¿Cuál es el rumbo en el tratamiento farmacológico de la DM2: Terapia dual, triple, semanal, oral, inyectable, cúando? Guías 2015. ¿Sigue la metformina como terapia inicial?
Memorias Conferencia Científica Anual sobre Síndrome Metabólico 2015 - Programa Científico - SOCIEDAD MEXICANA DE NUTRICIÓN Y ENDOCRINOLOGÍA - MESA DE DEBATE - Dra. Raquel Noemí Faradji Hazán - Esp. Endocrinología, Miembro de la Sociedad Mexicana de Nutrición y Endocrinología
Cadime algoritmo 2016. Tratamiento de la DM tipo 2
Similar a ¿Cuál es el rumbo en el tratamiento farmacológico de la DM2: Terapia dual, triple, semanal, oral, inyectable, cúando? Guías 2015. ¿Sigue la metformina como terapia inicial?
Similar a ¿Cuál es el rumbo en el tratamiento farmacológico de la DM2: Terapia dual, triple, semanal, oral, inyectable, cúando? Guías 2015. ¿Sigue la metformina como terapia inicial? (20)
Historia Clínica y Consentimiento Informado en Odontología
¿Cuál es el rumbo en el tratamiento farmacológico de la DM2: Terapia dual, triple, semanal, oral, inyectable, cúando? Guías 2015. ¿Sigue la metformina como terapia inicial?
1. ¿Cuál es el Rumbo en el Tratamiento
Farmacológico de la DT2?
7ª Conferencia Científica Anual sobre
Síndrome Metabólico
Agosto 14, 2015
Dra. Raquel N. Faradji
rfaradji@gmail.com
2. HbA1c (%)
glucosa (mg/dl)
4% - 5.6%
5.7% - 6.4%
>= 6.5%diabetes
pre-diabetes
normal
El Riesgo de Complicaciones Micro* y Macrovasculares**
existe desde la Intolerancia a la Glucosa
*Microvascular complications of impaired glucose tolerance
Singleton JR, et al, Diabetes, 2003
**Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(39):3035-87 Faradji R, Sainz E, 2015
3. % HbA1c
mg/dl de glucosa en sangre
sin diabetes/
control IDEAL
muy buen control
buen control
riesgo muy
elevado
aceptable en
algunos casos
mg/dl Glucosa
pre — posprandial
70-99 — <140
< 110 — <140
< 130 — <180
< 150 — <200
> 150 — >200
Metas de Control para Reducir el
Riesgo de Complicaciones Crónicas
American Diabetes Association (2015); Ogle, Middlehurst, Silink, y Hanas (2013);
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologist (2015). Faradji R, Sainz E, 2015
4. Metas de Control
American Diabetes Association (2015); Ogle, Middlehurst, Silink, y Hanas (2013);
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologist (2015).
Glucosa en ayuno
Glucosa postprandial
(aprox. 2hr después de comer)
Hemoglobina
glicosilada A1c
Normal 70 - 99 mg/dl ≤ 139 mg/dl ≤ 5.6%
Adultos (AACE) <110 ≤ 140 mg/dl ≤ 6.5%
Adultos (ADA) 80 - 130 mg/dl < 180 mg/dl < 7%
Niños/as con DT1 90 - 130 mg/dl < 180mg/dl < 7.5%
Embarazo
(DT1 o DT2)
60 - 99 mg/dl 100 – 129 mg/dl < 6%
Diabetes Gestacional ≤ 95 mg/dl ≤ 120 mg/dl < 6%
Las Guías recomiendan niveles de HbA1c lo más cercano a lo
normal con la mayor seguridad posibe
6. more
stringent
less
stringent
Patient attitude and
expected treatment efforts highly motivated, adherent,
excellent self-care capacities
less motivated, non-adherent,
poor self-care capacities
Risks potentially associated
with hypoglycemia and
other drug adverse effects
low high
Disease duration
newly diagnosed long-standing
Life expectancy
long short
Important comorbidities
absent severefew / mild
Established vascular
complications absent severefew / mild
Readily available limited
Usually not
modifiable
Potentially
modifiable
HbA1c
7%
PATIENT / DISEASE FEATURES
Approach to the management
of hyperglycemia
Resources and support
system
Modulation of the intensiveness of
glucose lowering therapy in T2DM
Diabetes Care 2015;38:140-149; Diabetologia 2015;58:429-442
7. Healthy eating, weight control, increased physical activity & diabetes education
Metformin
high
low risk
neutral/loss
GI / lactic acidosis
low
If HbA1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote
any specific preference - choice dependent on a variety of patient- & disease-specific factors):
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
high
low risk
gain
edema, HF, fxs
low
Thiazolidine-
dione
intermediate
low risk
neutral
rare
high
DPP-4
inhibitor
highest
high risk
gain
hypoglycemia
variable
Insulin (basal)
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
Basal Insulin +
Sulfonylurea
+
TZD
DPP-4-i
GLP-1-RA
Insulin§
or
or
or
or
Thiazolidine-
dione
+
SU
DPP-4-i
GLP-1-RA
Insulin§
TZD
DPP-4-ior
or
or GLP-1-RA
high
low risk
loss
GI
high
GLP-1 receptor
agonist
Sulfonylurea
high
moderate risk
gain
hypoglycemia
low
SGLT2
inhibitor
intermediate
low risk
loss
GU, dehydration
high
SU
TZD
Insulin§
GLP-1 receptor
agonist
+
SGLT-2
Inhibitor
+
SU
TZD
Insulin§
Metformin
+
Metformin
+
or
or
or
or
SGLT2-i
or
or
or
SGLT2-i
Mono-
therapy
Efficacy*
Hypo risk
Weight
Side effects
Costs
Dual
therapy†
Efficacy*
Hypo risk
Weight
Side effects
Costs
Triple
therapy
or
or
DPP-4
Inhibitor
+
SU
TZD
Insulin§
SGLT2-i
or
or
or
SGLT2-i
or
DPP-4-i
If HbA1c target not achieved after ~3 months of dual therapy, proceed to 3-drug combination (order not meant to denote
any specific preference - choice dependent on a variety of patient- & disease-specific factors):
If HbA1c target not achieved after ~3 months of triple therapy and patient (1) on oral combination, move to injectables, (2) on GLP-1 RA, add
basal insulin, or (3) on optimally titrated basal insulin, add GLP-1-RA or mealtime insulin. In refractory patients consider adding TZD or SGL T2-i:
Metformin
+
Combination
injectable
therapy‡
GLP-1-RAMealtime Insulin
Insulin (basal)
+
Diabetes Care 2015;38:140-149; Diabetologia 2015;58:429-442
8. Insulina Basal
(usualmente metformina+/− otro agente no insulínico)
Inicio: 10 U/día o 0.1–0.2 U/kg/día
• Ajuste: 10–15% o 2 – 4 U una o dos
veces a la semana hasta llegar a la GPA
• Con hipoglucemia: Identifique la
causa;
reduzca 4 U o 10-20%
Approach to starting and adjusting insulin in type 2 diabetes. FBG, fasting blood glucose; GLP-1-RA GLP-1 receptor agonist; hypo,
hypoglycemia; mod., moderate; PPG, postprandial glucose; #, number. Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al.
Flexibilidad más flexible menos flexible
Cambio a una insulina
premezclada 2 veces al día
Si no está
controlado y la
GPA está en
meta
(o dosis >0.5
U/kg/día), trate
elevaciones GPP
con insulina en
las comidas
Agregar una
inyección de insulina
rápida en la comida
principal
Inicio: 4 U, 0.1 U/kg, o 10% de la dosis
basal.
Si la A1C<8%, considere la basal en la
misma cantidad
• Ajuste: dosis 1-2 U o10-15% una o dos
veces al día hasta que SMBG esté en meta
• Hipog: Determine y maneje la causa;
dosis correspondiente 2-4 U o 10-20%
Inicio: Divida la dosis basal actual en 2/3
AM, 1/3 PM o 1/2 AM, 1/2 PM
• Ajuste: dosis 1-2 U o 10-15%
Una o dos veces semanalmente hasta que
SMBG alcance las metas
• Hipog: Determine y maneje la causa;
dosis correspondiente by 2-4 U or 10-
20%
Agregue ≥ 2 injecciones de insulina rápida
Antes de las comidas (“basal–bolo”)
Inicio: 4 U, 0.1 U/kg, o 10% de la basal
dosis/comida. Si A1C<8%, consider
basal by same amount
• Ajuste: dosis 1-2 U o 10-15% uno o
dos veces semanal hasta que SMBG esté en
meta
• Hipog: Determine y maneje la causa;
dosis correspondiente 2-4 U o 10-20%
Complejidad
baja
mod
alta
#
Inyecciones
2
3+
1
Regresar
Si no está
controlado
considerar
basal-bolo
Si no está
controlado
considerar
basal-bolo
Diabetes Care Volume 38,
Supplement 1, January 2015 .
11. PUNTOS PRINCIPALES
• Individualizar metas glucémicas y terapias anti-hiperglucémicas.
• Alimentación, ejercicio y educación: base de cualquier programa terapeútico
en diabetes
• Metformina, a menos que este contraindicada = terapia de 1a-línea.
• Después de metformina, información limitada. Terapia de Combinación con 1-
2 agentes orales/ inyectables es razonable; minimizar efectos adversos.
• Al final, muchos pacientes van a requerir terapia con insulina sola o en
combinación con otros agentes para mantener el control glucémico.
• Todas las decisiones de tratamiento deben realizarse en conjunto con el
paciente (enfoque en preferencias, necesidades y valores.)
• Reducción de riesgo CV – foco importante de la terapia
Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364–1379
Diabetologia 2012;55:1577–1596
Overview of the microvascular, macrovascular and mortality outcomes from large T2DM and T1DM randomized clinical trials that focused on the relationship between glycemic control and complications.
This is a depiction of the elements of decision-making used to determine the intensivenss of efforts to achieve glycemic targets. Greater concerns about a particular domain are represented by increasing height of the ramp. Thus, characteristics/predicaments towards the left justify more stringent efforts to lower HbA1c, whereas those towards the right are compatible with less stringent efforts. In general, most patients should be targeted to <7%, but as previously discussed, tighter targets may benefit younger patients whereas in older individuals, a more conservative approach is necessary.
Where possible, such decisions should be made in conjunction with the patient, reflecting his or her preferences, needs and values.
This ‘scale’ is not designed to be applied rigidly but to be used as a broad construct to help guide clinical decisions.
(Adapted with permission from Ismail-Beigi et al, Ann Intern Med 2011;154:554-559.)
Previously, when combinations of multiple oral agents (i.e., up to triple combination therapy) were no longer effective at controlling blood glucose, insulin was typically added, initially as a single injection of basal insulin. If this was or became ineffective in controlling HbA1c, post-prandial hyperglycemia was usually to blame. Adding several injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (‘basal-bolus’ insulin therapy) would be the next step to control meal time glycemic excursions. Over the past several years, there has been increasing evidence that the combination of basal insulin with a GLP-1 receptor agonist may provide equal glucose lowering effect as up to 3 injections of meal time insulin, yet with weight loss instead of weight gain, and with less hypoglycemia.
This updated figure therefore underscores the potential value of this specific combination. It should be considered in patients who appear to need more than basal insulin, with or without oral agents. In those patients who do not respond adequately to the addition of a GLP-1 receptor agonist to basal insulin, the “basal–bolus” insulin strategy should be used instead (or twice daily premixed insulin.) In selected patients at this stage of disease, the addition of an SGLT2 inhibitor may further improve control and reduce the amount of insulin required. This is particularly an issue when large doses of insulin are required in obese, highly insulin-resistant patients. Another, older, option, the addition of a TZD (usually pioglitazone), also has an insulin-sparing effect and may also reduce HbA1c, albeit at the expense of weight gain, edema, and increased heart failure risk.