Lumbalgia y Gabapetinoides. Revisión Sistemática
•
0 recomendaciones•9,916 vistas
Lectura Crítica Revision Sitemática de Eficacia Gabapetinoides en la Lumbalgia. Anticonvulsants in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar radicular pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a Lumbalgia y Gabapetinoides. Revisión Sistemática
Similar a Lumbalgia y Gabapetinoides. Revisión Sistemática (6)
Más de Rafael Bravo Toledo
Más de Rafael Bravo Toledo (20)
Último
Último (20)
Lumbalgia y Gabapetinoides. Revisión Sistemática
- 3. lectura de una revisión sistemática Pregunta PICO
- 4. lectura de una revisión sistemática
- 6. lectura de una revisión sistemática
- 7. lectura de una revisión sistemática
- 8. https://www.pedro.org.au/spanish/downloads/pedro-scale/ lectura de una revisión sistemática
- 9. lectura de una revisión sistemática
- 10. lectura de una revisión sistemática No aparece en figuras
- 11. lectura de una revisión sistemática ¿Como se presentan y cuales fueron los resultados? Representación grafica e intervalo de confianza
- 12. Effects on pain and disability of anticonvulsants for low back pain with or without radiating leg pain or lumbar radicular pain. Oliver Enke et al. CMAJ 2018;190:E786-E793 ©2018 by Canadian Medical Association
- 13. lectura de una revisión sistemática ¿Como se presentan y cuales fueron los resultados? Figure 3: Adverse events with anticonvulsants for low back pain with or without radiating leg pain or lumbar radicular pain. Note: AE = adverse event, CI = confidence interval. *Crossover trial. †Trial investigated neurogenic claudication.
- 14. Aplicabilidad ¿Se pueden aplicar los resultado de esta revisión en el cuidado de mis pacientes? lectura de una revisión sistemática
Notas del editor
- Figure 2: Effects on pain and disability of anticonvulsants for low back pain with or without radiating leg pain or lumbar radicular pain. Note: CI = confidence interval, immediate term = follow-up evaluations ≤ 2 weeks after randomization, intermediate term = follow-up evaluations > 3 months but < 12 months, long-term = ≥ 12 months, short-term = follow-up evaluations > 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months, SD = standard deviation. *All effect sizes have been converted to standardized mean differences to allow comparison across all outcomes. †Crossover trial. ‡Trial investigated neurogenic claudication. §Pain scale 0–10 (numerical pain rating scale). ¶Pain scale 0–3. **Pain scale 0–78 (Pain Rating Index). ††Oswestry Disability Index 0–100. ‡‡Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire 0–23. §§The comparison had a very high heterogeneity (I2 = 95%); therefore, results were not pooled.
- Effects on pain and disability of anticonvulsants for low back pain with or without radiating leg pain or lumbar radicular pain. Note: CI = confidence interval, immediate term = follow-up evaluations ≤ 2 weeks after randomization, intermediate term = follow-up evaluations > 3 months but < 12 months, long-term = ≥ 12 months, short-term = follow-up evaluations > 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months, SD = standard deviation. *All effect sizes have been converted to standardized mean differences to allow comparison across all outcomes. †Crossover trial. ‡Trial investigated neurogenic claudication. §Pain scale 0–10 (numerical pain rating scale). ¶Pain scale 0–3. **Pain scale 0–78 (Pain Rating Index). ††Oswestry Disability Index 0–100. ‡‡Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire 0–23. §§The comparison had a very high heterogeneity (I2 = 95%); therefore, results were not pooled.