Descargar para leer sin conexión
![CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR
www.funcionjudicial-sucumbios.gob.ec
Case Number No: 21100-2003-0002 Judicial Mailbox No: 63
By: LILIA MARLENE ORTIZ VÁSQUEZ
Nueva Loja, Friday, August 3, 2012
TO: DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIVADENEIRA
Dr./Atty.: DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIBADENEIRA (CALLEJAS & ASOCIADOS)
In Summary Verbal Proceeding No. 21100-2003-0002 pursued by MARÍA AGUINDA et al. against DR.
ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIVADENEIRA, there is the following:
PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS. – OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF
THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS. Nueva Loja, Friday, August 3, 2012,
at 3:00 p.m. HAVING REVIEWED THE RECORD. Add to the record the motions filed by the plaintiffs
on August 1, 2012, at 2:24 p.m., and on August 2, 2012, at 3:16 p.m. Add to the file the motions filed by
the defendant on August 1, 2012, at 4:54 p.m., 5:01 p.m., and 5:03 p.m.; likewise, add the motions filed
by the defendant on August 2, 2012, at 8:17 a.m., at 11:51 a.m., and at 11:59 a.m. In response to the
request the defendant makes in its motion dated August 1, 2012, at 4:54 p.m., regarding the first point
about the calculation of the amount of the item “assessment of attorneys’ fees,” as the plaintiffs rightly
state, I have already ruled on the issue in question, and as for the second point, about others having paid
the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, the defendant has not legally substantiated these arguments. Regarding the
motion for appeal filed on August 1, 2012, at 5:01 p.m., it is denied as inadmissible, since this case is in
the execution phase. The motion and the attachments filed with it on August 2, 2012, at 8:17 a.m., have
already been ruled on in prior orders, so it would be improper for me to rule on the request. And
regarding the motion filed on August 2, 2012, at 11:59 a.m., the defendant is once again informed that
the fact that it disagrees with my opinion should not be understood to mean that it is being denied justice.
The second motion for appeal, filed on August 2, 2012, at 11:51 a.m., has already been ruled on, above.
In response to the plaintiffs’ request, and since the [defendant] has objected to the cost assessor’s report,
the objections have not been duly supported under the law, so under Article 939 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, the Court approves the report; and, consequently, the Court orders the [defendant],
CHEVRON CORPORATION, to pay the amount of $19,041,414,529.00 United States dollars within 24
hours or, within the same time period, to surrender property equivalent to that amount, free of all
encumbrances. Atty. Marco Vizueta Encalada shall serve as Acting Recording Clerk. NOTIFY THE
PARTIES. Signed) DR. LILIA MARLENE ORTIZ VÁSQUEZ, DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE
PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS.
I inform you of this for legal purposes.
ATTORNEY MARCO VIZUETA ENCALADA
RECORDING CLERK (ACTING)
[circular stamp] PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBIOS OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ex-171017172443/85/Ex-127-1-320.jpg)
![CERT. MERRILL VER: JD
REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR
www.funcionjudicial-sucumbios.gob.ec
Case Number No: 21100-2003-0002 Judicial Mailbox No: 63
By: LILIA MARLENE ORTIZ VÁSQUEZ
Nueva Loja, Friday, August 3, 2012
TO: DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIVADENEIRA
Dr./Atty.: DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIBADENEIRA (CALLEJAS & ASOCIADOS)
In Summary Verbal Proceeding No. 21100-2003-0002 pursued by MARÍA AGUINDA et al. against DR.
ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIVADENEIRA, there is the following:
PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS. – OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF
THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS. Nueva Loja, Friday, August 3, 2012,
at 3:00 p.m. HAVING REVIEWED THE RECORD. Add to the record the motions filed by the plaintiffs
on August 1, 2012, at 2:24 p.m., and on August 2, 2012, at 3:16 p.m. Add to the file the motions filed by
the defendant on August 1, 2012, at 4:54 p.m., 5:01 p.m., and 5:03 p.m.; likewise, add the motions filed
by the defendant on August 2, 2012, at 8:17 a.m., at 11:51 a.m., and at 11:59 a.m. In response to the
request the defendant makes in its motion dated August 1, 2012, at 4:54 p.m., regarding the first point
about the calculation of the amount of the item “assessment of attorneys’ fees,” as the plaintiffs rightly
state, I have already ruled on the issue in question, and as for the second point, about others having paid
the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, the defendant has not legally substantiated these arguments. Regarding the
motion for appeal filed on August 1, 2012, at 5:01 p.m., it is denied as inadmissible, since this case is in
the execution phase. The motion and the attachments filed with it on August 2, 2012, at 8:17 a.m., have
already been ruled on in prior orders, so it would be improper for me to rule on the request. And
regarding the motion filed on August 2, 2012, at 11:59 a.m., the defendant is once again informed that
the fact that it disagrees with my opinion should not be understood to mean that it is being denied justice.
The second motion for appeal, filed on August 2, 2012, at 11:51 a.m., has already been ruled on, above.
In response to the plaintiffs’ request, and since the [defendant] has objected to the cost assessor’s report,
the objections have not been duly supported under the law, so under Article 939 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, the Court approves the report; and, consequently, the Court orders the [defendant],
CHEVRON CORPORATION, to pay the amount of $19,041,414,529.00 United States dollars within 24
hours or, within the same time period, to surrender property equivalent to that amount, free of all
encumbrances. Atty. Marco Vizueta Encalada shall serve as Acting Recording Clerk. NOTIFY THE
PARTIES. Signed) DR. LILIA MARLENE ORTIZ VÁSQUEZ, DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE
PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS.
I inform you of this for legal purposes.
ATTORNEY MARCO VIZUETA ENCALADA
RECORDING CLERK (ACTING)
[circular stamp] PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBIOS OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ex-171017172443/75/Ex-127-1-2048.jpg)
Ex. 127
- 1. CERT. MERRILL VER:JD REPUBLIC OF ECUADOR www.funcionjudicial-sucumbios.gob.ec Case Number No: 21100-2003-0002 Judicial Mailbox No: 63 By: LILIA MARLENE ORTIZ VÁSQUEZ Nueva Loja, Friday, August 3, 2012 TO: DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIVADENEIRA Dr./Atty.: DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIBADENEIRA (CALLEJAS & ASOCIADOS) In Summary Verbal Proceeding No. 21100-2003-0002 pursued by MARÍA AGUINDA et al. against DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIVADENEIRA, there is the following: PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS. – OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS. Nueva Loja, Friday, August 3, 2012, at 3:00 p.m. HAVING REVIEWED THE RECORD. Add to the record the motions filed by the plaintiffs on August 1, 2012, at 2:24 p.m., and on August 2, 2012, at 3:16 p.m. Add to the file the motions filed by the defendant on August 1, 2012, at 4:54 p.m., 5:01 p.m., and 5:03 p.m.; likewise, add the motions filed by the defendant on August 2, 2012, at 8:17 a.m., at 11:51 a.m., and at 11:59 a.m. In response to the request the defendant makes in its motion dated August 1, 2012, at 4:54 p.m., regarding the first point about the calculation of the amount of the item “assessment of attorneys’ fees,” as the plaintiffs rightly state, I have already ruled on the issue in question, and as for the second point, about others having paid the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, the defendant has not legally substantiated these arguments. Regarding the motion for appeal filed on August 1, 2012, at 5:01 p.m., it is denied as inadmissible, since this case is in the execution phase. The motion and the attachments filed with it on August 2, 2012, at 8:17 a.m., have already been ruled on in prior orders, so it would be improper for me to rule on the request. And regarding the motion filed on August 2, 2012, at 11:59 a.m., the defendant is once again informed that the fact that it disagrees with my opinion should not be understood to mean that it is being denied justice. The second motion for appeal, filed on August 2, 2012, at 11:51 a.m., has already been ruled on, above. In response to the plaintiffs’ request, and since the [defendant] has objected to the cost assessor’s report, the objections have not been duly supported under the law, so under Article 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Court approves the report; and, consequently, the Court orders the [defendant], CHEVRON CORPORATION, to pay the amount of $19,041,414,529.00 United States dollars within 24 hours or, within the same time period, to surrender property equivalent to that amount, free of all encumbrances. Atty. Marco Vizueta Encalada shall serve as Acting Recording Clerk. NOTIFY THE PARTIES. Signed) DR. LILIA MARLENE ORTIZ VÁSQUEZ, DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBÍOS. I inform you of this for legal purposes. ATTORNEY MARCO VIZUETA ENCALADA RECORDING CLERK (ACTING) [circular stamp] PROVINCIAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF SUCUMBIOS OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
- 3. Juicio No. 2003-0002 QQJ.a.O-ahJ 5~-.twulo.:; ,~J.O. GbJ - tfeil.L b- ~u-l) S Guet.-l '&:,. 1 eto J, CORTE PROVINCIAL DE JUSTICIA DE SUCUMBIOS. - PRESIDENCIA CORTE PROVINCIAL DE JUSTICIA DE SUCUMBIOS. Nueva Loja, viemes 3 de agosto del 2012, las 15hOO. VISTOS.- Incorporese al proceso los escritos presentados por la parte actora de fechas 1 de agosto de 2012 a las 14h24 y de fecha 02 de agosto de 2012 a las 15h16. Agreguese al expediente los escritos presentados por la parte demandada de fecha 1 de agosto de 2012 a las 16h54, a las 17hO1 Y 17h03; asi mismo agreguese los escritos presentados por la parte demandada de fecha 02 de agosto de 2012, a las 08h17, a las I1h51 y a las 11h59. Atendiendo 10 solicitado por la parte demandada en su escrito de fecha 1 de agosto de 2012, a las 16h54 primer punto relativo a la determinacion del valor del rubro Liquidacion de honorarios, como bien 10 afirma el demandante la suscrita ya se ha pronunciado sobre el tema propuesto, y al segundo punto, relative a que los honorarios de la parte actora han side cancelados por otras personas, no se ha justificado legalmente tales argumentaciones. En 10 que se refiere al escrito de apelaci6n presentado el dfa 1 de agosto de 2012 a las 17hO1, se niega por improcedente toda vez que la presente causa se encuentra en ejecucion. EI contenido y adjuntos pres~ntados con el escrito de fecha 2 de agosto de 2012, a las 08h17 ya ha sido analizado en providencia anteriores, 10 que hace improcedente pronunciarme sobre 10 solicitado. Y, en 10 referente al escrito de fecha 2 de agosto de 2012 a las 11h59, por una vez mas se Ie hace conocer a la demandada que el hecho de que no este de acuerdo con el criterio de a suscriia no debe entenderse que se Ie esta denegando justicia. El segundo escrito de apelaci6n, presentado el 2 de agosto de 2012, a las llh51 ya ha sido proveido en lineas anteriores. En atenci6n a 10 solicitado por la parte actora; y por cuanto el informe presentado por la senora liquidadora de costas pese a que ha sido objetada, dichas objeciones no han sido debidamente fundamentadas en derecho, de conformidad a 10 dispuesto en el Art. 939 del C6digo d cedimiento Civil se aprueba el mismo; y en consecuencia se dispone que la parte jecuta CHEVRON CORPORATION, dentro del t6rrl}ino de 24hOO pague la canti ad de $1_--,",3 l'.1L4.529,00 d6lares de los Estados Unidos de Norteamerica 0 dentro d 1 mismo ter 'no dimita bienes equivalentes a dicho monte libres de todo gravamenes. tctue ~I Ab. rco Vizueta Encalada, en calidad de Secretario Relator (E) NOTIFIQU SE.- . ORA. LILIA ~ARL ' ,' J RTIZ ASQUEZ , PRESIDENTE SUBROGANTE DE LA CORT ) OVIN IAL DE JUSTICIA DE SUCUMBIOS '",,- Certifico: AB. MARC ZUETA ENCALADA ARlO RELATOR (E) En Nueva Loja, viemes tres de agosto del dos mil doce, a partir de las quince horas y veinte minutos, mediante boletas judiciales notifique el AUTO que antecede a: MARIA AGUINDA Y OTROS en la casilla No. 78 y correo electr6nico pafabibi@gmail.com del Dr.lAb. AB. PABLO FAJARDO MENDOZA. DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIVADENEIRA en la casilla No. 63 y correo electr6nico callejaslaw@gmail.com del Dr.lAb. DR. ADOLFO CALLEJAS RIBADENElRA (CALLEJAS & ASOCIADOS). a: BOLETA en su despacho.Certifico:
- 4.