of a CCS project site?
This entire Webinar Series has been designed to share leading research and best practice and consider these learnings as applied to real project examples. So for this fifth Webinar, we were really pleased to be joined by Ruth Klinkhammer, Senior Manager, Communications and Engagement at CMC Research Institutes. Ruth agreed to share some of her experiences and challenges of putting social site characterisation into practice onsite at some of CMC’s larger research projects.
This Webinar combined elements of public engagement research with real world application and discussion, explore important learnings and conclude with links to further resources for those wishing to learn more. This a must for anyone working in or studying carbon capture and storage or other CO2 abatement technologies. If you have ever nodded along at a conference where the importance of understanding stakeholders is acknowledged, but then stopped to wonder – what might that look like in practice? This Webinar is for you.
Managing carbon geological storage and natural resources in sedimentary basinsGlobal CCS Institute
To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute, together with Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development (ANLEC R&D), will hold a series of webinars throughout 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website.
This is the eighth webinar of the series and will present on basin resource management and carbon storage. With the ongoing deployment of CCS facilities globally, the pore space - the voids in the rock deep in sedimentary basins – are now a commercial resource. This is a relatively new concept with only a few industries utilising that pore space to date.
This webinar presented a framework for the management of basin resources including carbon storage. Prospective sites for geological storage of carbon dioxide target largely sedimentary basins since these provide the most suitable geological settings for safe, long-term storage of greenhouse gases. Sedimentary basins can host different natural resources that may occur in isolated pockets, across widely dispersed regions, in multiple locations, within a single layer of strata or at various depths.
In Australia, the primary basin resources are groundwater, oil and gas, unconventional gas, coal and geothermal energy. Understanding the nature of how these resources are distributed in the subsurface is fundamental to managing basin resource development and carbon dioxide storage. Natural resources can overlap laterally or with depth and have been developed successfully for decades. Geological storage of carbon dioxide is another basin resource that must be considered in developing a basin-scale resource management system to ensure that multiple uses of the subsurface can sustainably and pragmatically co-exist.
This webinar was presented by Karsten Michael, Research Team Leader, CSIRO Energy.
Mercury and other trace metals in the gas from an oxy-combustion demonstratio...Global CCS Institute
To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute together with ANLEC R&D will hold a series of webinars throughout 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website. This is the seventh webinar of the series and presented the results of a test program on the retrofitted Callide A power plant in Central Queensland.
The behaviour of trace metals and the related characteristics of the formation of fine particles may have important implications for process options, gas cleaning, environmental risk and resultant cost in oxy-fuel combustion. Environmental and operational risk will be determined by a range of inter-related factors including:
The concentrations of trace metals in the gas produced from the overall process;
Capture efficiencies of the trace species in the various air pollution control devices used in the process; including gas and particulate control devices, and specialised systems for the removal of specific species such as mercury;
Gas quality required to avoid operational issues such as corrosion, and to enable sequestration in a variety of storage media without creating unacceptable environmental risks; the required quality for CO2 transport will be defined by (future and awaited) regulation but may be at the standards currently required of food or beverage grade CO2; and
Speciation of some trace elements
Macquarie University was engaged by the Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development Ltd (ANLEC R&D) to investigate the behaviour of trace elements during oxy-firing and CO2 capture and processing in a test program on the retrofitted Callide A power plant, with capability for both oxy and air-firing. Gaseous and particulate sampling was undertaken in the process exhaust gas stream after fabric filtration at the stack and at various stages of the CO2 compression and purification process. These measurements have provided detailed information on trace components of oxy-fired combustion gases and comparative measurements under air fired conditions. The field trials were supported by laboratory work where combustion took place in a drop tube furnace and modelling of mercury partitioning using the iPOG model.
The results obtained suggest that oxy-firing does not pose significantly higher environmental or operational risks than conventional air-firing. The levels of trace metals in the “purified” CO2 gas stream should not pose operational issues within the CO2 Processing Unit (CPU).
This webinar was presented by Peter Nelson, Professor of Environmental Studies, and Anthony Morrison, Senior Research Fellow, from the Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University.
Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 4: Is...Global CCS Institute
Teesside Collective has been developing a financial support mechanism to kickstart an Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) network in the UK. This project would transform the Teesside economy, which could act as a pilot area in the UK as part of the Government’s Industrial Strategy.
The final report– produced by Pöyry Management Consulting in partnership with Teesside Collective – outlines how near-term investment in CCS can be a cost-effective, attractive proposition for both Government and energy-intensive industry.
The report was published on Teesside Collective’s website on 7 February. You will be able to view copies of the report in advance of the webinar.
We were delighted to welcome Sarah Tennison from Tees Valley Combined Authority back onto the webinar programme. Sarah was joined by Phil Hare and Stuart Murray from Pöyry Management Consulting, to take us through the detail of the model and business case for Industrial CCS.
This webinar offered a rare opportunity to speak directly with these project developers and understand more about their proposed financial support mechanism.
Laboratory-scale geochemical and geomechanical testing of near wellbore CO2 i...Global CCS Institute
To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute together with ANLEC R&D will hold a series of webinars throughout 2016 and 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website. This is the sixth webinar of the series and presented the results of chemical and mechanical changes that carbon dioxide (CO2) may have at a prospective storage complex in the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia.
Earth Sciences and Chemical Engineering researchers at the University of Queensland have been investigating the effects of supercritical CO2 injection on reservoir properties in the near wellbore region as a result of geochemical reactions since 2011. The near wellbore area is critical for CO2 injection into deep geological formations as most of the resistance to flow occurs in this region. Any changes to the permeability can have significant economic impact in terms of well utilisation efficiency and compression costs. In the far field, away from the well, the affected reservoir is much larger and changes to permeability through blocking or enhancement have relatively low impact.
This webinar was presented by Prof Sue Golding and Dr Grant Dawson and will provide an overview of the findings of the research to assist understanding of the beneficial effects and commercial consequences of near wellbore injectivity enhancement as a result of geochemical reactions.
Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 3: Ca...Global CCS Institute
The third webinar in the public engagement, education and outreach for CCS Series digged deeper, perhaps multiple kilometres deeper, to explore successful methods for engaging the public on the often misunderstood topic of carbon (CO2) storage.
Forget bad experiences of high school geology, we kick-started our 2017 webinar program with three ‘rock stars’ of CO2 storage communication – Dr Linda Stalker, Science Director of Australia’s National Geosequestration Laboratory, Lori Gauvreau, Communication and Engagement Specialist for Schlumberger Carbon Services, and Norm Sacuta, Communication Manager at the Petroleum Technology Research Centre who all joined Kirsty Anderson, the Institute’s Senior Advisor on Public Engagement, to discuss the challenges of communicating about CO2 storage. They shared tips, tools and some creative solutions for getting people engaged with this topic.
This entire Webinar Series has been designed to hear directly from the experts and project practitioners researching and delivering public engagement, education and outreach best practice for carbon capture and storage. This third webinar was less focused on research and more on the real project problems and best practice solutions. It is a must for anyone interested in science communication/education and keen to access resources and ideas to make their own communications more engaging.
Water use of thermal power plants equipped with CO2 capture systemsGlobal CCS Institute
The potential for increased water use has often been noted as a challenge to the widespread deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Early studies, that are widely referenced and cited in discussions of CCS, indicated that installation of a capture system would nearly double water consumption for thermal power generation, while more recent studies show different results. The Global CCS Institute has conducted a comprehensive review of data available in order to clarify messages around water consumption associated with installation of a capture system. Changes in water use estimates over time have been evaluated in terms of capture technology, cooling systems, and how the data are reported.
Guido Magneschi, Institute’s Senior Advisor – Carbon Capture, and co-author of the study, presented the results of the review and illustrated the main conclusions.
1. Estrategia de Recuperación Mejorada con CO2 de PEMEX y
Perspectivas de Proyectos de CCUS-EOR
Introduction to Capture, Use and Geological Storage of CO2
October 13-14, 2014
Museo Tecnológico de la CFE
SUPPORTED BY:
2. Contenido
Antecedentes
Programa de RMej de PEP y potencial del CO2
Proyectos de EOR-CO2 y resultados obtenidos
Perspectivas de proyectos de CCUS - EOR
Conclusiones
SUPPORTED BY:
3. Antecedentes: Ciclo de Vida de un Yacimiento y FR Típicos
Primaria Secundaria
SUPPORTED BY:
Mejorada
•Emplea energía natural
del yacimiento.
•Usa sistemas artificiales
de producción.
Factores de
Recuperación Típicos
Tiempo
Producción
•Agrega energía
al yacimiento.
•En YF, acelera
prodn de aceite
móvil.
• Libera aceite
atrapado en el medio
poroso: Procesos
Térmicos, Químicos
e Iny Gases
4. Antecedentes: Experiencia Internacional de EOR-CO2
• Se aplica desde inicios de los años 70. Se han hecho mejoras al proceso, conocidas como
WAG y TWAG.
• Desde 1972, han operado más de 100 proyectos en los EUA; poco más de 70 están activos
y producen del orden de 250 MBD . Se han reportado aplicaciones exitosas en Canadá, Mar
del Norte y Trinidad, entre otras.
• Es una tecnología probada: el CO2 actúa como un solvente que reduce las fuerzas que
retienen al aceite en el medio poroso: hincha al aceite residual y reduce su viscosidad
aumentando su movilidad a través de la roca.
• Del orden de 60 a 70% del CO2 que se inyecta permanece en el yacimiento, y el que
eventualmente se produce en la corriente de gas se reinyecta, o es empleado en otros
proyectos similares.
SUPPORTED BY:
5. Contenido
Antecedentes
Programa de RMej de PEP y potencial del CO2
Proyectos de EOR-CO2 y resultados obtenidos
Perspectivas de proyectos de CCUS - EOR
Conclusiones
SUPPORTED BY:
6. La estrategia de RMej de PEP: Se enfoca a campos que contienen
el 60% del total del aceite
SUPPORTED BY:
Implementación considerada en 19
campos o complejos de campos más
grandes
Impacto potencial del 60% del VOA
(volumen original de aceite) de todos los
campos de México
Gran diversidad geológica entre los
campos seleccionados: marinos como
terrestres, de rocas carbonatadas
naturalmente fracturadas y areniscas no
fracturadas.
Fuente: Producción y Reservas por campo – Pemex 2010
7. Programa de RMej de PEMEX: 11 de los 19 campos prioritarios se
identificaron candidatos potenciales a EOR con CO2
SUPPORTED BY:
Producción acum de aceite
Volumen remanente
CO2
EOR con CO2 podría
primeramente implementarse en
campos que suman un volumen
original de aceite de 22,000 MMB
Representan 9% del VOA de
todos los campos y 16% del VOA
de los campos considerados en el
programa estratégico
* Campos: Coyotes, Soledad y Humapa
8. Programa de RMej: Se estimaron requerimientos de CO2 para la
primera ronda de campos
SUPPORTED BY:
Considerando un factor de
eficiencia del CO2 de 10,000
PC/B de aceite, es posible
estimar los requerimientos
Campos considerados: Maloob,
ATG*, Ogarrio y San Andrés.
2,408 MMPCD (120,400 Ton/D)
903 MMPCD (45,150 Ton/D)
(1) 20 años de horizonte de tiempo analizado
(2) SEMARNAT. Fuentes de emisión de CO2 en 2007
* Campos: Coyotes, Soledad y Humapa
9. Programa de RMej: Ubicación de las pruebas piloto y fuentes
potenciales de CO2
RMej con CO2
Fuentes antropogénicas de CO2
Fuentes naturales de CO2
SUPPORTED BY:
Campos que podrían requerir el CO2 capturado en la planta termoeléctrica
de Tuxpan corresponden al Paleocanal de Chicontepec. Para pruebas
piloto PEMEX cuenta con fuentes internas de alta pureza (Quebrache).
10. Contenido
Antecedentes
Programa de RMej de PEP y potencial del CO2
Proyectos de EOR-CO2 y resultados obtenidos
Perspectivas de proyectos de CCUS - EOR
Conclusiones
SUPPORTED BY:
11. Inyección de CO2 en campos de Chicontepec
• Se realizó prueba piloto de inyección continua de CO2 en el campo Coyotes en 2010 que
puso en evidencia la falta de continuidad hidráulica entre el pozo inyector y los seis
productores vecinos, ubicados a no mas de 400 m.
• Se generó una hipótesis para explicar los resultados del piloto, que establece que la
continuidad lateral y vertical de los cuerpos de arena es limitada, dada la reconocida
complejidad geológica de los yacimientos del Paleocanal.
• El resultado adverso de la prueba piloto en Coyotes replanteó la inyección de CO2 en la
modalidad huff’ puff, o cíclica, para estimular la productividad de aceite de los pozos.
• Se hicieron pruebas huff’puff en once pozos del norte, centro y sur de Chicontepec: nueve
incrementaron producción aunque cuatro alcanzaron índices de consumo de CO2 mayores
que el límite económico.
• Se requieren estudios y pruebas adicionales en campo para redimensionar el potencial real
del CO2 en Chicontepec
SUPPORTED BY:
12. Contenido
Antecedentes
Programa de RMej de PEP y potencial del CO2
Proyectos de EOR-CO2 y resultados obtenidos
Perspectivas de proyectos de CCUS - EOR
Conclusiones
SUPPORTED BY:
13. Perspectivas de CCUS-EOR: Instalaciones y campos de PEMEX
• PEMEX posee un gran número de fuentes antropogénicas de CO2 que podrían
aprovecharse en RMej y que permitirían reducir la huella de carbono de la empresa.
• La viabilidad de proyectos integrales de esta naturaleza requiere de que existan fuentes de
emisión y captura de CO2 cercanas a yacimientos petroleros
• Esto ocurre en el Sur Oeste de México, en donde existen centros de Refinación y
Petroquímica (Cosoleacaque, Morelos, …) cercanos a los campos del Activo de Producción
Cinco Presidentes (APCP)
• La Estrategia Actualizada de Recuperación Mejorada de PEMEX da prioridad al proyecto de
Captura de CO2 en el Centro Petroquímico de Cosoleacaque, CPQC, y su inyección en
campo selecto del APCP: Primer proyecto del Mapa de Ruta de CCUS-EOR de México
• El CO2 del CPQC proviene de plantas de amoníaco y es de alta pureza (98%)
SUPPORTED BY:
14. Perspectivas de CCUS-EOR: Proyectos PEMEX-CFE
Captura de CO2 en plantas termoeléctricas de CFE .
• En los últimos años PEMEX y CFE han analizado la viabilidad de proyectos de captura
de CO2 en plantas termoeléctricas y su inyección en yacimientos para EOR:
• Proyecto demostrativo PEMEX-CFE 250 MW (2011): La incertidumbre resultante de
la prueba piloto de inyección continua de CO2 en el campo Coyotes impidió asumir
el compromiso de emplear el CO2 capturado en este proyecto (25 MMPCD)
• Piloto PEMEX-CFE 2 MW (2012): El volumen de CO2 a capturarse en este piloto
(Aprox. 0.1 MMPCD) sería muy reducido y sin posibilidades de emplearse, inclusive
en operaciones huff&puff
• PEMEX podrá comprometerse a emplear el CO2 proveniente de la Termoeléctrica de
Tuxpan, después de realizar los estudios y pruebas adicionales para redimensionar el
potencial de EOR-CO2 en Chicontepec y en otros campos de la Región Norte de PEP
SUPPORTED BY:
15. Perspectivas de CCUS-EOR: Aspectos relevantes
• La elección de las fuentes internas o externas de CO2 para proyectos de EOR deberá
definirse con base en la mayor viabilidad técnica, económica y logística considerando la
responsabilidad social corporativa de la empresa.
• La Ley General de Responsabilidad Ambiental, promulgada por el gobierno federal, trae
implicaciones a PEMEX al emplear CO2 procedente de fuentes externas con propósitos
de recuperación mejorada, por lo que será necesario:
• Establecer una responsabilidad compartida, como podría ser con CFE, en el caso de
emplearse el CO2 capturado en sus plantas.
• El reconocimiento del Sector de Energía de que los proyectos de CCUS-EOR se
alinean con la política energética del país.
• Definir, a nivel nacional, a quien se contabilizan las emisiones y reducciones de CO2
derivadas de la EOR
SUPPORTED BY:
16. Contenido
Antecedentes
Programa de RMej de PEP y potencial del CO2
Proyectos RMej-CO2 y resultados obtenidos
Perspectivas de proyectos de CCUS - EOR
Conclusiones
SUPPORTED BY:
17. Conclusiones
• Los proyectos de EOR con CO2 representan una posibilidad de secuestro de CO2 en yacimientos
petroleros para incrementar la recuperación de aceite.
• La EOR con CO2 permitirá a PEMEX cumplir compromisos adquiridos con el gobierno federal de
reducir emisiones de CO2 a la atmósfera. Proyectos integrales de captura de CO2 en
instalaciones de PEMEX y uso en la recuperación mejorada de aceite de sus yacimientos son por
lo tanto prioritarios.
• PEMEX podrá asumir compromisos con CFE para el uso del CO2 que podría capturarse en la
planta termoeléctrica de Tuxpan después de redefinir el uso y potencial requerimiento de CO2 en
los campos de Chicontepec, y en otros campos de la Región Norte.
SUPPORTED BY:
18. Conclusiones…
• La elección de las fuentes internas o externas de CO2 para proyectos de RMej se deberá definir
con base en mayor viabilidad técnica, económica y logística
• De emplearse CO2 de fuentes externas en proyectos de recuperación mejorada se considera
necesario, entre otros: 1) Establecer una responsabilidad compartida, 2) Definir a quien se
contabilizan las emisiones de CO2 y 3) El reconocimiento de alineación con la política energética
del país.
SUPPORTED BY:
19. Estrategia de Recuperación Mejorada con CO2 de PEMEX y
Perspectivas de Proyectos de CCUS-EOR
Introduction to Capture, Use and Geological Storage of CO2
SUPPORTED BY:
October 13-14, 2014
Museo Tecnológico de la CFE